Evaluating quality of service for bicyclists on rural highways: insights from a comprehensive user survey and mixed-logit analysis

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Ana Tsui Moreno, Yangqian Cai, Santiago Linares-Ramirez, Scott S. Washburn, Ahmed Al-Kaisy, Jorge Barrios, Bastian Schroeder
{"title":"Evaluating quality of service for bicyclists on rural highways: insights from a comprehensive user survey and mixed-logit analysis","authors":"Ana Tsui Moreno, Yangqian Cai, Santiago Linares-Ramirez, Scott S. Washburn, Ahmed Al-Kaisy, Jorge Barrios, Bastian Schroeder","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10620-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cycling on rural highways presents comfort and safety concerns due to the large speed differentials between bicyclists and automobiles. A shortcoming of the current operational methods for rural highways is the limited consideration of quality of service for non-motorized users. This research aims to determine which variables are most relevant to bicyclists cycling (or not) on rural highways and their operational cycling preferences. An online survey collected 982 responses from individuals who cycle on rural highways in the United States. Eight choice tasks were presented with six factors: pavement quality, automobile traffic level, posted speed limit, roadside design, context class, and grade. These factors were obtained from a preliminary survey targeting highway analysis and design practitioners. The results of a mixed-logit model analysis suggest that the presence of a shoulder and its width are the most critical factors to a cyclist’s perceived quality of service on a rural highway. We found that the difference between rural-town and suburban contexts was minor compared to rural contexts. The results demonstrate how cyclist types influence their overall willingness to cycle and their preferences for scenario-specific attributes. This opens the discussion to include different sets of thresholds to assess service levels as a function of cyclist type, following the level of traffic stress approach, and separate perception models by cyclist type. These results should inform recommendations for future research on improving existing evaluations related to bicycling on rural highways.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10620-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cycling on rural highways presents comfort and safety concerns due to the large speed differentials between bicyclists and automobiles. A shortcoming of the current operational methods for rural highways is the limited consideration of quality of service for non-motorized users. This research aims to determine which variables are most relevant to bicyclists cycling (or not) on rural highways and their operational cycling preferences. An online survey collected 982 responses from individuals who cycle on rural highways in the United States. Eight choice tasks were presented with six factors: pavement quality, automobile traffic level, posted speed limit, roadside design, context class, and grade. These factors were obtained from a preliminary survey targeting highway analysis and design practitioners. The results of a mixed-logit model analysis suggest that the presence of a shoulder and its width are the most critical factors to a cyclist’s perceived quality of service on a rural highway. We found that the difference between rural-town and suburban contexts was minor compared to rural contexts. The results demonstrate how cyclist types influence their overall willingness to cycle and their preferences for scenario-specific attributes. This opens the discussion to include different sets of thresholds to assess service levels as a function of cyclist type, following the level of traffic stress approach, and separate perception models by cyclist type. These results should inform recommendations for future research on improving existing evaluations related to bicycling on rural highways.

评估农村高速公路上骑自行车者的服务质量:来自综合用户调查和混合logit分析的见解
在农村高速公路上骑自行车,由于自行车和汽车之间的速度差异很大,因此存在舒适性和安全性问题。目前农村公路运营方法的一个缺点是对非机动用户的服务质量考虑有限。本研究旨在确定哪些变量与骑自行车的人在农村高速公路上骑(或不骑)和他们的骑行偏好最相关。一项在线调查收集了982名在美国农村公路上骑车的人的回复。8个选择任务由6个因素组成:路面质量、汽车交通水平、张贴限速、路边设计、环境类别和等级。这些因素是从一项针对公路分析和设计从业人员的初步调查中获得的。混合logit模型分析的结果表明,肩的存在及其宽度是骑自行车者在农村高速公路上感知服务质量的最关键因素。我们发现,与农村环境相比,农村-城镇和郊区环境之间的差异很小。研究结果表明,骑自行车的类型如何影响他们的整体骑行意愿和他们对特定场景属性的偏好。这开启了讨论,包括不同的阈值集来评估服务水平作为骑自行车者类型的函数,遵循交通压力水平方法,并根据骑自行车者类型分离感知模型。这些结果应为今后研究改进有关在农村公路上骑自行车的现有评价提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信