Improving Recovery and Outcomes Every Day After the ICU (IMPROVE): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Sikandar H Khan, Anthony J Perkins, Frederick W Unverzagt, Sophia Wang, Lyndsi R Moser, Salwa Moiz, Samreen Jawaid, Dexter Corlett, Daniel O Clark, Malaz A Boustani, Sujuan Gao, Babar A Khan
{"title":"Improving Recovery and Outcomes Every Day After the ICU (IMPROVE): A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Sikandar H Khan, Anthony J Perkins, Frederick W Unverzagt, Sophia Wang, Lyndsi R Moser, Salwa Moiz, Samreen Jawaid, Dexter Corlett, Daniel O Clark, Malaz A Boustani, Sujuan Gao, Babar A Khan","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effects of a 12-week, web-based, combined cognitive and physical training intervention on cognitive performance among ICU delirium survivors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, four-arm randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four sites (academic, county, community ICUs).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>ICU adults 50 years old or older with at least one instance of ICU delirium or subsyndromal delirium.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized to one of four groups: physical exercise-cognitive training (PE-CT), physical exercise-cognitive control (PE-CC), stretching control-cognitive training (SC-CT), or stretching control-cognitive control (SC-CC).</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was cognitive function at 3 and 6 months after start of intervention, as assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). One hundred fifty-three patients were randomized to either: PE-CT, n = 41; PE-CC, n = 41; SC-CT, n = 36; or SC-CC, n = 35. There was a significant difference on changes in RBANS z scores among the four arms (interaction term p = 0.012). The mean RBANS z scores ranged from -2.66 to +1.43 (change in RBANS z score of ± 0.5-0.6 may be clinically significant). The SC-CT group had statistically significant worsening in cognitive scores compared with the SC-CC group at 3 (mean estimated difference in change from baseline, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.53 to -0.02; p = 0.035) and 6 months (mean estimated difference in change from baseline, -0.29; 95% CI, -0.53 to -0.04; p = 0.021). Compared with the SC-CC group, the PE-CC group had statistically significant worsening in cognitive scores at 6 month (mean estimated difference in change from baseline, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.49 to -0.02; p = 0.035). There were no significant differences between groups in physical or mental quality of life, depression, or anxiety outcomes at any of the timepoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Improving Recovery and Outcomes Every Day After the ICU (IMPROVE) trial did not result in improved cognitive, physical, mental health, or quality of life measures at 3 or 6 months. We found a drop in cognitive performance among patients receiving cognitive training from baseline to 3 months postintervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006698","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the effects of a 12-week, web-based, combined cognitive and physical training intervention on cognitive performance among ICU delirium survivors.

Design: Prospective, four-arm randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Four sites (academic, county, community ICUs).

Patients: ICU adults 50 years old or older with at least one instance of ICU delirium or subsyndromal delirium.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to one of four groups: physical exercise-cognitive training (PE-CT), physical exercise-cognitive control (PE-CC), stretching control-cognitive training (SC-CT), or stretching control-cognitive control (SC-CC).

Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was cognitive function at 3 and 6 months after start of intervention, as assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). One hundred fifty-three patients were randomized to either: PE-CT, n = 41; PE-CC, n = 41; SC-CT, n = 36; or SC-CC, n = 35. There was a significant difference on changes in RBANS z scores among the four arms (interaction term p = 0.012). The mean RBANS z scores ranged from -2.66 to +1.43 (change in RBANS z score of ± 0.5-0.6 may be clinically significant). The SC-CT group had statistically significant worsening in cognitive scores compared with the SC-CC group at 3 (mean estimated difference in change from baseline, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.53 to -0.02; p = 0.035) and 6 months (mean estimated difference in change from baseline, -0.29; 95% CI, -0.53 to -0.04; p = 0.021). Compared with the SC-CC group, the PE-CC group had statistically significant worsening in cognitive scores at 6 month (mean estimated difference in change from baseline, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.49 to -0.02; p = 0.035). There were no significant differences between groups in physical or mental quality of life, depression, or anxiety outcomes at any of the timepoints.

Conclusions: The Improving Recovery and Outcomes Every Day After the ICU (IMPROVE) trial did not result in improved cognitive, physical, mental health, or quality of life measures at 3 or 6 months. We found a drop in cognitive performance among patients receiving cognitive training from baseline to 3 months postintervention.

改善ICU后每天的康复和预后(改善):一项随机对照试验。
目的:探讨为期12周、基于网络的认知和体能训练联合干预对ICU谵妄幸存者认知表现的影响。设计:前瞻性、四组随机对照试验。设置:四个站点(学术,县,社区icu)。患者:ICU成人50岁或以上,至少有一例ICU谵妄或亚综合征性谵妄。干预措施:患者被随机分为四组:体育锻炼-认知训练(PE-CT)、体育锻炼-认知控制(PE-CC)、拉伸控制-认知训练(SC-CT)或拉伸控制-认知控制(SC-CC)。测量和主要结果:干预开始后3个月和6个月的主要结果是认知功能,通过可重复电池评估神经心理状态(rban)进行评估。153例患者随机分为两组:PE-CT组,n = 41;PE-CC, n = 41;SC-CT, n = 36;或SC-CC, n = 35。四组RBANS z评分的变化差异有统计学意义(相互作用项p = 0.012)。平均RBANS z评分范围为-2.66至+1.43 (RBANS z评分±0.5-0.6的变化可能具有临床意义)。与SC-CC组相比,SC-CT组在认知评分上的恶化具有统计学意义,评分为3(与基线相比,平均估计变化差值为-0.28;95% CI, -0.53 ~ -0.02;P = 0.035)和6个月(与基线相比的平均估计变化差异,-0.29;95% CI, -0.53 ~ -0.04;P = 0.021)。与SC-CC组相比,PE-CC组在6个月时的认知评分有统计学意义的恶化(与基线相比的平均估计变化差异,-0.26;95% CI, -0.49 ~ -0.02;P = 0.035)。在任何时间点,两组之间在身体或精神生活质量、抑郁或焦虑结果方面没有显著差异。结论:改善康复和每天在ICU后的预后(IMPROVE)试验在3个月或6个月时并未导致认知、身体、心理健康或生活质量的改善。我们发现,从基线到干预后3个月,接受认知训练的患者的认知表现有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信