Incorporating Structural Competency into Clinical Ethics: Piloting New Bioethics Education.

Q3 Medicine
Sara Kolmes, Ariana Thompson-Lastad, Kevin Dirksen, Kayla Tabari, Seth M Holmes
{"title":"Incorporating Structural Competency into Clinical Ethics: Piloting New Bioethics Education.","authors":"Sara Kolmes, Ariana Thompson-Lastad, Kevin Dirksen, Kayla Tabari, Seth M Holmes","doi":"10.1086/734776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractThe Liaison Committee on Medical Education recently adopted structural competency, an approach to understanding and responding to social factors in health and healthcare, as a required part of medical training. We have found that structural competency education shows promise for graduate and continuing bioethics education as well. In postgraduate bioethics education, structural competency focuses on the practical skills of identifying where social forces impact specific patients and how clinicians can respond. This can support clinical ethicists in their attempts to help clinicians identify, understand, and respond to ethical dilemmas caused by social forces, for example, the ways in which resource availability may influence a patient's opportunities and health options, and the impact of the built environment on the health hazards people encounter. We describe how one clinical ethics program integrated structural competency into bioethics education for medical residents and other clinicians. This structural competency education pilot received extremely positive feedback from participating clinicians. Ninety-seven percent of those who responded to evaluation surveys identified structural competency as \"valuable\" or \"very valuable\" to their clinical practice. When providing feedback on this education, clinicians described immediately incorporating structural competency strategies in ethically difficult patient care situations. We present a case study shared and developed by clinicians using these strategies to improve patient care. This practical use of structural competency education suggests that there may be benefits to integrating this approach into bioethics education. We suggest next steps for bioethics educators to further examine these educational strategies following our promising pilot.</p>","PeriodicalId":39646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ethics","volume":"36 2","pages":"158-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/734776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThe Liaison Committee on Medical Education recently adopted structural competency, an approach to understanding and responding to social factors in health and healthcare, as a required part of medical training. We have found that structural competency education shows promise for graduate and continuing bioethics education as well. In postgraduate bioethics education, structural competency focuses on the practical skills of identifying where social forces impact specific patients and how clinicians can respond. This can support clinical ethicists in their attempts to help clinicians identify, understand, and respond to ethical dilemmas caused by social forces, for example, the ways in which resource availability may influence a patient's opportunities and health options, and the impact of the built environment on the health hazards people encounter. We describe how one clinical ethics program integrated structural competency into bioethics education for medical residents and other clinicians. This structural competency education pilot received extremely positive feedback from participating clinicians. Ninety-seven percent of those who responded to evaluation surveys identified structural competency as "valuable" or "very valuable" to their clinical practice. When providing feedback on this education, clinicians described immediately incorporating structural competency strategies in ethically difficult patient care situations. We present a case study shared and developed by clinicians using these strategies to improve patient care. This practical use of structural competency education suggests that there may be benefits to integrating this approach into bioethics education. We suggest next steps for bioethics educators to further examine these educational strategies following our promising pilot.

将结构能力纳入临床伦理学:探索新的生命伦理学教育。
摘要近年来,医学教育联络委员会将结构胜任力作为一种理解和应对健康和医疗保健中的社会因素的方法,作为医学培训的必要组成部分。我们发现结构胜任力教育在研究生和继续生命伦理学教育中也表现出良好的前景。在研究生生物伦理学教育中,结构能力侧重于识别社会力量对特定患者的影响以及临床医生如何应对的实践技能。这可以支持临床伦理学家帮助临床医生识别、理解和应对由社会力量引起的伦理困境,例如,资源可用性可能影响患者机会和健康选择的方式,以及建筑环境对人们遇到的健康危害的影响。我们描述了一个临床伦理计划如何将结构能力整合到医疗住院医师和其他临床医生的生物伦理教育中。这个结构能力教育试点从参与的临床医生那里得到了非常积极的反馈。在接受评估调查的人中,有97%的人认为结构能力对他们的临床实践“有价值”或“非常有价值”。当提供对这种教育的反馈时,临床医生描述了在道德上困难的病人护理情况下立即纳入结构能力策略。我们提出了一个临床医生分享和开发的案例研究,使用这些策略来改善患者护理。这种结构能力教育的实际应用表明,将这种方法整合到生物伦理学教育中可能会有好处。我们建议生命伦理学教育者下一步要进一步研究这些教育策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Ethics
Journal of Clinical Ethics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ethics is written for and by physicians, nurses, attorneys, clergy, ethicists, and others whose decisions directly affect patients. More than 70 percent of the articles are authored or co-authored by physicians. JCE is a double-blinded, peer-reviewed journal indexed in PubMed, Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, the Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, and other indexes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信