A multi-scale framework for understanding spatial scale effects on ecosystem service heterogeneity, interactions, drivers and their socio-ecological impact pathways for adaptive management

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Qing Wu , Yu CAO , Dan Su , Yu Cao
{"title":"A multi-scale framework for understanding spatial scale effects on ecosystem service heterogeneity, interactions, drivers and their socio-ecological impact pathways for adaptive management","authors":"Qing Wu ,&nbsp;Yu CAO ,&nbsp;Dan Su ,&nbsp;Yu Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the hierarchical complexity of ecosystems, understanding the interactions and mechanisms influencing ecosystem services (ESs) across multiple scales is essential for effective sustainable management. This study proposed a multi-scale analytical framework that identified spatial scale characteristics, summarized patterns, analyzed causes, and provided management suggestions. Focusing on the Yangtze River Delta, the study quantified five typical ESs at grid, county, and city scales, identifying their characteristics through spatial autocorrelation, trade-offs, synergies, and ES bundles. XGBoost and random forest models were used to identify dominant socio-ecological factors at different scales, while the partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) revealed the impact pathways of these drivers and their direct and indirect effects on ESs. Key findings included: (1) Strong spatial autocorrelation was observed across all ESs, with carbon sequestration (CS) demonstrating the greatest scale stability and food supply (FS) exhibiting the highest variability; (2) Trade-offs were concentrated in northern cultivated areas, while synergies thrived in southwestern mountains, with synergies increasing and trade-offs decreasing as spatial scale expands (3) Natural factors (e.g., climate, geography, vegetation); primarily influenced ESs, but socio-economic and landscape factors increasingly shaped FS and CS at larger scales; (4) Geographic conditions had the strongest positive impact, climate effects diminished with increasing scale, and urbanization, particularly the proportion of built-up land, negatively influenced ESs through its impact on vegetation cover. These insights underscore the need for tailored, scale-specific strategies to support sustainable ecosystem management and urban development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"516 ","pages":"Article 145757"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625011072","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the hierarchical complexity of ecosystems, understanding the interactions and mechanisms influencing ecosystem services (ESs) across multiple scales is essential for effective sustainable management. This study proposed a multi-scale analytical framework that identified spatial scale characteristics, summarized patterns, analyzed causes, and provided management suggestions. Focusing on the Yangtze River Delta, the study quantified five typical ESs at grid, county, and city scales, identifying their characteristics through spatial autocorrelation, trade-offs, synergies, and ES bundles. XGBoost and random forest models were used to identify dominant socio-ecological factors at different scales, while the partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) revealed the impact pathways of these drivers and their direct and indirect effects on ESs. Key findings included: (1) Strong spatial autocorrelation was observed across all ESs, with carbon sequestration (CS) demonstrating the greatest scale stability and food supply (FS) exhibiting the highest variability; (2) Trade-offs were concentrated in northern cultivated areas, while synergies thrived in southwestern mountains, with synergies increasing and trade-offs decreasing as spatial scale expands (3) Natural factors (e.g., climate, geography, vegetation); primarily influenced ESs, but socio-economic and landscape factors increasingly shaped FS and CS at larger scales; (4) Geographic conditions had the strongest positive impact, climate effects diminished with increasing scale, and urbanization, particularly the proportion of built-up land, negatively influenced ESs through its impact on vegetation cover. These insights underscore the need for tailored, scale-specific strategies to support sustainable ecosystem management and urban development.

Abstract Image

一个理解生态系统服务异质性、相互作用、驱动因素及其社会生态影响路径的空间尺度框架
考虑到生态系统的层次复杂性,了解跨多个尺度影响生态系统服务(ESs)的相互作用和机制对于有效的可持续管理至关重要。本文提出了一个识别空间尺度特征、总结格局、分析原因、提出管理建议的多尺度分析框架。本文以长三角为研究对象,通过空间自相关、权衡、协同效应和ES束等维度,对网格、县域和城市尺度上的5种典型ESs进行了量化。利用XGBoost和随机森林模型识别不同尺度的主导社会生态因子,利用偏最小二乘-结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)揭示这些驱动因素的影响路径及其对生态环境的直接和间接影响。主要发现包括:(1)各生态系统具有较强的空间自相关性,其中碳固存(CS)表现出最大的尺度稳定性,食物供应(FS)表现出最大的变异性;②随着空间尺度的扩大,协同效应增强,权衡效应减小;(3)自然因素(如气候、地理、植被)主要影响生态系统,但社会经济和景观因素在更大范围内逐渐影响生态系统和生态系统;(4)地理条件对生态系统的正向影响最大,气候影响随规模的增大而减弱,城市化尤其是建设用地比例通过对植被覆盖的影响对生态系统产生负向影响。这些见解强调了为支持可持续生态系统管理和城市发展而制定量身定制的、针对特定规模的战略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信