[Adjuvant treatment for melanoma].

Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-22 DOI:10.1007/s00105-025-05510-3
Sebastian A Wohlfeil
{"title":"[Adjuvant treatment for melanoma].","authors":"Sebastian A Wohlfeil","doi":"10.1007/s00105-025-05510-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite adequate treatment the probability of recurrence of malignant melanoma is high in patients with corresponding risk factors. Adjuvant treatment significantly reduces this risk; however, the choice of the appropriate adjuvant treatment can be difficult.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This article presents the currently available adjuvant therapies (immune checkpoint inhibition with PD‑1 inhibitors and targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors) and a comparison of the effectiveness of treatment in stage III.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A literature search, a discussion of relevant approval studies and discussion of register data were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the available adjuvant therapies significantly reduce the risk of recurrence of malignant melanoma, approximately one quarter of the patients still experience recurrence within the first 2 years. Comparisons of clinical register data show that adjuvant targeted therapy for BRAF-mutated stage III melanoma is superior to PD‑1 inhibition. The final analysis of the COMBI-AD study, the approval trial of dabrafenib and trametinib, shows a survival benefit for melanomas with BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> mutations but not for BRAF<sup>V600K</sup> mutations compared to placebo .</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>New therapeutic approaches are urgently needed to further reduce the risk of recurrence of melanoma in the adjuvant setting. Therefore, suitable patients should be included in appropriate adjuvant clinical studies, if these are available at the respective sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":72786,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"339-344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-025-05510-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite adequate treatment the probability of recurrence of malignant melanoma is high in patients with corresponding risk factors. Adjuvant treatment significantly reduces this risk; however, the choice of the appropriate adjuvant treatment can be difficult.

Objectives: This article presents the currently available adjuvant therapies (immune checkpoint inhibition with PD‑1 inhibitors and targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors) and a comparison of the effectiveness of treatment in stage III.

Material and methods: A literature search, a discussion of relevant approval studies and discussion of register data were carried out.

Results: Although the available adjuvant therapies significantly reduce the risk of recurrence of malignant melanoma, approximately one quarter of the patients still experience recurrence within the first 2 years. Comparisons of clinical register data show that adjuvant targeted therapy for BRAF-mutated stage III melanoma is superior to PD‑1 inhibition. The final analysis of the COMBI-AD study, the approval trial of dabrafenib and trametinib, shows a survival benefit for melanomas with BRAFV600E mutations but not for BRAFV600K mutations compared to placebo .

Conclusion: New therapeutic approaches are urgently needed to further reduce the risk of recurrence of melanoma in the adjuvant setting. Therefore, suitable patients should be included in appropriate adjuvant clinical studies, if these are available at the respective sites.

[黑色素瘤的辅助治疗]。
背景:尽管有适当的治疗,但具有相应危险因素的恶性黑色素瘤患者的复发概率很高。辅助治疗可显著降低这种风险;然而,选择合适的辅助治疗是困难的。目的:本文介绍了目前可用的辅助治疗方法(PD‑1抑制剂的免疫检查点抑制和BRAF和MEK抑制剂的靶向治疗),并比较了III期治疗的有效性。材料和方法:进行文献检索、相关批准研究讨论和注册资料讨论。结果:尽管现有的辅助治疗显著降低了恶性黑色素瘤复发的风险,但仍有大约四分之一的患者在前2年内出现复发。临床登记数据的比较表明,braf突变的III期黑色素瘤的辅助靶向治疗优于PD‑1抑制。COMBI-AD研究的最终分析,即dabrafenib和trametinib的批准试验,显示与安慰剂相比,BRAFV600E突变的黑色素瘤的生存获益,而BRAFV600K突变的黑色素瘤则没有。结论:迫切需要新的治疗方法来进一步降低辅助环境下黑色素瘤复发的风险。因此,如果在相应的地点有适当的辅助临床研究,则应将合适的患者纳入适当的辅助临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信