Understanding Dermatologists' Acceptance of Digital Health Interventions: Cross-Sectional Survey and Cluster Analysis.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI:10.2196/59757
Patrick Reinders, Matthias Augustin, Marina Otten
{"title":"Understanding Dermatologists' Acceptance of Digital Health Interventions: Cross-Sectional Survey and Cluster Analysis.","authors":"Patrick Reinders, Matthias Augustin, Marina Otten","doi":"10.2196/59757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital health interventions (DHIs) have the potential to enhance dermatological care by improving quality, patient empowerment, and efficiency. However, adoption remains limited, particularly in Germany.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explores German dermatologists' attitudes toward DHIs, clustering them by acceptance levels and analyzing differences in sociodemographics and current and future DHI use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey, randomly inviting 1000 dermatologists in Germany to participate. The questionnaire consisted of Likert scale items rating the acceptability of DHIs from 1 to 5. Items on the current and future use of DHIs were also included. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify factors and reduce data as input for a 2-step clustering algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey with 170 dermatologists (mean age 50.8, SD 10.3 y; 74/167, 55.7% female) identified four factors through the exploratory factor analysis: (1) \"Positive Expectancies and Acceptability of DHIs,\" (2) \"Dermatologists' Digital Competencies,\" (3) \"Negative Expectancies and Barriers,\" and (4) \"Dermatologists' Perspectives on Patients' Acceptability and Competencies.\" The analysis identified three distinct clusters: (1) Indecisives (n=69)-moderate intentions to use DHIs and moderate negative expectations toward them; (2) Adopters (n=60)-high intentions to use DHIs and high digital competencies; and (3) Rejectors (n=26)-low intentions to use DHIs and low digital competencies. Adopters were significantly younger, more often based in urban centers, and exhibited the highest adoption rates of DHIs compared to the other clusters. Across all clusters, inadequate reimbursement and perceived structural barriers were cited as significant challenges to DHI adoption. Still, only one-third of the Adopters used DHIs including teledermatology or artificial intelligence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dermatologists in Germany exhibited varied levels of acceptance and readiness for DHIs, with demographic and structural factors influencing adoption. Addressing barriers such as reimbursement and investing in digital literacy could promote wider use, potentially reducing health inequalities by improving access to digital health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"12 ","pages":"e59757"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital health interventions (DHIs) have the potential to enhance dermatological care by improving quality, patient empowerment, and efficiency. However, adoption remains limited, particularly in Germany.

Objective: This study explores German dermatologists' attitudes toward DHIs, clustering them by acceptance levels and analyzing differences in sociodemographics and current and future DHI use.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey, randomly inviting 1000 dermatologists in Germany to participate. The questionnaire consisted of Likert scale items rating the acceptability of DHIs from 1 to 5. Items on the current and future use of DHIs were also included. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify factors and reduce data as input for a 2-step clustering algorithm.

Results: The survey with 170 dermatologists (mean age 50.8, SD 10.3 y; 74/167, 55.7% female) identified four factors through the exploratory factor analysis: (1) "Positive Expectancies and Acceptability of DHIs," (2) "Dermatologists' Digital Competencies," (3) "Negative Expectancies and Barriers," and (4) "Dermatologists' Perspectives on Patients' Acceptability and Competencies." The analysis identified three distinct clusters: (1) Indecisives (n=69)-moderate intentions to use DHIs and moderate negative expectations toward them; (2) Adopters (n=60)-high intentions to use DHIs and high digital competencies; and (3) Rejectors (n=26)-low intentions to use DHIs and low digital competencies. Adopters were significantly younger, more often based in urban centers, and exhibited the highest adoption rates of DHIs compared to the other clusters. Across all clusters, inadequate reimbursement and perceived structural barriers were cited as significant challenges to DHI adoption. Still, only one-third of the Adopters used DHIs including teledermatology or artificial intelligence.

Conclusions: Dermatologists in Germany exhibited varied levels of acceptance and readiness for DHIs, with demographic and structural factors influencing adoption. Addressing barriers such as reimbursement and investing in digital literacy could promote wider use, potentially reducing health inequalities by improving access to digital health care.

了解皮肤科医生对数字健康干预的接受程度:横断面调查和聚类分析。
背景:数字健康干预(DHIs)有可能通过提高质量、患者赋权和效率来加强皮肤科护理。然而,采用率仍然有限,尤其是在德国。目的:本研究探讨德国皮肤科医生对DHIs的态度,通过接受程度对他们进行聚类,并分析社会人口统计学和当前和未来DHI使用的差异。方法:采用横断面调查,随机邀请1000名德国皮肤科医生参与。问卷由李克特量表项目组成,从1到5评定DHIs的可接受性。关于DHIs目前和未来使用的项目也包括在内。探索性因子分析用于识别因素并减少数据作为两步聚类算法的输入。结果:接受调查的皮肤科医生170人(平均年龄50.8岁,SD 10.3 y;74/167, 55.7%女性)通过探索性因素分析确定了四个因素:(1)“DHIs的积极期望和可接受性”(2)“皮肤科医生的数字能力”(3)“消极期望和障碍”和(4)“皮肤科医生对患者可接受性和能力的看法。”分析确定了三个不同的集群:(1)优柔寡断者(n=69)-使用DHIs的意图中等,对他们的负面期望中等;(2)采用者(n=60)-使用DHIs的意愿高,数字能力强;(3)拒绝者(n=26)-使用DHIs的意愿低,数字能力低。采用者明显更年轻,更常居住在城市中心,与其他集群相比,DHIs的采用率最高。在所有分类中,报销不足和感知到的结构性障碍被认为是采用DHI的重大挑战。尽管如此,只有三分之一的采用者使用了DHIs,包括远程皮肤科或人工智能。结论:德国皮肤科医生对DHIs的接受程度和准备程度各不相同,人口统计学和结构因素影响了采用程度。解决诸如报销和投资于数字素养等障碍可以促进更广泛的使用,并有可能通过改善获得数字保健的机会来减少健康不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信