Caregiver accompaniment and non-abandonment in voluntary assisted dying: Phenomenological analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Natasha Michael, Jeanette Liebelt, Xavier Symons, David Kissane
{"title":"Caregiver accompaniment and non-abandonment in voluntary assisted dying: Phenomenological analysis.","authors":"Natasha Michael, Jeanette Liebelt, Xavier Symons, David Kissane","doi":"10.1017/S1478951525000501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Caregivers play a significant role in the process of Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD), reporting stances of support, opposition, or ambivalence. Though caregiver vulnerability is recognized, little is understood about how caregivers adjust when patients seek VAD. We sought to appreciate how bereaved caregivers of patients in organizations that did not participate in VAD processed and adapted to the challenges faced.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We purposefully recruited caregivers from cases reviewed in a retrospective study exploring how VAD impacted the quality of palliative care. We further expanded sampling to maximize diverse views. We used qualitative interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore unique caregiver perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three caregivers completed interviews. Most were female, Australian-born, retired, identified with no religion, bereaved for 1-3 years, and in a caregiving role for 1-5 years. Caregivers sought accompaniment and non-abandonment across all stages of VAD. Coping was enhanced through framing and reframing thought processes and reconciling values. Caregivers bore responsibility through heightened emotions and experienced isolation and anticipatory grief as they reconciled perceived societal attitudes. Caregivers additionally failed to understand the rationale behind organizational stances and were unable to articulate the moral conflicts that arose. Impartiality from professionals was valued for caregivers to sustain care for the patient.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Despite feelings of vulnerability and isolation, caregivers demonstrated benevolence, courage, and self-compassion, reframing and accommodating their concerns. Professional accompaniment and non-abandonment necessitate solidarity and empowerment, without necessarily enabling VAD. Findings demonstrated the need for individuals and organizations to clearly articulate their willingness to continue to accompany patients, regardless of their position on VAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951525000501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Caregivers play a significant role in the process of Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD), reporting stances of support, opposition, or ambivalence. Though caregiver vulnerability is recognized, little is understood about how caregivers adjust when patients seek VAD. We sought to appreciate how bereaved caregivers of patients in organizations that did not participate in VAD processed and adapted to the challenges faced.

Methods: We purposefully recruited caregivers from cases reviewed in a retrospective study exploring how VAD impacted the quality of palliative care. We further expanded sampling to maximize diverse views. We used qualitative interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore unique caregiver perspectives.

Results: Twenty-three caregivers completed interviews. Most were female, Australian-born, retired, identified with no religion, bereaved for 1-3 years, and in a caregiving role for 1-5 years. Caregivers sought accompaniment and non-abandonment across all stages of VAD. Coping was enhanced through framing and reframing thought processes and reconciling values. Caregivers bore responsibility through heightened emotions and experienced isolation and anticipatory grief as they reconciled perceived societal attitudes. Caregivers additionally failed to understand the rationale behind organizational stances and were unable to articulate the moral conflicts that arose. Impartiality from professionals was valued for caregivers to sustain care for the patient.

Significance of results: Despite feelings of vulnerability and isolation, caregivers demonstrated benevolence, courage, and self-compassion, reframing and accommodating their concerns. Professional accompaniment and non-abandonment necessitate solidarity and empowerment, without necessarily enabling VAD. Findings demonstrated the need for individuals and organizations to clearly articulate their willingness to continue to accompany patients, regardless of their position on VAD.

自愿协助死亡中的照顾者陪伴和非遗弃:现象学分析。
目的:护理者在自愿协助死亡(VAD)的过程中发挥重要作用,报告支持,反对或矛盾的立场。虽然人们认识到护理人员的脆弱性,但很少有人了解护理人员如何在患者寻求VAD时进行调整。我们试图了解在没有参与VAD的组织中,患者的家属照顾者如何处理和适应所面临的挑战。方法:我们有目的地从回顾性研究VAD如何影响姑息治疗质量的病例中招募护理人员。我们进一步扩大抽样范围,最大限度地提高意见的多样性。我们使用定性解释现象学分析来探索独特的照顾者视角。结果:23名护理人员完成访谈。大多数是女性,澳大利亚出生,退休,没有宗教信仰,失去亲人1-3年,照顾他人1-5年。护理人员在VAD的所有阶段都寻求陪伴和不遗弃。通过构建和重构思维过程以及协调价值观,应对能力得到了增强。照顾者在调和感知到的社会态度时,通过情绪高涨、经历孤立和预期的悲伤来承担责任。此外,护理人员未能理解组织立场背后的基本原理,也无法阐明由此产生的道德冲突。专业人员的公正性对于护理人员维持对患者的护理是有价值的。结果的意义:尽管感到脆弱和孤立,照顾者表现出仁慈、勇气和自我同情,重构和适应他们的担忧。专业的陪伴和不遗弃需要团结和授权,而不一定会导致VAD。研究结果表明,个人和组织需要清楚地表达他们愿意继续陪伴患者,无论他们对VAD的立场如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信