Efficacy and Safety of a Continuous Intravenous Insulin Protocol Modified for East Asians in Postoperative Glycemic Management Following Pancreatectomy.
Hironobu Sasaki, Kazuma Yagi, Ryota Kogure, Masayuki Honda, Dal Ho Kim
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of a Continuous Intravenous Insulin Protocol Modified for East Asians in Postoperative Glycemic Management Following Pancreatectomy.","authors":"Hironobu Sasaki, Kazuma Yagi, Ryota Kogure, Masayuki Honda, Dal Ho Kim","doi":"10.7759/cureus.84527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Glycemic control following pancreatectomy presents challenges, especially in patients with diabetes due to a lack of endogenous insulin, however, optimal management remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a continuous intravenous insulin infusion protocol employed at our institution, in comparison with conventional glycemic control in patients with pancreatectomy. Materials and methods Sixty-one patients with preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 6.5% or higher, on diabetes medications, or who underwent total pancreatectomy were included. Patients were categorized into three groups: insulin protocol (IP group, <i>n</i> = 24), subcutaneous injection (SI group, <i>n</i> = 15), and continuous intravenous insulin infusion based on the empirical control (EC group, <i>n</i> = 22). The primary outcomes were average blood glucose levels and the proportion of achievement within the target blood glucose range (140-180 mg/dl). Additionally, factors associated with the insulin dose in the IP group were analyzed. Results At predefined time points, the IP group achieved a significantly higher proportion of the target blood glucose range than the SI group (46.2% vs. 31.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.01), with no significant difference in average blood glucose levels (164.1 ± 41.8 vs. 169.1 ± 51.0 mg/dl, <i>p</i> = 0.50). During the 60-hour period following the initiation of frequent blood glucose measurements, the IP group demonstrated significantly reduced average blood glucose levels than the EC group (170.1 ± 56.0 vs. 175.5 ± 43.5 mg/dl, <i>p</i> <0.001), despite significantly longer measurement intervals (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.2 ± 0.7 hours, <i>p</i> <0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the proportion of the target blood glucose range between the IP and EC groups (37.2% vs. 41.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.11). Aspartate transaminase and alanine transferase levels on postoperative day one were positively correlated with the average insulin dose in the IP group (both <i>R</i> = 0.45, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Conclusions This IP helped stabilize blood glucose levels compared to subcutaneous injections and improved glycemic control more effectively than empirically administered continuous intravenous insulin infusion. Postoperative elevations in liver enzymes may serve as predictors of increased insulin requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 5","pages":"e84527"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.84527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction Glycemic control following pancreatectomy presents challenges, especially in patients with diabetes due to a lack of endogenous insulin, however, optimal management remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a continuous intravenous insulin infusion protocol employed at our institution, in comparison with conventional glycemic control in patients with pancreatectomy. Materials and methods Sixty-one patients with preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 6.5% or higher, on diabetes medications, or who underwent total pancreatectomy were included. Patients were categorized into three groups: insulin protocol (IP group, n = 24), subcutaneous injection (SI group, n = 15), and continuous intravenous insulin infusion based on the empirical control (EC group, n = 22). The primary outcomes were average blood glucose levels and the proportion of achievement within the target blood glucose range (140-180 mg/dl). Additionally, factors associated with the insulin dose in the IP group were analyzed. Results At predefined time points, the IP group achieved a significantly higher proportion of the target blood glucose range than the SI group (46.2% vs. 31.6%, p = 0.01), with no significant difference in average blood glucose levels (164.1 ± 41.8 vs. 169.1 ± 51.0 mg/dl, p = 0.50). During the 60-hour period following the initiation of frequent blood glucose measurements, the IP group demonstrated significantly reduced average blood glucose levels than the EC group (170.1 ± 56.0 vs. 175.5 ± 43.5 mg/dl, p <0.001), despite significantly longer measurement intervals (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.2 ± 0.7 hours, p <0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the proportion of the target blood glucose range between the IP and EC groups (37.2% vs. 41.0%, p = 0.11). Aspartate transaminase and alanine transferase levels on postoperative day one were positively correlated with the average insulin dose in the IP group (both R = 0.45, p = 0.03). Conclusions This IP helped stabilize blood glucose levels compared to subcutaneous injections and improved glycemic control more effectively than empirically administered continuous intravenous insulin infusion. Postoperative elevations in liver enzymes may serve as predictors of increased insulin requirements.
胰切除术后的血糖控制面临挑战,特别是对于缺乏内源性胰岛素的糖尿病患者,然而,最佳管理仍不清楚。本研究评估了我院采用的持续静脉注射胰岛素方案的有效性和安全性,并与传统的胰切除术患者血糖控制进行了比较。材料与方法纳入61例术前糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)≥6.5%、接受糖尿病药物治疗或行全胰切除术的患者。将患者分为胰岛素方案组(IP组,n = 24)、皮下注射组(SI组,n = 15)和在经验对照基础上持续静脉输注胰岛素组(EC组,n = 22)。主要结局是平均血糖水平和达到目标血糖范围(140-180 mg/dl)的比例。此外,还分析了与IP组胰岛素剂量相关的因素。结果在预定时间点,IP组达到目标血糖范围的比例显著高于SI组(46.2%比31.6%,p = 0.01),而平均血糖水平无显著差异(164.1±41.8比169.1±51.0 mg/dl, p = 0.50)。在开始频繁血糖测量后的60小时内,IP组的平均血糖水平明显低于EC组(170.1±56.0 vs 175.5±43.5 mg/dl, p p p = 0.11)。IP组患者术后第1天天冬氨酸转氨酶和丙氨酸转氨酶水平与平均胰岛素剂量呈正相关(R = 0.45, p = 0.03)。结论:与皮下注射相比,这种IP有助于稳定血糖水平,并且比经验性连续静脉注射胰岛素更有效地改善血糖控制。术后肝酶升高可作为胰岛素需要量增加的预测指标。