Evaluate feeding effects of pelletized total mixed ration on Hu sheep: growth, rumen fermentation, and rumen bacterial community.

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Chuankai Zhang, Xiaohui Kong, Peijun Hou, Tong Fu, Tengyun Gao, Huaijun Zheng, Wenqing Li, Liyang Zhang
{"title":"Evaluate feeding effects of pelletized total mixed ration on Hu sheep: growth, rumen fermentation, and rumen bacterial community.","authors":"Chuankai Zhang, Xiaohui Kong, Peijun Hou, Tong Fu, Tengyun Gao, Huaijun Zheng, Wenqing Li, Liyang Zhang","doi":"10.5713/ab.24.0852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to compare the growth performance, rumen fermentation and rumen bacterial community of fattening Hu sheep fed either total mixed ration (TMR) or pelleted total mixed ration (PTMR), and to assess the feeding efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a 58-day feeding experiment, forty-eight Hu sheep were randomly assigned to two groups (TMR and PTMR), with six pens per group and four sheep per pen. Body weight and feed intake were measured throughout the experiment to assess growth performance. On the final day of the experiment, rumen fluid was collected from sheep using a rumen fluid collector two hours post-feeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sheep in the PTMR group exhibited significantly higher body weight (p<0.05), average daily gain (p<0.01), and dry matter intake (p<0.05) compared to those in the TMR group. No statistically significant differences were observed in rumen fermentation parameters between the TMR and PTMR groups. However, analysis of rumen bacteria revealed that the Sob, Ace, Bootstrap, Shannon, and Chao indices were significantly lower in the PTMR group compared to TMR group (p<0.05). Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were the predominant bacteria in all groups, with the abundance of Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001 was significantly lower in the PTMR group. The relative abundance of Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, NK4A214_group, and Streptococcus, was significantly higher in the TMR group than in the PTMR group (p<0.05). Bacterial function prediction showed downregulation of energy production and conversion pathway in the PTMR group (p<0.05). Correlation analysis indicated that norank_f_Bacteroidales_RF16 positively correlated with butyric acid (p<0.05), while Anaerovibrio negatively correlated with acetic, propionic acids, butyric acid, and total volatile fatty acids (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, this study demonstrated that PTMR, while reducing rumen bacterial abundance in Hu sheep, significantly increased their average daily gain and dry matter intake, indicating its potential for practical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":7825,"journal":{"name":"Animal Bioscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Bioscience","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0852","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to compare the growth performance, rumen fermentation and rumen bacterial community of fattening Hu sheep fed either total mixed ration (TMR) or pelleted total mixed ration (PTMR), and to assess the feeding efficiency.

Methods: In a 58-day feeding experiment, forty-eight Hu sheep were randomly assigned to two groups (TMR and PTMR), with six pens per group and four sheep per pen. Body weight and feed intake were measured throughout the experiment to assess growth performance. On the final day of the experiment, rumen fluid was collected from sheep using a rumen fluid collector two hours post-feeding.

Results: The sheep in the PTMR group exhibited significantly higher body weight (p<0.05), average daily gain (p<0.01), and dry matter intake (p<0.05) compared to those in the TMR group. No statistically significant differences were observed in rumen fermentation parameters between the TMR and PTMR groups. However, analysis of rumen bacteria revealed that the Sob, Ace, Bootstrap, Shannon, and Chao indices were significantly lower in the PTMR group compared to TMR group (p<0.05). Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were the predominant bacteria in all groups, with the abundance of Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001 was significantly lower in the PTMR group. The relative abundance of Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, NK4A214_group, and Streptococcus, was significantly higher in the TMR group than in the PTMR group (p<0.05). Bacterial function prediction showed downregulation of energy production and conversion pathway in the PTMR group (p<0.05). Correlation analysis indicated that norank_f_Bacteroidales_RF16 positively correlated with butyric acid (p<0.05), while Anaerovibrio negatively correlated with acetic, propionic acids, butyric acid, and total volatile fatty acids (p<0.05).

Conclusion: In summary, this study demonstrated that PTMR, while reducing rumen bacterial abundance in Hu sheep, significantly increased their average daily gain and dry matter intake, indicating its potential for practical application.

评价颗粒状全混合日粮对湖羊的饲养效果:生长、瘤胃发酵和瘤胃细菌群落。
目的:比较饲喂全混合日粮(TMR)和颗粒状全混合日粮(PTMR)育肥湖羊的生长性能、瘤胃发酵和瘤胃细菌群落,并评价其饲养效率。方法:选取48只湖羊,随机分为两组(TMR组和PTMR组),每组6圈,每圈4只羊。在整个试验过程中测量体重和采食量,评价生长性能。在试验的最后一天,在饲喂后2小时用瘤胃液收集器收集绵羊的瘤胃液。结论:综上所述,本研究表明,PTMR在降低胡羊瘤胃细菌丰度的同时,显著提高了胡羊的平均日增重和干物质采食量,具有实际应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Bioscience
Animal Bioscience AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
223
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信