Association between quality performance scorecard scores and health indicators: an ecological study in the Northern provinces of the Lao People's Democratic Republic.

IF 3.6 Q1 TROPICAL MEDICINE
Vixayyang Chayvangmanh, Noudéhouénou Credo Adelphe Ahissou, Khamsay Detleuxay, Daisuke Nonaka
{"title":"Association between quality performance scorecard scores and health indicators: an ecological study in the Northern provinces of the Lao People's Democratic Republic.","authors":"Vixayyang Chayvangmanh, Noudéhouénou Credo Adelphe Ahissou, Khamsay Detleuxay, Daisuke Nonaka","doi":"10.1186/s41182-025-00748-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Ministry of Health, Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), surveyed health centers using the Quality Performance Scorecard (QPS) tool in 2021 to assess the quality of healthcare services at health centers. To validate the QPS tool, this study assessed the association between the QPS scores obtained from each health center and outpatient department (OPD) visits, antenatal care (ANC) coverages, and under-five mortality rates (U5MR) in the health centers' catchment area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This ecological study assessed the association between the QPS scores as an independent variable and OPD visits, coverage of ANC at least one visit (ANC1), coverage of ANC four or more visits (ANC4) and U5MR as a dependent variable, using secondary data collected from the 234 health centers and 31 district health offices in the four northern provinces, such as Huaphan, Xiengkhuang, Oudomxay and Phongsaly. Mixed-effect linear regression was used to assess the association between the independent variable and dependent variables while adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean value (standard deviation) was 64.9/100 (14.3) for QPS score, 3.3 (3.6) for U5MR (per 1,000 under-five population), 0.7 (0.5) for OPD visits (per population), 9.6 (6.0) for ANC1 coverage (per estimated number of reproductive-aged women) and 5.7 (4.4) for ANC4 coverage. The QPS scores were significantly independently associated with U5MR (unstandardized regression coefficient: -0.225 and standardized regression coefficient: -0.894), OPD visits (-0.004 and -0.114) and ANC4 coverage (-0.036 and -0.117).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that with increasing level of quality of healthcare services as measured by QPS, the U5MR was decreasing. The association demonstrated the ability of the QPS tool to capture the quality of healthcare services at health centers. Although the QPS scores were also negatively associated with OPD visits and ANC4 coverage, these associations were weak and likely confounded by unmeasured factors, or explained by quality care potentially reducing patients' perceived need for frequents visits. To further validate the QPS tool, a longitudinal study is recommended to confirm the findings and address unmeasured factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":23311,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine and Health","volume":"53 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-025-00748-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TROPICAL MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Ministry of Health, Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), surveyed health centers using the Quality Performance Scorecard (QPS) tool in 2021 to assess the quality of healthcare services at health centers. To validate the QPS tool, this study assessed the association between the QPS scores obtained from each health center and outpatient department (OPD) visits, antenatal care (ANC) coverages, and under-five mortality rates (U5MR) in the health centers' catchment area.

Methods: This ecological study assessed the association between the QPS scores as an independent variable and OPD visits, coverage of ANC at least one visit (ANC1), coverage of ANC four or more visits (ANC4) and U5MR as a dependent variable, using secondary data collected from the 234 health centers and 31 district health offices in the four northern provinces, such as Huaphan, Xiengkhuang, Oudomxay and Phongsaly. Mixed-effect linear regression was used to assess the association between the independent variable and dependent variables while adjusting for covariates.

Results: The mean value (standard deviation) was 64.9/100 (14.3) for QPS score, 3.3 (3.6) for U5MR (per 1,000 under-five population), 0.7 (0.5) for OPD visits (per population), 9.6 (6.0) for ANC1 coverage (per estimated number of reproductive-aged women) and 5.7 (4.4) for ANC4 coverage. The QPS scores were significantly independently associated with U5MR (unstandardized regression coefficient: -0.225 and standardized regression coefficient: -0.894), OPD visits (-0.004 and -0.114) and ANC4 coverage (-0.036 and -0.117).

Conclusion: This study shows that with increasing level of quality of healthcare services as measured by QPS, the U5MR was decreasing. The association demonstrated the ability of the QPS tool to capture the quality of healthcare services at health centers. Although the QPS scores were also negatively associated with OPD visits and ANC4 coverage, these associations were weak and likely confounded by unmeasured factors, or explained by quality care potentially reducing patients' perceived need for frequents visits. To further validate the QPS tool, a longitudinal study is recommended to confirm the findings and address unmeasured factors.

质量绩效记分卡得分与健康指标之间的关系:老挝人民民主共和国北部各省的生态研究。
背景:老挝人民民主共和国(Lao PDR)卫生部于2021年使用质量绩效记分卡(QPS)工具对卫生中心进行了调查,以评估卫生中心的卫生服务质量。为了验证QPS工具,本研究评估了从每个卫生中心获得的QPS评分与卫生中心集水区门诊部(OPD)访问量、产前护理(ANC)覆盖率和五岁以下儿童死亡率(U5MR)之间的关系。方法:本生态研究利用华北四省(华潘、湘黄、乌多姆塞和丰沙里)234个卫生中心和31个区卫生所的二次数据,评估QPS评分作为自变量与门诊就诊次数、ANC至少一次就诊覆盖率(ANC1)、ANC四次及以上就诊覆盖率(ANC4)和U5MR作为因变量的相关性。混合效应线性回归用于评估自变量和因变量之间的相关性,同时调整协变量。结果:QPS评分的平均值(标准差)为64.9/100 (14.3),U5MR(每1000名5岁以下人口)为3.3 (3.6),OPD就诊(每人口)为0.7 (0.5),ANC1覆盖率(每估计育龄妇女人数)为9.6 (6.0),ANC4覆盖率为5.7(4.4)。QPS评分与U5MR(非标准化回归系数:-0.225,标准化回归系数:-0.894)、OPD访问(-0.004和-0.114)和ANC4覆盖率(-0.036和-0.117)显著独立相关。结论:本研究表明,随着QPS衡量的医疗服务质量水平的提高,U5MR呈下降趋势。该协会展示了QPS工具捕捉保健中心医疗保健服务质量的能力。虽然QPS评分也与门诊就诊和ANC4覆盖率呈负相关,但这些关联很弱,可能被未测量的因素混淆,或者被高质量的护理可能减少患者对频繁就诊的感知需求所解释。为了进一步验证QPS工具,建议进行纵向研究以确认研究结果并解决未测量的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine and Health
Tropical Medicine and Health TROPICAL MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信