Dialysis Social Workers' Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Kidney Transplantation.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Progress in Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-22 DOI:10.1177/15269248251343378
Gloria Chen, Liana Petruzzi, Amanda Ryan, Chandi Mulchand, Lisa M Blackwell, Nicole A Turgeon, Joel T Adler
{"title":"Dialysis Social Workers' Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Kidney Transplantation.","authors":"Gloria Chen, Liana Petruzzi, Amanda Ryan, Chandi Mulchand, Lisa M Blackwell, Nicole A Turgeon, Joel T Adler","doi":"10.1177/15269248251343378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Dialysis social workers are integral in the transplant evaluation process; however, research on dialysis social workers' perspectives on access to kidney transplantation is limited. <b>Methods:</b> A mixed methods study examining dialysis social workers' perspectives on transplant barriers and facilitators. Dialysis social workers completed online surveys and participated in virtual, semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-seven dialysis social workers completed surveys, and 15 participated in qualitative interviews. Participants were predominantly female (93%) and White (89%). While the majority (67%) had practiced as a social worker for 6+ years, most had ≤5 years of dialysis experience (52%). The majority described the transplant referral process as somewhat easy (67%) and rated their relationship with transplant programs as either fair or good (78%). Both survey and interview data identified similar patient-level barriers, such as lack of social support and obesity. Interviews further elucidated organizational and system level barriers including tensions between dialysis and transplant centers, transplant center accessibility, and systemic discrimination. Identified facilitators included patient motivation, transplant center communication, and transplant resources. <b>Conclusion:</b> Dialysis social workers provided a unique perspective on barriers and facilitators to kidney transplantation. While barriers to transplant were often considered at the patient level, organizational and system level factors were crucial to understanding transplant access. These findings could inform future efforts between dialysis and transplant centers to improve access to kidney transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248251343378","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dialysis social workers are integral in the transplant evaluation process; however, research on dialysis social workers' perspectives on access to kidney transplantation is limited. Methods: A mixed methods study examining dialysis social workers' perspectives on transplant barriers and facilitators. Dialysis social workers completed online surveys and participated in virtual, semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. Results: Twenty-seven dialysis social workers completed surveys, and 15 participated in qualitative interviews. Participants were predominantly female (93%) and White (89%). While the majority (67%) had practiced as a social worker for 6+ years, most had ≤5 years of dialysis experience (52%). The majority described the transplant referral process as somewhat easy (67%) and rated their relationship with transplant programs as either fair or good (78%). Both survey and interview data identified similar patient-level barriers, such as lack of social support and obesity. Interviews further elucidated organizational and system level barriers including tensions between dialysis and transplant centers, transplant center accessibility, and systemic discrimination. Identified facilitators included patient motivation, transplant center communication, and transplant resources. Conclusion: Dialysis social workers provided a unique perspective on barriers and facilitators to kidney transplantation. While barriers to transplant were often considered at the patient level, organizational and system level factors were crucial to understanding transplant access. These findings could inform future efforts between dialysis and transplant centers to improve access to kidney transplantation.

透析社工对肾移植障碍和促进因素的看法。
透析社工是移植评估过程中不可或缺的一部分;然而,透析社工对肾移植可及性的看法研究有限。方法:采用混合方法研究透析社工对移植障碍和促进因素的看法。透析社工完成了在线调查,并参加了虚拟的半结构化访谈。定性数据被记录、转录,并使用专题分析进行分析。定量数据进行描述性分析。结果:27名透析社工完成问卷调查,15名透析社工参与质性访谈。参与者主要是女性(93%)和白人(89%)。虽然大多数(67%)从事社工工作6年以上,但大多数(52%)有≤5年的透析经验。大多数人认为移植转诊过程比较容易(67%),并认为他们与移植项目的关系公平或良好(78%)。调查和访谈数据都发现了类似的患者层面障碍,如缺乏社会支持和肥胖。访谈进一步阐明了组织和系统层面的障碍,包括透析和移植中心之间的紧张关系、移植中心的可及性和系统性歧视。确定的促进因素包括患者动机、移植中心沟通和移植资源。结论:透析社工对肾移植障碍和促进因素提供了独特的视角。虽然移植障碍通常是在患者层面考虑的,但组织和系统层面的因素对于理解移植准入至关重要。这些发现可以为未来透析和移植中心之间的努力提供信息,以改善肾移植的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Transplantation
Progress in Transplantation SURGERY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信