Donald L. Gilbert , David A. Huddleston , Karlee Y. Migneault , Deana Crocetti , Paul S. Horn , Steve W. Wu , Stewart H. Mostofsky
{"title":"Reliability of short interval cortical inhibition in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder","authors":"Donald L. Gilbert , David A. Huddleston , Karlee Y. Migneault , Deana Crocetti , Paul S. Horn , Steve W. Wu , Stewart H. Mostofsky","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Utility of biomarkers depends on test–retest consistency. Reduced Short Interval Cortical Inhibition (SICI) has emerged as a consistent finding in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD); however, test–retest has not been established for children with ADHD. This is particularly crucial given that Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) motor evoked potential (MEP)-based measures have high intra-subject variability and susceptibility to state-effects on motor cortex excitability. Addressing this, the objective of this study was to estimate test–retest reliability of paired-pulse SICI and of Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) in children, including those with ADHD and typically developing (TD) controls.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty-four 8-to-12-year-old children (28 female; 35 ADHD; 29 TD) were recruited at two sites and SICI and ICF measured across two visits separated by 21 days. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Good reliability for SICI (ICC > 0.75), but only moderate for ICF (ICC > 0.50), was found among ADHD children, after accounting for test-pulse MEP amplitudes (>0.25 mV) and outliers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings support the potential for SICI as a biomarker of ADHD in school-aged children.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This research addresses a critical gap in clinical neurophysiology, as estimating the reliability of SICI is needed to utilize it in interventional or longitudinal studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 2110750"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245725006029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Utility of biomarkers depends on test–retest consistency. Reduced Short Interval Cortical Inhibition (SICI) has emerged as a consistent finding in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD); however, test–retest has not been established for children with ADHD. This is particularly crucial given that Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) motor evoked potential (MEP)-based measures have high intra-subject variability and susceptibility to state-effects on motor cortex excitability. Addressing this, the objective of this study was to estimate test–retest reliability of paired-pulse SICI and of Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) in children, including those with ADHD and typically developing (TD) controls.
Methods
Sixty-four 8-to-12-year-old children (28 female; 35 ADHD; 29 TD) were recruited at two sites and SICI and ICF measured across two visits separated by 21 days. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were calculated.
Results
Good reliability for SICI (ICC > 0.75), but only moderate for ICF (ICC > 0.50), was found among ADHD children, after accounting for test-pulse MEP amplitudes (>0.25 mV) and outliers.
Conclusions
These findings support the potential for SICI as a biomarker of ADHD in school-aged children.
Significance
This research addresses a critical gap in clinical neurophysiology, as estimating the reliability of SICI is needed to utilize it in interventional or longitudinal studies.
期刊介绍:
As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology.
Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.