M. Hincapié , A. Galdós-Balzategui , B.L.S. Freitas , F. Reygadas , L.P. Sabogal-Paz , N. Pichel , L. Botero , L.J. Montoya , L. Galeano , G. Carvajal , H. Lubarsky , K.Y. Ng , R. Price , S. Gaihre , J.A. Byrne , P. Fernández-Ibáñez
{"title":"Automated household-based water disinfection system for rural communities: Field trials and community appropriation","authors":"M. Hincapié , A. Galdós-Balzategui , B.L.S. Freitas , F. Reygadas , L.P. Sabogal-Paz , N. Pichel , L. Botero , L.J. Montoya , L. Galeano , G. Carvajal , H. Lubarsky , K.Y. Ng , R. Price , S. Gaihre , J.A. Byrne , P. Fernández-Ibáñez","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research involved a pilot field trial of household-based water treatment and storage for potable water in rural communities of Colombia and Mexico. Through co-creation with the communities, key parameters were considered when designing the systems, including the efficiency of disinfection, the provision of a sufficient volume of treated water, variability of the raw water quality and access to freshwater sources. The water treatment systems were automated with electronic controllers. They consisted of a sedimentation tank (bottom), a treatment unit (pre-filtration followed by UVC disinfection), a pump to move the treated water to a second elevated tank for storing the treated water (150 L or 250 L), and a small distribution network that provided water inside the home by gravity (kitchen and bathroom taps). They were installed at households in rural communities of Colombia (52 systems) and Mexico (187 systems) and the performance was evaluated over 12 consecutive months. Efficiency was evaluated using standard microbial and physicochemical water quality parameters. Treated water turbidity was below the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation (< 5 NTU) in >97 % of the samples in Colombia and 98.9 % in Mexico. The treatment reduced <em>Escherichia coli</em> to potable levels in all cases, regardless of the initial microbiological load and the variation of the raw water quality. In some cases, an increase in <em>E. coli</em> values was detected in the distribution network within the households (post-storage), although not statistically significant, they represented a ‘moderate risk’. The health risk associated with the water was reduced to ‘low risk’ in >80 % of the treated water samples vs. <10 % before treatment. After 12 months of operation, the household water treatment and storage systems (HWTSs) remained effective for the provision of potable water.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 123888"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135425007961","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research involved a pilot field trial of household-based water treatment and storage for potable water in rural communities of Colombia and Mexico. Through co-creation with the communities, key parameters were considered when designing the systems, including the efficiency of disinfection, the provision of a sufficient volume of treated water, variability of the raw water quality and access to freshwater sources. The water treatment systems were automated with electronic controllers. They consisted of a sedimentation tank (bottom), a treatment unit (pre-filtration followed by UVC disinfection), a pump to move the treated water to a second elevated tank for storing the treated water (150 L or 250 L), and a small distribution network that provided water inside the home by gravity (kitchen and bathroom taps). They were installed at households in rural communities of Colombia (52 systems) and Mexico (187 systems) and the performance was evaluated over 12 consecutive months. Efficiency was evaluated using standard microbial and physicochemical water quality parameters. Treated water turbidity was below the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation (< 5 NTU) in >97 % of the samples in Colombia and 98.9 % in Mexico. The treatment reduced Escherichia coli to potable levels in all cases, regardless of the initial microbiological load and the variation of the raw water quality. In some cases, an increase in E. coli values was detected in the distribution network within the households (post-storage), although not statistically significant, they represented a ‘moderate risk’. The health risk associated with the water was reduced to ‘low risk’ in >80 % of the treated water samples vs. <10 % before treatment. After 12 months of operation, the household water treatment and storage systems (HWTSs) remained effective for the provision of potable water.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.