Peri-implant Tissue Changes Around Maxillary Anterior Immediate Tooth Replacement With and Without Socket- Shield: 1-Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Hung-Chi Liao, Joseph Y K Kan, Kitichai Rungcharassaeng, Guo-Hao Lin, Joey Chen, Otto Zuhr, Markus Hürzeler, Jaime Lozada
{"title":"Peri-implant Tissue Changes Around Maxillary Anterior Immediate Tooth Replacement With and Without Socket- Shield: 1-Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Hung-Chi Liao, Joseph Y K Kan, Kitichai Rungcharassaeng, Guo-Hao Lin, Joey Chen, Otto Zuhr, Markus Hürzeler, Jaime Lozada","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate implant success rates and facial mucosal profile changes in maxillary single immediate implant placement and provisionalization with the socket-shield (IIPP+SS) technique and without the socket-shield (IIPP-SS) technique.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 30 dental implants in 25 patients were assigned to either the IIPP-SS group (15 implants) or the IIPP+SS (15 implants) group. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected preoperatively (T0) as well as at 2-week (T1), 6-month (T6), and 12-month (T12) postoperative follow-ups. The implant success rate, marginal bone level changes, facial mucosal level changes, and papilla level changes were evaluated at different time points. Facial mucosal profile changes were assessed individually for hard and soft tissue zones and as a whole using volumetric analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two implants were excluded (one patient dropped out and one implant failed) from the data analysis in this study, resulting in an overall implant success rate of 96.6% (28/29) after 1 year. Fewer facial mucosal profile changes were noted in the IIPP+SS group than in the IIPP-SS group; however, the difference was only marginally statistically significant (P = .06). No statistically significant difference was found in the facial mucosal level changes (P = .18) and papilla level changes (P = .67 for the mesial papilla level, P = .41 for the distal papilla level) between the IIPP-SS and IIPP+SS groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial, the IIPP+SS group appeared to maintain the implant facial mucosal profile slightly better than IIPP alone. Both treatment modalities provide clinically satisfactory outcomes biologically, functionally, and esthetically.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate implant success rates and facial mucosal profile changes in maxillary single immediate implant placement and provisionalization with the socket-shield (IIPP+SS) technique and without the socket-shield (IIPP-SS) technique.

Materials and methods: A total of 30 dental implants in 25 patients were assigned to either the IIPP-SS group (15 implants) or the IIPP+SS (15 implants) group. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected preoperatively (T0) as well as at 2-week (T1), 6-month (T6), and 12-month (T12) postoperative follow-ups. The implant success rate, marginal bone level changes, facial mucosal level changes, and papilla level changes were evaluated at different time points. Facial mucosal profile changes were assessed individually for hard and soft tissue zones and as a whole using volumetric analysis.

Results: Two implants were excluded (one patient dropped out and one implant failed) from the data analysis in this study, resulting in an overall implant success rate of 96.6% (28/29) after 1 year. Fewer facial mucosal profile changes were noted in the IIPP+SS group than in the IIPP-SS group; however, the difference was only marginally statistically significant (P = .06). No statistically significant difference was found in the facial mucosal level changes (P = .18) and papilla level changes (P = .67 for the mesial papilla level, P = .41 for the distal papilla level) between the IIPP-SS and IIPP+SS groups.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial, the IIPP+SS group appeared to maintain the implant facial mucosal profile slightly better than IIPP alone. Both treatment modalities provide clinically satisfactory outcomes biologically, functionally, and esthetically.

上颌前牙直接置换术前后种植体周围组织的变化:1年随机对照临床试验。
目的:评价采用牙套-屏蔽(IIPP+SS)技术和不采用牙套-屏蔽(IIPP-SS)技术的上颌单次即刻种植体放置和预备种植体的成功率和面部黏膜形态的变化。材料与方法:25例患者共30颗种植体,分为IIPP-SS组(15颗)和IIPP+SS组(15颗)。收集术前(T0)以及术后2周(T1)、6个月(T6)和12个月(T12)随访时的临床和影像学结果。观察不同时间点种植体成功率、边缘骨水平变化、面部黏膜水平变化、乳头水平变化。面部粘膜剖面变化分别评估硬组织和软组织区域,并使用体积分析作为整体。结果:本研究从数据分析中排除了2例种植体(1例患者退出,1例种植体失败),1年后整体种植成功率为96.6%(28/29)。与IIPP-SS组相比,IIPP+SS组的面部粘膜变化较少;然而,差异只有边际统计学意义(P = .06)。IIPP-SS组与IIPP+SS组的面部粘膜水平变化(P = 0.18)和乳头水平变化(近端乳头水平P = 0.67,远端乳头水平P = 0.41)差异无统计学意义。结论:在这项为期1年的随机对照临床试验的局限性内,IIPP+SS组似乎比单独IIPP组在维持种植体面部粘膜轮廓方面稍好。两种治疗方式在生物学、功能和美学方面都提供了令人满意的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信