Efficacy and Safety of Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block in the Management of Neuropathic Cough: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lung Pub Date : 2025-05-22 DOI:10.1007/s00408-025-00819-1
Andrea Campagnolo, Vinícius Nickel, Michael S Benninger
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block in the Management of Neuropathic Cough: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Andrea Campagnolo, Vinícius Nickel, Michael S Benninger","doi":"10.1007/s00408-025-00819-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To systematically review the efficacy and safety, both short and long-term, of superior laryngeal nerve block (SLNB) for managing neuropathic cough.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using the keywords \"Superior laryngeal nerve block,\" \"Neurogenic Cough,\" \"Neuropathic Cough,\" and \"Refractory Chronic Cough.\" The primary outcome was cough-specific quality of life (QoL), evaluated with validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), Cough Severity Index (CSI), and Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ). Additional data included SLNB technique, cough duration, use of neuromodulators and Behavioral Cough Suppression Therapy (BCST), injection frequency, vocal fold dysfunction (VFD), and adverse events. Quality assessments used the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies comprising 625 patients were included. The average cough duration prior to intervention was 78 months, with a mean follow-up of 5.01 months. Patients received an average of 2.5 injections. Short-term outcomes showed consistent improvements in PROMs and cough perception. Long-term outcomes (beyond three months) were reported in four studies, with minimal variations but no statistical comparisons to baseline scores. Significant heterogeneity was noted across studies, including differences in assessment protocols and adjunctive therapies. No significant adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLNB is a safe and effective treatment for refractory chronic cough, either alone or with systemic medications. However, the variability among studies highlights the need for standardized protocols and further research with long-term follow-up to confirm its efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18163,"journal":{"name":"Lung","volume":"203 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-025-00819-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically review the efficacy and safety, both short and long-term, of superior laryngeal nerve block (SLNB) for managing neuropathic cough.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using the keywords "Superior laryngeal nerve block," "Neurogenic Cough," "Neuropathic Cough," and "Refractory Chronic Cough." The primary outcome was cough-specific quality of life (QoL), evaluated with validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), Cough Severity Index (CSI), and Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ). Additional data included SLNB technique, cough duration, use of neuromodulators and Behavioral Cough Suppression Therapy (BCST), injection frequency, vocal fold dysfunction (VFD), and adverse events. Quality assessments used the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.

Results: Ten studies comprising 625 patients were included. The average cough duration prior to intervention was 78 months, with a mean follow-up of 5.01 months. Patients received an average of 2.5 injections. Short-term outcomes showed consistent improvements in PROMs and cough perception. Long-term outcomes (beyond three months) were reported in four studies, with minimal variations but no statistical comparisons to baseline scores. Significant heterogeneity was noted across studies, including differences in assessment protocols and adjunctive therapies. No significant adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: SLNB is a safe and effective treatment for refractory chronic cough, either alone or with systemic medications. However, the variability among studies highlights the need for standardized protocols and further research with long-term follow-up to confirm its efficacy.

喉上神经阻滞治疗神经性咳嗽的疗效和安全性:系统综述。
目的:系统评价喉上神经阻滞(SLNB)治疗神经性咳嗽的短期和长期疗效和安全性。方法:以“喉上神经阻滞”、“神经性咳嗽”、“神经性咳嗽”、“难治性慢性咳嗽”等关键词进行文献检索。主要结局是咳嗽特异性生活质量(QoL),通过有效的患者报告结果测量(PROMs)进行评估,如莱斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ)、咳嗽严重程度指数(CSI)和赫尔气道反流问卷(HARQ)。其他数据包括SLNB技术、咳嗽持续时间、神经调节剂和行为止咳疗法(BCST)的使用、注射频率、声带功能障碍(VFD)和不良事件。质量评估采用非随机研究方法学指数(未成年人)标准。结果:纳入10项研究,625例患者。干预前平均咳嗽持续时间为78个月,平均随访5.01个月。患者平均接受2.5次注射。短期结果显示PROMs和咳嗽感知持续改善。四项研究报告了长期结果(超过三个月),差异很小,但与基线评分没有统计学比较。研究中发现了显著的异质性,包括评估方案和辅助治疗的差异。无明显不良事件报道。结论:SLNB是一种安全有效的治疗难治性慢性咳嗽的方法,无论是单独使用还是与全身药物联合使用。然而,研究之间的差异突出了标准化方案和进一步的长期随访研究以确认其有效性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lung
Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lung publishes original articles, reviews and editorials on all aspects of the healthy and diseased lungs, of the airways, and of breathing. Epidemiological, clinical, pathophysiological, biochemical, and pharmacological studies fall within the scope of the journal. Case reports, short communications and technical notes can be accepted if they are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信