Trends in psychotropic medication across occupation types before and during the Covid-19 pandemic: a linked administrative data study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Finola Ferry, Lisa Kent, Michael Rosato, Emma Curran, Gerard Leavey
{"title":"Trends in psychotropic medication across occupation types before and during the Covid-19 pandemic: a linked administrative data study.","authors":"Finola Ferry, Lisa Kent, Michael Rosato, Emma Curran, Gerard Leavey","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02909-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Using linked administrative data, this study provides the first longitudinal analysis of mental health among workers across occupational groups prior to and during the Covid-19 pandemic. Eleven years of data were analysed to examine whether the pandemic period coincided with changes in psychotropic medication for workers across broad occupational groupings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from Northern Ireland (NI) Enhanced Prescribing Database (EPD) was linked with NI Longitudinal Study (NILS) to examine trends in anti-depressants, anxiolytics and hypnotics (2011-2021) among NI workers (N = 200,004) across nine major occupation groups. Quarterly prescriptions were examined prior to and during pandemic restrictions (Q1-2011 to Q4-2019; and Q1-2020 to Q4-2021, respectively). Auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models were trained to compare 'forecasted' and 'observed' rates during the pandemic period, stratified by occupational group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Q2-2020 coincided with lower-than-expected receipt of anxiolytics and anti-depressants for several broad occupation types. Receipt of anxiolytic prescriptions among managers, directors/senior officials dropped below expected levels for the three quarters from Q3-2020 to Q1-2021. Finally, a notable increase in anti-depressants for a prolonged period was found among staff in caring/leisure and related professions, as well as higher rates of hypnotics in Q2-2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study provides the first longitudinal examination of variation in mental health across occupation types prior to and during the Covid-19 pandemic, using available linked administrative data. Findings suggest that occupation type was an important pandemic-related stressor and point to potential higher risk occupations that could be the focus of targeted interventions in future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02909-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Using linked administrative data, this study provides the first longitudinal analysis of mental health among workers across occupational groups prior to and during the Covid-19 pandemic. Eleven years of data were analysed to examine whether the pandemic period coincided with changes in psychotropic medication for workers across broad occupational groupings.

Methods: Data from Northern Ireland (NI) Enhanced Prescribing Database (EPD) was linked with NI Longitudinal Study (NILS) to examine trends in anti-depressants, anxiolytics and hypnotics (2011-2021) among NI workers (N = 200,004) across nine major occupation groups. Quarterly prescriptions were examined prior to and during pandemic restrictions (Q1-2011 to Q4-2019; and Q1-2020 to Q4-2021, respectively). Auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models were trained to compare 'forecasted' and 'observed' rates during the pandemic period, stratified by occupational group.

Results: Q2-2020 coincided with lower-than-expected receipt of anxiolytics and anti-depressants for several broad occupation types. Receipt of anxiolytic prescriptions among managers, directors/senior officials dropped below expected levels for the three quarters from Q3-2020 to Q1-2021. Finally, a notable increase in anti-depressants for a prolonged period was found among staff in caring/leisure and related professions, as well as higher rates of hypnotics in Q2-2021.

Conclusion: Our study provides the first longitudinal examination of variation in mental health across occupation types prior to and during the Covid-19 pandemic, using available linked administrative data. Findings suggest that occupation type was an important pandemic-related stressor and point to potential higher risk occupations that could be the focus of targeted interventions in future pandemics.

在Covid-19大流行之前和期间,不同职业类型的精神药物使用趋势:一项相关的行政数据研究。
目的:本研究利用相关的行政数据,首次对Covid-19大流行之前和期间各职业群体工人的心理健康状况进行了纵向分析。分析了11年的数据,以检查大流行期间是否与广泛职业分组的工人精神药物的变化相吻合。方法:来自北爱尔兰(NI)增强处方数据库(EPD)的数据与NI纵向研究(NILS)相关联,以检查9个主要职业群体中NI工人(N = 200004)抗抑郁药、抗焦虑药和催眠药(2011-2021)的趋势。在大流行限制之前和期间审查了季度处方(2011年第一季度至2019年第四季度;以及2020年第一季度至2021年第四季度)。对自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)模型进行了训练,以比较大流行期间按职业类别分层的“预测”和“观察”发病率。结果:2020年第二季度,一些广泛的职业类型的抗焦虑药和抗抑郁药的使用低于预期。从2020年第三季度到2021年第一季度,管理人员、董事/高级官员的抗焦虑药物处方使用率低于预期水平。最后,在护理/休闲及相关行业的员工中,抗抑郁药的使用在较长时间内显著增加,催眠药的使用比例在2021年第二季度也有所上升。结论:我们的研究利用现有的相关行政数据,首次对Covid-19大流行之前和期间不同职业类型的心理健康差异进行了纵向检查。研究结果表明,职业类型是与大流行相关的重要压力源,并指出潜在的高风险职业可能成为未来大流行中有针对性干预的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信