Epstein–Barr virus-associated infectious mononucleosis exhibits substantially higher non-treponemal test titers in biological false-positive reactions

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Naoki Matsuura , Takashi Matono , Miho Kuroki , Kenta Saitou
{"title":"Epstein–Barr virus-associated infectious mononucleosis exhibits substantially higher non-treponemal test titers in biological false-positive reactions","authors":"Naoki Matsuura ,&nbsp;Takashi Matono ,&nbsp;Miho Kuroki ,&nbsp;Kenta Saitou","doi":"10.1016/j.jiac.2025.102738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Biological false-positive (BFP) reactions in rapid plasma reagin (RPR) tests can complicate syphilis screening interpretation. Although Epstein–Barr virus-associated infectious mononucleosis (EBV-IM) is a known cause of BFP reactions, the characteristics of RPR titers in such cases remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the RPR titers in BFP reactions between patients with EBV-IM and those with other underlying conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed the RPR and <em>Treponema pallidum</em> hemagglutination assay (TPLA) results of all tests performed at a community hospital in Japan between April 2016 and March 2024. BFP reactions were defined as positive RPR and negative TPLA results. Clinical characteristics and RPR titers were compared between EBV-IM and other causes of BFP reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 154 confirmed BFP cases, EBV-IM cases (n = 7) showed significantly higher RPR titers than other underlying conditions (n = 147) (median 28.5 relative units [RU], interquartile range [IQR]: 11.2–31.2 vs. 1.9 RU, IQR: 1.2–4.3, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), despite a significantly younger age (median age 18 years, IQR: 17.4–25 vs. 72 years, IQR, 44.5–82, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Among all BFP cases, neoplasms were the most common underlying condition (22.1 %), followed by digestive diseases (8.4 %) and infectious diseases (7.8 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>EBV-IM is associated with distinctively high RPR titers in BFP reactions, in contrast to the typically low titers observed under other conditions. Clinicians should be aware that high RPR titers can occur during BFP reactions, particularly in young patients with suspected EBV infection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy","volume":"31 7","pages":"Article 102738"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1341321X25001357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Biological false-positive (BFP) reactions in rapid plasma reagin (RPR) tests can complicate syphilis screening interpretation. Although Epstein–Barr virus-associated infectious mononucleosis (EBV-IM) is a known cause of BFP reactions, the characteristics of RPR titers in such cases remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the RPR titers in BFP reactions between patients with EBV-IM and those with other underlying conditions.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the RPR and Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPLA) results of all tests performed at a community hospital in Japan between April 2016 and March 2024. BFP reactions were defined as positive RPR and negative TPLA results. Clinical characteristics and RPR titers were compared between EBV-IM and other causes of BFP reactions.

Results

Among 154 confirmed BFP cases, EBV-IM cases (n = 7) showed significantly higher RPR titers than other underlying conditions (n = 147) (median 28.5 relative units [RU], interquartile range [IQR]: 11.2–31.2 vs. 1.9 RU, IQR: 1.2–4.3, p < 0.001), despite a significantly younger age (median age 18 years, IQR: 17.4–25 vs. 72 years, IQR, 44.5–82, p < 0.001). Among all BFP cases, neoplasms were the most common underlying condition (22.1 %), followed by digestive diseases (8.4 %) and infectious diseases (7.8 %).

Conclusions

EBV-IM is associated with distinctively high RPR titers in BFP reactions, in contrast to the typically low titers observed under other conditions. Clinicians should be aware that high RPR titers can occur during BFP reactions, particularly in young patients with suspected EBV infection.

Abstract Image

爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒相关的传染性单核细胞增多症在生物学假阳性反应中显示出明显更高的非螺旋体检测滴度
目的快速血浆反应素(RPR)检测中生物学假阳性(BFP)反应使梅毒筛查解释复杂化。虽然eb病毒相关的传染性单核细胞增多症(EBV-IM)是已知的BFP反应的原因,但这种情况下的RPR滴度特征仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较EBV-IM患者和其他基础疾病患者BFP反应的RPR滴度。方法回顾性分析2016年4月至2024年3月在日本某社区医院进行的梅毒螺旋体血凝试验(TPLA)和RPR检测结果。BFP反应定义为RPR阳性和TPLA阴性。比较EBV-IM与其他原因引起的BFP反应的临床特征和RPR滴度。结果在154例BFP确诊病例中,EBV-IM病例(n = 7)的RPR滴度显著高于其他基础疾病(n = 147)(中位数28.5相对单位[RU],四分位数间距[IQR]: 11.2-31.2 vs. 1.9 RU, IQR: 1.2-4.3, p <;0.001),尽管年龄明显年轻(中位年龄18岁,IQR: 17.4-25 vs. 72岁,IQR, 44.5-82, p <;0.001)。在所有BFP病例中,肿瘤是最常见的基础疾病(22.1%),其次是消化系统疾病(8.4%)和传染病(7.8%)。结论sebv - im在BFP反应中具有明显的高RPR滴度,而在其他条件下具有典型的低滴度。临床医生应该意识到,在BFP反应期间可能出现高RPR滴度,特别是在疑似EBV感染的年轻患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy INFECTIOUS DISEASES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy (JIC) — official journal of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases — welcomes original papers, laboratory or clinical, as well as case reports, notes, committee reports, surveillance and guidelines from all parts of the world on all aspects of chemotherapy, covering the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and control of infection, including treatment with anticancer drugs. Experimental studies on animal models and pharmacokinetics, and reports on epidemiology and clinical trials are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信