Post-COVID-19 pandemic lived experiences of nurses about evidence-based care: A phenomenological study.

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1843_23
Mohammad Malekzadeh, Mohammadsaeed Mirzaee, Leyla Homayuni, Elham Mirshah, Leila Bozorgin, Tahereh Gilvari, Soheyla Zabolipoor, Leila Gholami
{"title":"Post-COVID-19 pandemic lived experiences of nurses about evidence-based care: A phenomenological study.","authors":"Mohammad Malekzadeh, Mohammadsaeed Mirzaee, Leyla Homayuni, Elham Mirshah, Leila Bozorgin, Tahereh Gilvari, Soheyla Zabolipoor, Leila Gholami","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1843_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing care was very complicated and confusing due to the special conditions of this time period and due to the lack of objective evidence to provide evidence-based nursing care. The purpose of this study was to post-COVID-19 investigate nurses' lived experiences of evidence-based care in Iran.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This research was conducted through a qualitative approach using Husserli's descriptive phenomenological method. The participants included nurses working in the wards of COVID-19. Sampling in this study was conducted using a targeted method. People were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. A code of ethics and necessary permits were received. Data collection was performed using unstructured interviews. The time of the interviews varied between 30 and 60 minutes. All interviews were recorded and then transcribed. The method proposed by Colaizzi was used for data analysis. Lincoln and Guba's criteria were used for the accuracy and robustness of the data. Also, MAXQDA software was used for data management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main themes and sub-themes in this study include barriers (lack of mastery in searching for evidence, lack of prioritization of evidence-based care, lack of availability of sufficient evidence, and the complexity of the condition of the COVID-19 disease) and facilitators (need for new evidence, a different care context, the need for extensive training, and the need to improve the nursing care).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this research showed that based on the experiences of nurses, there are still barriers to patient care after the COVID-19 pandemic, and in addition, there are facilitators that are effective in the development of evidence-based care. We recommend that based on examining barriers and facilitators in this study, necessary planning should be performed to conduct applied research, develop clinical regulations, and better manage patients in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1843_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing care was very complicated and confusing due to the special conditions of this time period and due to the lack of objective evidence to provide evidence-based nursing care. The purpose of this study was to post-COVID-19 investigate nurses' lived experiences of evidence-based care in Iran.

Materials and methods: This research was conducted through a qualitative approach using Husserli's descriptive phenomenological method. The participants included nurses working in the wards of COVID-19. Sampling in this study was conducted using a targeted method. People were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. A code of ethics and necessary permits were received. Data collection was performed using unstructured interviews. The time of the interviews varied between 30 and 60 minutes. All interviews were recorded and then transcribed. The method proposed by Colaizzi was used for data analysis. Lincoln and Guba's criteria were used for the accuracy and robustness of the data. Also, MAXQDA software was used for data management.

Results: The main themes and sub-themes in this study include barriers (lack of mastery in searching for evidence, lack of prioritization of evidence-based care, lack of availability of sufficient evidence, and the complexity of the condition of the COVID-19 disease) and facilitators (need for new evidence, a different care context, the need for extensive training, and the need to improve the nursing care).

Conclusion: The findings of this research showed that based on the experiences of nurses, there are still barriers to patient care after the COVID-19 pandemic, and in addition, there are facilitators that are effective in the development of evidence-based care. We recommend that based on examining barriers and facilitators in this study, necessary planning should be performed to conduct applied research, develop clinical regulations, and better manage patients in the future.

covid -19大流行后护士循证护理的生活经验:现象学研究
背景:在新冠肺炎大流行期间,由于这一时期的特殊情况以及缺乏客观证据来提供循证护理,护理工作非常复杂和混乱。本研究的目的是调查伊朗covid -19后护士的循证护理生活经历。材料与方法:本研究采用胡塞利描述现象学方法进行定性研究。参与者包括在COVID-19病房工作的护士。本研究采用有针对性的抽样方法。根据纳入和排除标准选择受试者。收到了一份道德守则和必要的许可证。数据收集采用非结构化访谈。采访时间从30分钟到60分钟不等。所有的采访都被记录下来,然后转录。采用Colaizzi提出的方法进行数据分析。Lincoln和Guba的标准用于数据的准确性和稳健性。采用MAXQDA软件进行数据管理。结果:本研究的主题和副主题包括障碍(缺乏对证据的掌握,缺乏循证护理的优先级,缺乏足够证据的可获得性,以及COVID-19疾病病情的复杂性)和促进因素(需要新的证据,不同的护理环境,需要广泛的培训,需要改善护理)。结论:本研究结果表明,根据护士的经验,COVID-19大流行后患者护理仍然存在障碍,此外,存在有效发展循证护理的促进因素。我们建议在考察本研究障碍和促进因素的基础上,制定必要的规划,开展应用研究,制定临床法规,更好地管理患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信