Cardiovascular risk profile in subjects with diabetes: Is SCORE2-Diabetes reliable?

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sabrina Scilletta, Maurizio Di Marco, Nicoletta Miano, Stefania Capuccio, Marco Musmeci, Giosiana Bosco, Francesco Di Giacomo Barbagallo, Marina Martedì, Francesca La Rocca, Alessio Vitale, Roberto Scicali, Salvatore Piro, Antonino Di Pino
{"title":"Cardiovascular risk profile in subjects with diabetes: Is SCORE2-Diabetes reliable?","authors":"Sabrina Scilletta, Maurizio Di Marco, Nicoletta Miano, Stefania Capuccio, Marco Musmeci, Giosiana Bosco, Francesco Di Giacomo Barbagallo, Marina Martedì, Francesca La Rocca, Alessio Vitale, Roberto Scicali, Salvatore Piro, Antonino Di Pino","doi":"10.1186/s12933-025-02769-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People living with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at a two- to four-fold higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with those without T2D, making early assessment of their CV risk essential. European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has developed a new model to estimate 10-year CV risk in people with T2D aged ≥ 40 years: SCORE2-Diabetes. Despite its advantages, several aspects remain to be clarified. This study evaluated the association between CV risk stratified by SCORE2-Diabetes and early CV damage assessed through arterial stiffness, intima-media thickness (IMT), and carotid atherosclerosis. Additionally, it examined the agreement between risk stratification by SCORE2 and SCORE2-Diabetes and their concordance with vascular damage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pulse wave velocity (PWV), IMT, and carotid atherosclerosis were assessed in 179 individuals with T2D aged 40-69 years, categorized into SCORE2-Diabetes risk groups: Low (n = 20), Moderate (n = 29), High (n = 44), and very high (n = 37). Patients with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or severe target organ damage (TOD) constituted another group (ASCVD/TOD, n = 49).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PWV was significantly increased from Low to very high and ASCVD/TOD groups (7.2 ± 1.1, 8.7 ± 1.9, 9.8 ± 2.3, 12.8 ± 5.1 and 11.5 ± 3.8 m/s, respectively). Similarly, IMT showed a stepwise increase with risk class (0.68 ± 0.11, 0.78 ± 0.13, 0.83 ± 0.12, 0.86 ± 0.19 and 0.87 ± 0.15 mm, respectively). Patients in very high or ASCVD/TOD group showed a higher prevalence of carotid atherosclerosis than other groups (0%, 17.24%, 11.40%, 37.83% and 40.81%, respectively). No significant differences were found between the very high and ASCVD/TOD groups in any parameter. The correlation between PWV values and increasing CV risk was stronger for SCORE2-Diabetes than for SCORE2. ROC curve analysis showed SCORE2-Diabetes had superior predictive performance for carotid atherosclerosis and high PWV compared to SCORE2 (p = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher PWV, IMT, and carotid atherosclerosis prevalence were associated with increasing CV risk stratified by SCORE2-Diabetes, with no significant differences between the very high and ASCVD/TOD groups. SCORE2-Diabetes demonstrated a better identification of preclinical vascular damage compared to SCORE2, supporting its use as a reliable tool for identifying vascular damage in T2D patients without ASCVD or TOD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9374,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","volume":"24 1","pages":"222"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-025-02769-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People living with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at a two- to four-fold higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with those without T2D, making early assessment of their CV risk essential. European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has developed a new model to estimate 10-year CV risk in people with T2D aged ≥ 40 years: SCORE2-Diabetes. Despite its advantages, several aspects remain to be clarified. This study evaluated the association between CV risk stratified by SCORE2-Diabetes and early CV damage assessed through arterial stiffness, intima-media thickness (IMT), and carotid atherosclerosis. Additionally, it examined the agreement between risk stratification by SCORE2 and SCORE2-Diabetes and their concordance with vascular damage.

Methods: Pulse wave velocity (PWV), IMT, and carotid atherosclerosis were assessed in 179 individuals with T2D aged 40-69 years, categorized into SCORE2-Diabetes risk groups: Low (n = 20), Moderate (n = 29), High (n = 44), and very high (n = 37). Patients with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or severe target organ damage (TOD) constituted another group (ASCVD/TOD, n = 49).

Results: PWV was significantly increased from Low to very high and ASCVD/TOD groups (7.2 ± 1.1, 8.7 ± 1.9, 9.8 ± 2.3, 12.8 ± 5.1 and 11.5 ± 3.8 m/s, respectively). Similarly, IMT showed a stepwise increase with risk class (0.68 ± 0.11, 0.78 ± 0.13, 0.83 ± 0.12, 0.86 ± 0.19 and 0.87 ± 0.15 mm, respectively). Patients in very high or ASCVD/TOD group showed a higher prevalence of carotid atherosclerosis than other groups (0%, 17.24%, 11.40%, 37.83% and 40.81%, respectively). No significant differences were found between the very high and ASCVD/TOD groups in any parameter. The correlation between PWV values and increasing CV risk was stronger for SCORE2-Diabetes than for SCORE2. ROC curve analysis showed SCORE2-Diabetes had superior predictive performance for carotid atherosclerosis and high PWV compared to SCORE2 (p = 0.048).

Conclusions: Higher PWV, IMT, and carotid atherosclerosis prevalence were associated with increasing CV risk stratified by SCORE2-Diabetes, with no significant differences between the very high and ASCVD/TOD groups. SCORE2-Diabetes demonstrated a better identification of preclinical vascular damage compared to SCORE2, supporting its use as a reliable tool for identifying vascular damage in T2D patients without ASCVD or TOD.

糖尿病患者心血管风险概况:SCORE2-Diabetes可靠吗?
背景:2型糖尿病(T2D)患者发生心血管疾病(CVD)的风险是无T2D患者的2 - 4倍,因此早期评估其CV风险至关重要。欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)开发了一种新的模型来评估≥40岁T2D患者的10年CV风险:SCORE2-Diabetes。尽管它有优点,但仍有几个方面有待澄清。本研究通过动脉僵硬度、内膜-中膜厚度(IMT)和颈动脉粥样硬化来评估由score2 -糖尿病分层的心血管风险与早期心血管损害之间的关系。此外,它还检查了SCORE2和SCORE2- diabetes的风险分层之间的一致性及其与血管损伤的一致性。方法:对179例40-69岁T2D患者的脉搏波速度(PWV)、IMT和颈动脉粥样硬化进行评估,这些患者被分为低(n = 20)、中(n = 29)、高(n = 44)和非常高(n = 37)的score2 -糖尿病风险组。另一组为有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)或严重靶器官损害(TOD)病史的患者(ASCVD/TOD, n = 49)。结果:低至极高和ASCVD/TOD组PWV显著升高(分别为7.2±1.1、8.7±1.9、9.8±2.3、12.8±5.1和11.5±3.8 m/s)。IMT随危险等级的增加而逐渐增加(分别为0.68±0.11、0.78±0.13、0.83±0.12、0.86±0.19、0.87±0.15 mm)。非常高或ASCVD/TOD组颈动脉粥样硬化患病率高于其他组(分别为0%、17.24%、11.40%、37.83%和40.81%)。ASCVD/TOD非常高组和ASCVD/TOD组在任何参数上均无显著差异。与SCORE2糖尿病患者相比,SCORE2糖尿病患者PWV值与CV风险增加的相关性更强。ROC曲线分析显示,SCORE2- diabetes对颈动脉粥样硬化和高PWV的预测性能优于SCORE2 (p = 0.048)。结论:较高的PWV、IMT和颈动脉粥样硬化患病率与score2 -糖尿病分层的CV风险增加相关,非常高和ASCVD/TOD组之间无显著差异。与SCORE2相比,SCORE2- diabetes能够更好地识别临床前血管损伤,支持其作为无ASCVD或TOD的T2D患者血管损伤的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Cardiovascular Diabetology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Diabetology is a journal that welcomes manuscripts exploring various aspects of the relationship between diabetes, cardiovascular health, and the metabolic syndrome. We invite submissions related to clinical studies, genetic investigations, experimental research, pharmacological studies, epidemiological analyses, and molecular biology research in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信