LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation TRA Version 2024: Application on HCC Patients Treated With Ablation Treatment.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Jiaying Cao, Yi Dong, Xinliang Xu, Qi Zhang, Wenping Wang, Kathleen Möller, Christoph F Dietrich
{"title":"LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation TRA Version 2024: Application on HCC Patients Treated With Ablation Treatment.","authors":"Jiaying Cao, Yi Dong, Xinliang Xu, Qi Zhang, Wenping Wang, Kathleen Möller, Christoph F Dietrich","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.04.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Nonradiation treatment response assessment (TRA) categorization v2024 for detecting viable tumors of ablated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June 2020 and December 2022, standardized CEUS data of HCC patients were prospectively collected. A retrospective analysis of LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation TRA v2024 evaluation on HCCs was conducted by 2 independent radiologists assigning per-lesion TRA (TR-nonviable, TR-equivocal, or TR-viable) categorizations. Inter-reader agreement between the 2 readers and inter-modality agreement between LI-RADS CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA were assessed. The diagnostic performance of imaging criteria was explored. The potential influencing factors of LI-RADS TRA categorization across modalities were further analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 CEUS-LI-RADS TRA category evaluations of 88 lesions in 83 patients were included. Inter-reader agreement for the 2 readers were substantial to almost perfect (intralesional tumor viability: κ = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.76-1.0; perilesional tumor viability: κ = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.57-0.87; CEUS LR-TR: κ = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.55-0.88). Inter-modality agreements between CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA categorizations were excellent (ICC = 0.90). CEUS LR-TRA categorization demonstrated good diagnostic performance, particularly in specificity (88.1%-100 %) and negative predictive value (NPV: 93.9%-97.9 %). Time period and abstract shape were identified as significant factors influencing reader evaluations (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation TRA v2024 demonstrates fine inter-reader and inter-modality agreement, with outstanding diagnostic performance, supporting its potential for clinical application in assessing treatment response for ablated HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.04.018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Nonradiation treatment response assessment (TRA) categorization v2024 for detecting viable tumors of ablated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: Between June 2020 and December 2022, standardized CEUS data of HCC patients were prospectively collected. A retrospective analysis of LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation TRA v2024 evaluation on HCCs was conducted by 2 independent radiologists assigning per-lesion TRA (TR-nonviable, TR-equivocal, or TR-viable) categorizations. Inter-reader agreement between the 2 readers and inter-modality agreement between LI-RADS CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA were assessed. The diagnostic performance of imaging criteria was explored. The potential influencing factors of LI-RADS TRA categorization across modalities were further analyzed.

Results: A total of 101 CEUS-LI-RADS TRA category evaluations of 88 lesions in 83 patients were included. Inter-reader agreement for the 2 readers were substantial to almost perfect (intralesional tumor viability: κ = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.76-1.0; perilesional tumor viability: κ = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.57-0.87; CEUS LR-TR: κ = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.55-0.88). Inter-modality agreements between CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA categorizations were excellent (ICC = 0.90). CEUS LR-TRA categorization demonstrated good diagnostic performance, particularly in specificity (88.1%-100 %) and negative predictive value (NPV: 93.9%-97.9 %). Time period and abstract shape were identified as significant factors influencing reader evaluations (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation TRA v2024 demonstrates fine inter-reader and inter-modality agreement, with outstanding diagnostic performance, supporting its potential for clinical application in assessing treatment response for ablated HCC.

LI-RADS CEUS非放射TRA版本2024:在消融治疗的HCC患者中的应用
目的:评价肝影像报告与数据系统(LI-RADS)对比增强超声(CEUS)非放射治疗反应评估(TRA)分类v2024在消融型肝细胞癌(HCC)存活肿瘤检测中的应用价值。方法:前瞻性收集2020年6月至2022年12月HCC患者的标准化超声造影数据。2名独立放射科医生对LI-RADS CEUS非辐射TRA v2024对hcc的评估进行了回顾性分析,并对每个病变的TRA (tr -不可活、tr -模棱两可或tr -可活)进行了分类。评估2个阅读器之间的阅读器间一致性以及LI-RADS CEUS与CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA之间的模式间一致性。探讨影像学诊断标准的诊断性能。进一步分析LI-RADS TRA跨模式分类的潜在影响因素。结果:共纳入83例患者88个病灶101次CEUS-LI-RADS TRA分类评估。两种解读器之间的一致性基本达到近乎完美(病灶内肿瘤存活率:κ = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.76-1.0;病灶周围肿瘤存活率:κ = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.57 ~ 0.87;Ceus lr-tr: κ = 0.71, 95% ci: 0.55 ~ 0.88)。超声造影与CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA分类间的模式一致性非常好(ICC = 0.90)。CEUS LR-TRA分类具有良好的诊断效果,特别是特异性(88.1% ~ 100%)和阴性预测值(NPV: 93.9% ~ 97.9%)。时间和摘要形状是影响读者评价的显著因素(p < 0.05)。结论:LI-RADS CEUS非辐射TRA v2024具有良好的阅读器间和模式间一致性,具有出色的诊断性能,支持其在评估消融HCC治疗反应方面的临床应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信