Long-Term Diagnostic Stability of Autism Before the Concept of Spectrum: An Italian Hub-Center Experience.

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Valentina Iannuzzi, Virginia Giuberti, Debora Formisano, Michele Poletti
{"title":"Long-Term Diagnostic Stability of Autism Before the Concept of Spectrum: An Italian Hub-Center Experience.","authors":"Valentina Iannuzzi, Virginia Giuberti, Debora Formisano, Michele Poletti","doi":"10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The diagnosis of autism is considered more longitudinally stable compared to other diagnoses for children and adolescents, although significant heterogeneity in longitudinal outcomes emerges between studies based on temporal intervals and diagnostic instruments. The introduction of the concept of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) by DSM-5 may have impacted diagnostic stability. The current study aimed to investigate the longitudinal diagnostic stability of different diagnoses of autism according to the ICD-10 diagnostic system before the institutional move towards the utilization of a unique ASD diagnosis according to DSM-5.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective study based on medical records and the ELEA electronic database was performed on children attending the Autism Center of the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service of the Azienda USL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy, from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2015. Diagnostic stability was evaluated according to the diagnosis at follow-up, which was set at 10 years from baseline or December 31, 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 380 children were included at baseline, and 341 were included at follow-up (with a mean temporal interval of 8.74 ± 2.7 years). Among them, 251 individuals maintained a diagnosis within the F84 spectrum, resulting in a diagnostic stability of 73.6%. Specifically, diagnostic stability was 79.8% for the F84.0 diagnosis and 68.2% for the F84.9 diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Before the adoption of DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD, ICD-10 diagnoses related to autism were relatively stable in the long run, with an 8-year follow-up. The next step is to assess the longitudinal diagnostic stability of ASD after the adoption of DSM-5 criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":46700,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","volume":"22 2","pages":"121-124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The diagnosis of autism is considered more longitudinally stable compared to other diagnoses for children and adolescents, although significant heterogeneity in longitudinal outcomes emerges between studies based on temporal intervals and diagnostic instruments. The introduction of the concept of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) by DSM-5 may have impacted diagnostic stability. The current study aimed to investigate the longitudinal diagnostic stability of different diagnoses of autism according to the ICD-10 diagnostic system before the institutional move towards the utilization of a unique ASD diagnosis according to DSM-5.

Method: A retrospective study based on medical records and the ELEA electronic database was performed on children attending the Autism Center of the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service of the Azienda USL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy, from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2015. Diagnostic stability was evaluated according to the diagnosis at follow-up, which was set at 10 years from baseline or December 31, 2020.

Results: A total of 380 children were included at baseline, and 341 were included at follow-up (with a mean temporal interval of 8.74 ± 2.7 years). Among them, 251 individuals maintained a diagnosis within the F84 spectrum, resulting in a diagnostic stability of 73.6%. Specifically, diagnostic stability was 79.8% for the F84.0 diagnosis and 68.2% for the F84.9 diagnosis.

Conclusions: Before the adoption of DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD, ICD-10 diagnoses related to autism were relatively stable in the long run, with an 8-year follow-up. The next step is to assess the longitudinal diagnostic stability of ASD after the adoption of DSM-5 criteria.

谱系概念之前自闭症的长期诊断稳定性:意大利中心经验。
目的:与儿童和青少年的其他诊断相比,自闭症的诊断被认为更具纵向稳定性,尽管基于时间间隔和诊断工具的研究之间的纵向结果存在显着异质性。DSM-5中自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)概念的引入可能影响了诊断的稳定性。目前的研究旨在研究在机构转向根据DSM-5使用独特的ASD诊断之前,根据ICD-10诊断系统对不同自闭症诊断的纵向诊断稳定性。方法:对2005年1月1日至2015年12月31日在意大利雷吉欧艾米利亚Azienda USL-IRCCS儿童和青少年心理健康服务自闭症中心就诊的儿童进行回顾性研究。根据随访时的诊断评估诊断稳定性,随访时间设定为距基线10年或2020年12月31日。结果:基线时共纳入380名儿童,随访时纳入341名儿童(平均时间间隔为8.74±2.7年)。其中,251人在F84谱范围内保持诊断,诊断稳定性为73.6%。其中,F84.0诊断的诊断稳定性为79.8%,F84.9诊断的诊断稳定性为68.2%。结论:在采用DSM-5 ASD诊断标准之前,ICD-10与自闭症相关的诊断在长期内相对稳定,随访时间为8年。下一步是在采用DSM-5标准后评估ASD的纵向诊断稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychiatry
Clinical Neuropsychiatry CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信