Revascularization in chronic coronary syndrome: shifts in clinical practice guidelines.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Maria Servito, Weiang Yan, Jenny Namkoong, Dominique Vervoort, Stephen E Fremes
{"title":"Revascularization in chronic coronary syndrome: shifts in clinical practice guidelines.","authors":"Maria Servito, Weiang Yan, Jenny Namkoong, Dominique Vervoort, Stephen E Fremes","doi":"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The optimal revascularization strategy for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is rapidly evolving due to emerging evidence and technological advancements. This review will discuss the guidelines for the management of CCS, examining how they align with and respond to recent high-quality studies. We will also discuss the evolution of the guidelines and highlight key differences.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>While broad consensus exists between the most recent European and American guidelines, notable differences exist in the management of multivessel disease with preserved ejection fraction and left main disease. The role of the Heart Teams has become increasingly vital particularly when the guidelines do not fit the clinical scenarios, and the evidence is controversial.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Determining the optimal management strategy for patients with CCS requires careful consideration of anatomic complexity, comorbidities, and individual patient preferences. While advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and medical therapy have been widely discussed, it is equally important to contextualize these with emerging innovations in surgical revascularization. Techniques such as multiple arterial grafting and minimally invasive surgical approaches represent significant progress in coronary artery bypass surgery. Randomized trials that compare state-of-the-art percutaneous and surgical revascularization techniques are thus needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55197,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The optimal revascularization strategy for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is rapidly evolving due to emerging evidence and technological advancements. This review will discuss the guidelines for the management of CCS, examining how they align with and respond to recent high-quality studies. We will also discuss the evolution of the guidelines and highlight key differences.

Recent findings: While broad consensus exists between the most recent European and American guidelines, notable differences exist in the management of multivessel disease with preserved ejection fraction and left main disease. The role of the Heart Teams has become increasingly vital particularly when the guidelines do not fit the clinical scenarios, and the evidence is controversial.

Summary: Determining the optimal management strategy for patients with CCS requires careful consideration of anatomic complexity, comorbidities, and individual patient preferences. While advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and medical therapy have been widely discussed, it is equally important to contextualize these with emerging innovations in surgical revascularization. Techniques such as multiple arterial grafting and minimally invasive surgical approaches represent significant progress in coronary artery bypass surgery. Randomized trials that compare state-of-the-art percutaneous and surgical revascularization techniques are thus needed.

慢性冠脉综合征的血运重建术:临床实践指南的变化。
综述目的:由于新出现的证据和技术进步,慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)的最佳血运重建策略正在迅速发展。这篇综述将讨论CCS管理的指导方针,检查它们如何与最近的高质量研究相一致并作出反应。我们还将讨论指南的演变,并强调关键的区别。最新发现:虽然欧洲和美国的最新指南存在广泛共识,但在保留射血分数的多血管疾病和左主干疾病的治疗上存在显著差异。心脏小组的作用变得越来越重要,特别是当指导方针不符合临床情况时,证据是有争议的。摘要:确定CCS患者的最佳管理策略需要仔细考虑解剖复杂性、合并症和个体患者的偏好。虽然经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和药物治疗的进展已被广泛讨论,但将这些进展与外科血运重建术的新兴创新结合起来同样重要。多动脉移植和微创手术方法等技术代表了冠状动脉搭桥手术的重大进展。因此,需要随机试验来比较最先进的经皮和外科血运重建术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Cardiology
Current Opinion in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Cardiology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fourteen disciplines published across the year – including arrhythmias, molecular genetics, HDL cholesterol and clinical trials – every issue also contains annotated reference detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信