Risk Factor Analysis and Risk Prediction Model Construction of Ossification Progression after Postoperative Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.
Changlin Lv, Jianyi Li, Jianwei Guo, Tianyu Bai, Xiaofan Du, Guodong Zhang, Jiale Shao, Han Zhang, Wenkang Yang, Shiqi Xu, Yukun Du, Jun Dong, Yongming Xi
{"title":"Risk Factor Analysis and Risk Prediction Model Construction of Ossification Progression after Postoperative Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.","authors":"Changlin Lv, Jianyi Li, Jianwei Guo, Tianyu Bai, Xiaofan Du, Guodong Zhang, Jiale Shao, Han Zhang, Wenkang Yang, Shiqi Xu, Yukun Du, Jun Dong, Yongming Xi","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a nomogram to predict the progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) after surgery, identify potential risk factors, and provide a theoretical basis for preventing postoperative ossification progression.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>OPLL is a degenerative condition prevalent in Asian populations, leading to spinal cord and nerve root compression. While surgery is the primary treatment, postoperative ossification progression, particularly after posterior surgeries, remains a challenge, potentially requiring reoperation. Current methods for predicting risk factors rely on clinical experience, highlighting the need for a multi-dimensional prediction model to identify at-risk patients and improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 271 patients who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery for OPLL. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify independent risk factors for postoperative ossification progression. A nomogram was constructed based on these factors. The model's performance was evaluated using the C-index, ROC curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with validation conducted using data from a separate group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified four independent risk factors for ossification progression after OPLL. A nomogram was subsequently constructed based on these factors. The C-index values in both the training and validation groups demonstrated high accuracy and stability of the model. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) indicated excellent discriminative ability, while the calibration curves showed high agreement between predicted and observed outcomes in both groups. The decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram provided the highest net clinical benefit within a probability threshold range 0.01-1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Younger patients with OPLL, greater initial ossification thickness, more than three affected levels, or continuous/mixed ossification types are at higher risk of postoperative progression. The nomogram provides clinicians with an effective tool to predict and prevent postoperative ossification progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005286","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective analysis.
Objective: To develop a nomogram to predict the progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) after surgery, identify potential risk factors, and provide a theoretical basis for preventing postoperative ossification progression.
Summary of background data: OPLL is a degenerative condition prevalent in Asian populations, leading to spinal cord and nerve root compression. While surgery is the primary treatment, postoperative ossification progression, particularly after posterior surgeries, remains a challenge, potentially requiring reoperation. Current methods for predicting risk factors rely on clinical experience, highlighting the need for a multi-dimensional prediction model to identify at-risk patients and improve outcomes.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 271 patients who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery for OPLL. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify independent risk factors for postoperative ossification progression. A nomogram was constructed based on these factors. The model's performance was evaluated using the C-index, ROC curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with validation conducted using data from a separate group.
Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified four independent risk factors for ossification progression after OPLL. A nomogram was subsequently constructed based on these factors. The C-index values in both the training and validation groups demonstrated high accuracy and stability of the model. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) indicated excellent discriminative ability, while the calibration curves showed high agreement between predicted and observed outcomes in both groups. The decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram provided the highest net clinical benefit within a probability threshold range 0.01-1.
Conclusion: Younger patients with OPLL, greater initial ossification thickness, more than three affected levels, or continuous/mixed ossification types are at higher risk of postoperative progression. The nomogram provides clinicians with an effective tool to predict and prevent postoperative ossification progression.
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.