Diagnostic Risk Prediction Models for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.4
Tyler Seyhan Saunders, Pawandeep Virpal, Maria Andreou, Asha Parmar, Christina Derksen, Oleg Blyuss, Fiona M Walter, Garth Funston
{"title":"Diagnostic Risk Prediction Models for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Tyler Seyhan Saunders, Pawandeep Virpal, Maria Andreou, Asha Parmar, Christina Derksen, Oleg Blyuss, Fiona M Walter, Garth Funston","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers are often detected late. Risk prediction models could facilitate earlier detection by identifying patients at risk for further investigation. We systematically reviewed evidence on UGI diagnostic risk prediction models. A search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was conducted for studies reporting on the development and/or validation of diagnostic risk prediction models for UGI cancers (pancreatic, gastric, esophageal, gallbladder, and/or biliary tract). Studies had to report at least one quantitative measure of model performance to be eligible for inclusion. A total of 82 studies describing 162 UGI risk models were included. Models predicted gallbladder (n = 6), gastric (n = 25), esophageal (n = 34), gastroesophageal (n = 14), and pancreatic (n = 83) cancers. Most models used logistic regression, but machine learning was increasingly used from 2019. In total, 366 unique variables were incorporated across models. Only 33 models were externally validated, with 15 achieving an AUC ≥0.80. This review highlights that several models perform well in predicting UGI cancers on external validation. Future research is needed to compare the best-performing models and assess their clinical utility, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness. Given the significant overlap in at-risk populations and predictors across UGI cancers, there may also be scope to develop UGI \"multicancer\" models.</p>","PeriodicalId":520580,"journal":{"name":"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1240-1251"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers are often detected late. Risk prediction models could facilitate earlier detection by identifying patients at risk for further investigation. We systematically reviewed evidence on UGI diagnostic risk prediction models. A search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was conducted for studies reporting on the development and/or validation of diagnostic risk prediction models for UGI cancers (pancreatic, gastric, esophageal, gallbladder, and/or biliary tract). Studies had to report at least one quantitative measure of model performance to be eligible for inclusion. A total of 82 studies describing 162 UGI risk models were included. Models predicted gallbladder (n = 6), gastric (n = 25), esophageal (n = 34), gastroesophageal (n = 14), and pancreatic (n = 83) cancers. Most models used logistic regression, but machine learning was increasingly used from 2019. In total, 366 unique variables were incorporated across models. Only 33 models were externally validated, with 15 achieving an AUC ≥0.80. This review highlights that several models perform well in predicting UGI cancers on external validation. Future research is needed to compare the best-performing models and assess their clinical utility, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness. Given the significant overlap in at-risk populations and predictors across UGI cancers, there may also be scope to develop UGI "multicancer" models.

上消化道肿瘤的诊断风险预测模型:系统综述。
上胃肠道(UGI)癌症通常发现较晚。风险预测模型可以通过识别有进一步调查风险的患者来促进早期发现。我们系统地回顾了UGI诊断风险预测模型的证据。对MEDLINE、Embase和CENTRAL进行了检索,以报告UGI癌症(胰腺、胃、食管癌、胆囊和/或胆道)的诊断风险预测模型的开发和/或验证。研究必须报告至少一种模型性能的定量测量才有资格纳入。共纳入了82项研究,描述了162种UGI风险模型。模型预测了胆囊癌(n=6)、胃癌(n=25)、食管癌(n=34)、胃食管癌(n=14)和胰腺癌(n=83)。大多数模型使用逻辑回归,但从2019年开始越来越多地使用机器学习。总共有366个独特的变量被纳入各个模型。只有33个模型进行了外部验证,其中15个模型的AUC≥0.80。这篇综述强调了几个模型在预测UGI癌症方面表现良好,并得到了外部验证。未来的研究需要比较表现最好的模型,并评估其临床效用,可接受性和成本效益。考虑到UGI癌症的高危人群和预测因素的显著重叠,也可能有开发UGI“多癌症”模型的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信