Microscopic and macroscopic failure mechanisms in sintered soda-lime glass spheres used as sandstone surrogates

IF 7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Brett S. Kuwik , Max Daud , Gangmin (Jacob) Kim , Aidan Looney , Samuel Budoff , Mohmad M. Thakur , Ryan C. Hurley
{"title":"Microscopic and macroscopic failure mechanisms in sintered soda-lime glass spheres used as sandstone surrogates","authors":"Brett S. Kuwik ,&nbsp;Max Daud ,&nbsp;Gangmin (Jacob) Kim ,&nbsp;Aidan Looney ,&nbsp;Samuel Budoff ,&nbsp;Mohmad M. Thakur ,&nbsp;Ryan C. Hurley","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrmms.2025.106124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cemented granular materials (CGMs) such as sedimentary rocks, ceramics, and sandstones are central to both natural geologic systems and engineered structures. Despite their importance, the relationship between microscopic and macroscale mechanical behavior in natural CGMs is not yet fully understood. To help bridge this gap, synthetic analogs like sintered soda-lime glass beads offer a platform for systematically tuning micro-structural parameters, including grain size and porosity, allowing for controlled investigations into failure processes. In this work, we examine sintered glass bead assemblies at the scale of both particle and bulk specimens to assess their fracture behavior and their applicability as proxies for natural sandstones. A combination of variable sintering protocols, microscopy, tensile testing of sintered bonds, and unconfined compression testing was employed. Key observations include: (1) inter-particle bonds exhibit the presence of pores reminiscent of those found in natural sedimentary rocks; (2) the strength of individual bonds followed a statistical size effect; (3) compressive strengths of the bulk samples fell within the range reported for sandstones of similar porosities; and (4) the strength-porosity relationship matched predictions from pore-emanated crack models but diverged from Hertzian failure models. These results deepen our understanding of failure in sintered CGMs and highlight their utility for studying deformation mechanisms relevant to natural geologic materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54941,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 106124"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160925001017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cemented granular materials (CGMs) such as sedimentary rocks, ceramics, and sandstones are central to both natural geologic systems and engineered structures. Despite their importance, the relationship between microscopic and macroscale mechanical behavior in natural CGMs is not yet fully understood. To help bridge this gap, synthetic analogs like sintered soda-lime glass beads offer a platform for systematically tuning micro-structural parameters, including grain size and porosity, allowing for controlled investigations into failure processes. In this work, we examine sintered glass bead assemblies at the scale of both particle and bulk specimens to assess their fracture behavior and their applicability as proxies for natural sandstones. A combination of variable sintering protocols, microscopy, tensile testing of sintered bonds, and unconfined compression testing was employed. Key observations include: (1) inter-particle bonds exhibit the presence of pores reminiscent of those found in natural sedimentary rocks; (2) the strength of individual bonds followed a statistical size effect; (3) compressive strengths of the bulk samples fell within the range reported for sandstones of similar porosities; and (4) the strength-porosity relationship matched predictions from pore-emanated crack models but diverged from Hertzian failure models. These results deepen our understanding of failure in sintered CGMs and highlight their utility for studying deformation mechanisms relevant to natural geologic materials.
作为砂岩替代物的烧结钠石灰玻璃球微观和宏观破坏机制
胶结颗粒材料(cgm),如沉积岩、陶瓷和砂岩是自然地质系统和工程结构的核心。尽管它们很重要,但在天然cgm中微观和宏观力学行为之间的关系尚未完全了解。为了弥补这一差距,烧结钠钙玻璃微珠等合成类似物为系统地调整微观结构参数(包括晶粒尺寸和孔隙度)提供了平台,从而可以对失效过程进行可控的研究。在这项工作中,我们在颗粒和大块样品的尺度上检查烧结玻璃珠组件,以评估它们的断裂行为及其作为天然砂岩替代品的适用性。采用可变烧结方案、显微检查、烧结键的拉伸测试和无侧限压缩测试相结合的方法。主要观察结果包括:(1)颗粒间键显示出与天然沉积岩相似的孔隙;(2)个体纽带强度服从统计规模效应;(3)试样抗压强度在相似孔隙度砂岩的范围内;(4)强度-孔隙率关系与孔源裂纹模型预测相符,但与赫兹破坏模型预测不一致。这些结果加深了我们对烧结cgm破坏的理解,并突出了它们在研究与自然地质材料相关的变形机制方面的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
196
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences focuses on original research, new developments, site measurements, and case studies within the fields of rock mechanics and rock engineering. Serving as an international platform, it showcases high-quality papers addressing rock mechanics and the application of its principles and techniques in mining and civil engineering projects situated on or within rock masses. These projects encompass a wide range, including slopes, open-pit mines, quarries, shafts, tunnels, caverns, underground mines, metro systems, dams, hydro-electric stations, geothermal energy, petroleum engineering, and radioactive waste disposal. The journal welcomes submissions on various topics, with particular interest in theoretical advancements, analytical and numerical methods, rock testing, site investigation, and case studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信