Assessment of entrustable professional activities among master of public health students: A study protocol.

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1544_24
Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava, Shubhada Gade, Alka Rawekar
{"title":"Assessment of entrustable professional activities among master of public health students: A study protocol.","authors":"Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava, Shubhada Gade, Alka Rawekar","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1544_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the current era, the field of public health carries immense importance, especially with regard to addressing complex global challenges. The present study has been planned with the objectives of developing and validating appropriate assessment tools for public health-related Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), assessing the utility of the validated tools in the assessment of Master of Public Health (MPH) students, and obtaining feedback from MPH students and faculty regarding the assessment process.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-center, prospective, interventional, pilot study will be conducted in the Department of Community Medicine, Datta Meghe Medical College, with the study participants being MPH students over a period of 2 years. Faculty members and MPH students will be sensitized about different aspects of the study, and three EPAs (depending on their feasibility) and three corresponding appropriate assessment tools will be selected for the pilot study. Subsequently, a checklist (for Objective Structured Clinical Examination) and rubrics of milestones (For Direct Observation of Procedural Skills and Mini-Peer Assessment Tool) will be developed for the corresponding EPAs, and these assessment tools will be validated using the Delphi Method with the help of four subject experts. After each assessment, constructive feedback will be given by the assessor, students will be asked to reflect upon their performance, identify their areas of weakness, and develop shared learning goals. Finally, feedback from both faculty members and MPH students will be obtained about the overall assessment process.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The proposed study aims to assess EPAs that are essential for public health practice, ensuring that MPH students can independently perform real-world tasks. This is expected to bridge the existing educational gaps, provide insights into the shortcomings of the existing curriculum, and help educators bring about alignment between global trends and the curriculum of the MPH program.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1544_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the current era, the field of public health carries immense importance, especially with regard to addressing complex global challenges. The present study has been planned with the objectives of developing and validating appropriate assessment tools for public health-related Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), assessing the utility of the validated tools in the assessment of Master of Public Health (MPH) students, and obtaining feedback from MPH students and faculty regarding the assessment process.

Materials and methods: A single-center, prospective, interventional, pilot study will be conducted in the Department of Community Medicine, Datta Meghe Medical College, with the study participants being MPH students over a period of 2 years. Faculty members and MPH students will be sensitized about different aspects of the study, and three EPAs (depending on their feasibility) and three corresponding appropriate assessment tools will be selected for the pilot study. Subsequently, a checklist (for Objective Structured Clinical Examination) and rubrics of milestones (For Direct Observation of Procedural Skills and Mini-Peer Assessment Tool) will be developed for the corresponding EPAs, and these assessment tools will be validated using the Delphi Method with the help of four subject experts. After each assessment, constructive feedback will be given by the assessor, students will be asked to reflect upon their performance, identify their areas of weakness, and develop shared learning goals. Finally, feedback from both faculty members and MPH students will be obtained about the overall assessment process.

Discussion: The proposed study aims to assess EPAs that are essential for public health practice, ensuring that MPH students can independently perform real-world tasks. This is expected to bridge the existing educational gaps, provide insights into the shortcomings of the existing curriculum, and help educators bring about alignment between global trends and the curriculum of the MPH program.

公共卫生硕士学生可信赖的专业活动评估:研究方案。
背景:在当前时代,公共卫生领域具有极其重要的意义,特别是在应对复杂的全球挑战方面。本研究旨在开发并验证公共健康相关专业活动(EPAs)的评估工具,评估这些评估工具在公共卫生硕士(MPH)学生评估中的效用,并获得MPH学生和教师对评估过程的反馈。材料和方法:一项单中心、前瞻性、干预性的试点研究将在达塔梅赫医学院社区医学系进行,研究参与者为两年的公共卫生硕士学生。学院的教职员工和公共卫生硕士学生将了解研究的不同方面,并将选择三个环境影响评估(取决于其可行性)和三个相应的适当评估工具进行试点研究。随后,将为相应的EPAs制定清单(用于客观结构化临床检查)和里程碑规则(用于程序技能直接观察和小型同行评估工具),并在四位学科专家的帮助下使用德尔菲法对这些评估工具进行验证。每次评估后,评估员将给出建设性的反馈,学生将被要求反思他们的表现,确定他们的弱点,并制定共同的学习目标。最后,将获得教师和公共卫生硕士学生对整体评估过程的反馈。讨论:拟议的研究旨在评估公共卫生实践中必不可少的epa,确保公共卫生硕士学生能够独立完成现实世界的任务。预计这将弥合现有的教育差距,提供对现有课程缺点的见解,并帮助教育工作者将全球趋势与公共卫生硕士项目的课程结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信