Oncologist perceptions of "cure" and long-term management in advanced ovarian cancer in the United States: results from a cross-sectional survey.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Robert L Coleman, Zulikhat Segunmaru, Elizabeth A Szamreta, Kathryn Krupsky, Kathleen Beusterien, M Janelle Cambron-Mellott, Michael F Barry, Nicole Kashine, Emily Mulvihill, Daniel Simmons
{"title":"Oncologist perceptions of \"cure\" and long-term management in advanced ovarian cancer in the United States: results from a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Robert L Coleman, Zulikhat Segunmaru, Elizabeth A Szamreta, Kathryn Krupsky, Kathleen Beusterien, M Janelle Cambron-Mellott, Michael F Barry, Nicole Kashine, Emily Mulvihill, Daniel Simmons","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Treatment advancements have improved survival outcomes for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. In advanced ovarian cancer, some physicians believe discussing \"cure\" as a potential treatment goal may be premature. In contrast, others note that the durable responses observed among some patients may suggest that long-term remission or \"cure\" are legitimate outcomes to strive for. Despite this, the term 'cure' has no accepted definition in this setting, and whether physicians are willing to use this language is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, internet-based survey was conducted to evaluate United States oncologists' attitudes and beliefs related to \"cure\" in the context of treating patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. The survey included questions on attitudes and beliefs toward patient prognosis with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, oncologists' perceptions of clinical outcomes, oncologist characteristics, and clinical practice details.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 150 oncologists, when addressing the topic of disease prognosis or treatment goals in patients newly diagnosed with stage III-IV ovarian cancer, the terms endorsed by more than half of oncologists were \"achieve long-term remission\" and \"achieve long-term response.\" Terms including \"cure\" or \"curable\" were endorsed by less than 35% of oncologists. Among several patient characteristics evaluated, no evidence of disease for 5 to 10 years was most indicative of cure. In the context of primary disease, the proportion of oncologists who would tell a patient with advanced ovarian cancer they were cured, even if they believe it to be true, decreased with the stage (II = 73.8%; III = 60.8%; IV = 50.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study found that while oncologists may believe a cure is possible across early stages of ovarian cancer, many remain hesitant to discuss the potential of \"cure\" with patients, particularly those with stage IV disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 7","pages":"101919"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Treatment advancements have improved survival outcomes for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. In advanced ovarian cancer, some physicians believe discussing "cure" as a potential treatment goal may be premature. In contrast, others note that the durable responses observed among some patients may suggest that long-term remission or "cure" are legitimate outcomes to strive for. Despite this, the term 'cure' has no accepted definition in this setting, and whether physicians are willing to use this language is unknown.

Methods: A cross-sectional, internet-based survey was conducted to evaluate United States oncologists' attitudes and beliefs related to "cure" in the context of treating patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. The survey included questions on attitudes and beliefs toward patient prognosis with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, oncologists' perceptions of clinical outcomes, oncologist characteristics, and clinical practice details.

Results: Among 150 oncologists, when addressing the topic of disease prognosis or treatment goals in patients newly diagnosed with stage III-IV ovarian cancer, the terms endorsed by more than half of oncologists were "achieve long-term remission" and "achieve long-term response." Terms including "cure" or "curable" were endorsed by less than 35% of oncologists. Among several patient characteristics evaluated, no evidence of disease for 5 to 10 years was most indicative of cure. In the context of primary disease, the proportion of oncologists who would tell a patient with advanced ovarian cancer they were cured, even if they believe it to be true, decreased with the stage (II = 73.8%; III = 60.8%; IV = 50.5%).

Conclusions: The current study found that while oncologists may believe a cure is possible across early stages of ovarian cancer, many remain hesitant to discuss the potential of "cure" with patients, particularly those with stage IV disease.

肿瘤学家对美国晚期卵巢癌“治愈”和长期管理的看法:一项横断面调查的结果。
目的:治疗进展改善了晚期卵巢癌患者的生存结果。对于晚期卵巢癌,一些医生认为讨论“治愈”作为潜在的治疗目标可能为时过早。相反,其他人注意到,在一些患者中观察到的持久反应可能表明,长期缓解或“治愈”是值得争取的合理结果。尽管如此,在这种情况下,“治愈”一词没有公认的定义,医生是否愿意使用这个词也不得而知。方法:通过一项基于互联网的横断面调查,评估美国肿瘤学家在治疗新诊断的晚期卵巢癌患者时对“治愈”的态度和信念。调查的问题包括对新诊断晚期卵巢癌患者预后的态度和信念、肿瘤学家对临床结果的看法、肿瘤学家的特点和临床实践细节。结果:在150名肿瘤学家中,当讨论新诊断为III-IV期卵巢癌患者的疾病预后或治疗目标时,超过一半的肿瘤学家认可的术语是“实现长期缓解”和“实现长期缓解”。只有不到35%的肿瘤学家认可“治愈”或“可治愈”等术语。在评估的几项患者特征中,5至10年没有疾病证据最能说明治愈。在原发疾病的情况下,肿瘤学家告诉晚期卵巢癌患者他们已经治愈的比例,即使他们相信这是真的,随着分期的增加而减少(II = 73.8%;Iii = 60.8%;Iv = 50.5%)。结论:目前的研究发现,虽然肿瘤学家可能相信治愈早期卵巢癌是可能的,但许多人仍然犹豫不决,不愿与患者讨论“治愈”的可能性,尤其是那些处于第四阶段的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信