Differences in Prenatal and Postnatal Phenotypic Evaluations in Patients With Congenital Anomalies and Known Genetic Diagnoses.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1002/pd.6810
Nicole Horton, Leandra Tolusso, Kimberly Widmeyer, Hua He, Daniel T Swarr
{"title":"Differences in Prenatal and Postnatal Phenotypic Evaluations in Patients With Congenital Anomalies and Known Genetic Diagnoses.","authors":"Nicole Horton, Leandra Tolusso, Kimberly Widmeyer, Hua He, Daniel T Swarr","doi":"10.1002/pd.6810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Gaps exist in the understanding of the presentation of genetic conditions across the lifespan, especially the prenatal period. This study describes the limitations of prenatal phenotyping among neonates with genetic conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected prenatal and postnatal phenotypes via retrospective chart review of neonates with genetic diagnoses who previously received fetal ultrasound, MRI, and echocardiogram at the Cincinnati Children's Fetal Care Center (CCFCC) between July 2018 and October 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 83 neonates with genetic diagnoses, the number of phenotypic findings significantly increased after postnatal evaluation (mean: 10.01) compared with what was identified during prenatal evaluation (mean: 4.65; p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in the number of anomalies noted postnatally in most body systems, including the musculoskeletal, nervous, and respiratory systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are significant increases in phenotypic findings prenatally and after birth. Fetuses with anomalies should be evaluated multiple times, particularly when a genetic etiology is suspected, to aid in phenotype-driven genetic testing. Identifying diagnoses during the prenatal period allows time for families to adapt perinatal medical management decisions or post-birth plans, such as adoption. Awareness of phenotypes that are difficult to evaluate may improve variant curation by placing less value in the absence of findings that may be characteristic of a disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6810","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Gaps exist in the understanding of the presentation of genetic conditions across the lifespan, especially the prenatal period. This study describes the limitations of prenatal phenotyping among neonates with genetic conditions.

Methods: We collected prenatal and postnatal phenotypes via retrospective chart review of neonates with genetic diagnoses who previously received fetal ultrasound, MRI, and echocardiogram at the Cincinnati Children's Fetal Care Center (CCFCC) between July 2018 and October 2022.

Results: For 83 neonates with genetic diagnoses, the number of phenotypic findings significantly increased after postnatal evaluation (mean: 10.01) compared with what was identified during prenatal evaluation (mean: 4.65; p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in the number of anomalies noted postnatally in most body systems, including the musculoskeletal, nervous, and respiratory systems.

Conclusions: There are significant increases in phenotypic findings prenatally and after birth. Fetuses with anomalies should be evaluated multiple times, particularly when a genetic etiology is suspected, to aid in phenotype-driven genetic testing. Identifying diagnoses during the prenatal period allows time for families to adapt perinatal medical management decisions or post-birth plans, such as adoption. Awareness of phenotypes that are difficult to evaluate may improve variant curation by placing less value in the absence of findings that may be characteristic of a disorder.

先天性异常患者产前和产后表型评估的差异和已知的遗传诊断。
目的:对遗传条件在整个生命周期,特别是产前期的表现的理解存在差距。本研究描述了产前表型在新生儿遗传条件的局限性。方法:我们通过回顾性图表回顾2018年7月至2022年10月期间在辛辛那提儿童胎儿护理中心(CCFCC)接受胎儿超声、MRI和超声心动图检查的遗传诊断新生儿的产前和产后表型。结果:对于83例遗传诊断的新生儿,与产前评估(平均:4.65;p结论:在产前和出生后的表型发现显著增加。异常胎儿应多次评估,特别是当怀疑遗传病因时,以帮助进行表型驱动的基因检测。在产前确定诊断,使家庭有时间调整围产期医疗管理决定或产后计划,如收养。对难以评估的表型的认识可以通过减少对缺乏可能是疾病特征的发现的重视来改善变异管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信