Addressing Acceleration Areas for Renewable Energy Development in the European Union (EU): A Case Study of Mainland Portugal

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Pilar Díaz-Cuevas, Belén Pérez-Pérez, Hélder Silva Lopes, Paula Ferreira
{"title":"Addressing Acceleration Areas for Renewable Energy Development in the European Union (EU): A Case Study of Mainland Portugal","authors":"Pilar Díaz-Cuevas, Belén Pérez-Pérez, Hélder Silva Lopes, Paula Ferreira","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The urgent need to accelerate the energy transition in the European Union has made spatial planning a key tool for effective and equitable deployment of renewable energy. Directive (EU) 2023/2413 requires Member States to designate “renewable acceleration areas” where renewable projects can be rapidly implemented with minimal environmental impact. However, the methodological basis for identifying such areas remains underdeveloped and uneven across countries. This paper proposes a methodological framework for identing these areas using the case of wind energy implementation in mainland Portugal, with implications for other EU countries. Results show that, under the most restrictive scenario, wind energy development is incompatible or highly inadvisable in 95% of the territory. Still, land remains available for installing 11,513 turbines, equating to 23,026 MW (assuming 2 MW per turbine). A less conservative interpretation of slope restrictions would allow for the installation of 616 additional turbines. These findings highlight that particular attention should be paid to technical criteria, such as slope, in the same way that environmental protection and population-related factors are critically reviewed. It also emphasizes the need to assess “incompatible” areas more critically, categorizing them by the type and number of constraints. Proximity to energy demand is highlighted as a key factor for enhancing self-sufficiency and reducing externalities. Finally, it is recommended that suitability weightings be delegated to local planners, fostering flexibility and local empowerment with the involvement of experts familiar with the territory to be planned. This approach promotes balanced and flexible renewable energy zoning to the implementation of EU renewable energy targets and planning mandates.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145748","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The urgent need to accelerate the energy transition in the European Union has made spatial planning a key tool for effective and equitable deployment of renewable energy. Directive (EU) 2023/2413 requires Member States to designate “renewable acceleration areas” where renewable projects can be rapidly implemented with minimal environmental impact. However, the methodological basis for identifying such areas remains underdeveloped and uneven across countries. This paper proposes a methodological framework for identing these areas using the case of wind energy implementation in mainland Portugal, with implications for other EU countries. Results show that, under the most restrictive scenario, wind energy development is incompatible or highly inadvisable in 95% of the territory. Still, land remains available for installing 11,513 turbines, equating to 23,026 MW (assuming 2 MW per turbine). A less conservative interpretation of slope restrictions would allow for the installation of 616 additional turbines. These findings highlight that particular attention should be paid to technical criteria, such as slope, in the same way that environmental protection and population-related factors are critically reviewed. It also emphasizes the need to assess “incompatible” areas more critically, categorizing them by the type and number of constraints. Proximity to energy demand is highlighted as a key factor for enhancing self-sufficiency and reducing externalities. Finally, it is recommended that suitability weightings be delegated to local planners, fostering flexibility and local empowerment with the involvement of experts familiar with the territory to be planned. This approach promotes balanced and flexible renewable energy zoning to the implementation of EU renewable energy targets and planning mandates.
探讨欧盟可再生能源发展的加速领域:以葡萄牙内地为例
加速欧洲联盟能源转型的迫切需要使空间规划成为有效和公平地部署可再生能源的关键工具。欧盟第2023/2413号指令要求成员国指定“可再生加速区”,在那里可再生能源项目可以在对环境影响最小的情况下迅速实施。然而,确定这些地区的方法基础仍然不发达,各国之间也不均衡。本文提出了一个方法框架,以葡萄牙大陆的风能实施为例,确定这些地区,并对其他欧盟国家产生影响。结果表明,在最严格的情况下,95%的领土上的风能开发是不相容的或非常不可取的。尽管如此,仍有土地可供安装11513台涡轮机,相当于23,026兆瓦(假设每台涡轮机2兆瓦)。对坡度限制的不那么保守的解释将允许安装616台额外的涡轮机。这些调查结果突出表明,应特别注意诸如坡度等技术标准,就像严格审查环境保护和与人口有关的因素一样。它还强调需要更严格地评价“不相容”的领域,按限制因素的类型和数量对它们进行分类。报告强调,接近能源需求是提高自给自足和减少外部性的关键因素。最后,建议将适当性加权权下放给当地规划人员,在熟悉待规划领土的专家的参与下,促进灵活性和赋予当地权力。这种方法促进了平衡和灵活的可再生能源分区,以实施欧盟可再生能源目标和规划任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信