Factors contributing to non-compliance with on-demand treatment guidelines in hereditary angioedema.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Stephen D Betschel, Jonny Peter, William Lumry, Hilary Longhurst, Constance H Katelaris, Sally van Kooten, Markus Heckmann, Neil Malloy, Julie Ulloa, Sherry Danese, Markus Magerl
{"title":"Factors contributing to non-compliance with on-demand treatment guidelines in hereditary angioedema.","authors":"Stephen D Betschel, Jonny Peter, William Lumry, Hilary Longhurst, Constance H Katelaris, Sally van Kooten, Markus Heckmann, Neil Malloy, Julie Ulloa, Sherry Danese, Markus Magerl","doi":"10.1186/s13223-025-00969-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by painful and potentially life-threatening tissue swelling due to a deficiency or dysfunction of the C1 esterase inhibitor protein. Despite the availability of comprehensive on-demand treatment guidelines, compliance to guideline recommendations remains suboptimal, resulting in persisting unmet need.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational, online survey was conducted between September 6, 2022, and October 19, 2022 to understand the behaviors and perspectives of individuals in the US with hereditary angioedema (HAE). Participants were recruited by the US Hereditary Angioedema Association and were eligible if they were US residents with clinician-diagnosed HAE type I or II and had experienced at least one HAE attack. The survey included multiple-choice, rank-order, and scale-based responses using a 5-point Likert scale for agreement and an 11-point Likert scale for anxiety. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel, summarizing continuous variables as means, medians, and ranges, and categorical variables as frequency distributions and percentages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 out of 155 participants completed the survey (mean age = 41 years; 80.4% female). Half of the respondents used both prophylaxis and on-demand therapy, while the other half used on-demand therapy only. Icatibant was the most commonly used on-demand treatment (78.5%). The survey revealed that 57% of respondents did not treat all HAE attacks, and only 14% treated attacks immediately. Delays in treatment were common, with a mean time to treatment of 2.4 h, and younger patients were less likely to carry on-demand treatment. Reasons for delaying treatment included the perceived severity of the attack, lack of on-demand treatment availability, and pain associated with treatment. Additionally, 32.7% of respondents experienced the return of an HAE attack after initial treatment, with those delaying treatment more likely to experience recurrence. The survey also found that delayed treatment led to more severe attacks and longer recovery times, impacting work, social activities, and overall quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although guidelines recommend early treatment of HAE attacks, many respondents do not treat immediately. This finding underscores the importance of incorporating open patient-physician communication to improve guideline compliance and the management of HAE.</p>","PeriodicalId":51302,"journal":{"name":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","volume":"21 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-025-00969-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by painful and potentially life-threatening tissue swelling due to a deficiency or dysfunction of the C1 esterase inhibitor protein. Despite the availability of comprehensive on-demand treatment guidelines, compliance to guideline recommendations remains suboptimal, resulting in persisting unmet need.

Methods: This observational, online survey was conducted between September 6, 2022, and October 19, 2022 to understand the behaviors and perspectives of individuals in the US with hereditary angioedema (HAE). Participants were recruited by the US Hereditary Angioedema Association and were eligible if they were US residents with clinician-diagnosed HAE type I or II and had experienced at least one HAE attack. The survey included multiple-choice, rank-order, and scale-based responses using a 5-point Likert scale for agreement and an 11-point Likert scale for anxiety. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel, summarizing continuous variables as means, medians, and ranges, and categorical variables as frequency distributions and percentages.

Results: A total of 107 out of 155 participants completed the survey (mean age = 41 years; 80.4% female). Half of the respondents used both prophylaxis and on-demand therapy, while the other half used on-demand therapy only. Icatibant was the most commonly used on-demand treatment (78.5%). The survey revealed that 57% of respondents did not treat all HAE attacks, and only 14% treated attacks immediately. Delays in treatment were common, with a mean time to treatment of 2.4 h, and younger patients were less likely to carry on-demand treatment. Reasons for delaying treatment included the perceived severity of the attack, lack of on-demand treatment availability, and pain associated with treatment. Additionally, 32.7% of respondents experienced the return of an HAE attack after initial treatment, with those delaying treatment more likely to experience recurrence. The survey also found that delayed treatment led to more severe attacks and longer recovery times, impacting work, social activities, and overall quality of life.

Conclusions: Although guidelines recommend early treatment of HAE attacks, many respondents do not treat immediately. This finding underscores the importance of incorporating open patient-physician communication to improve guideline compliance and the management of HAE.

导致遗传性血管性水肿患者不遵守按需治疗指南的因素。
背景:遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)是一种罕见的遗传性疾病,其特征是由于C1酯酶抑制剂蛋白缺乏或功能障碍导致疼痛和可能危及生命的组织肿胀。尽管有全面的按需治疗指南,但对指南建议的依从性仍然不是最佳的,导致持续的未满足需求。方法:这项观察性在线调查于2022年9月6日至2022年10月19日期间进行,旨在了解美国遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)患者的行为和观点。参与者由美国遗传性血管性水肿协会招募,如果他们是临床诊断为1型或2型HAE且至少经历过一次HAE发作的美国居民,则符合条件。该调查包括多项选择,等级顺序和基于量表的回答,使用5分李克特量表来表示同意,11分李克特量表来表示焦虑。使用Microsoft Excel进行统计分析,将连续变量汇总为均值、中位数和极差,将分类变量汇总为频率分布和百分比。结果:155名参与者中有107人完成了调查(平均年龄41岁;80.4%的女性)。一半的应答者同时使用预防和按需治疗,而另一半只使用按需治疗。依卡替班是最常用的按需治疗(78.5%)。调查显示,57%的应答者没有治疗所有HAE发作,只有14%的应答者立即治疗发作。治疗延误很常见,平均治疗时间为2.4小时,年轻患者不太可能接受按需治疗。延迟治疗的原因包括发作的严重程度,缺乏按需治疗的可用性,以及与治疗相关的疼痛。此外,32.7%的应答者在初次治疗后复发HAE发作,延迟治疗者更有可能复发。调查还发现,延迟治疗会导致更严重的发作和更长的恢复时间,影响工作、社交活动和整体生活质量。结论:尽管指南建议早期治疗HAE发作,但许多应答者并未立即治疗。这一发现强调了纳入开放的医患沟通以提高指南依从性和HAE管理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
96
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology (AACI), the official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (CSACI), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and treatment of allergic and immunologic disease. By offering a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions, AACI provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy and clinical immunology research and reviews amongst allergists, pulmonologists, immunologists and other physicians, healthcare workers, medical students and the public worldwide. AACI reports on basic research and clinically applied studies in the following areas and other related topics: asthma and occupational lung disease, rhinoconjunctivitis and rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic skin diseases, urticaria and angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis and food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, immune deficiency and autoimmunity, T cell and B cell functions, regulatory T cells, natural killer cells, mast cell and eosinophil functions, complement abnormalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信