Shared Decision-Making for Restoring Trust in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the Post-pandemic Era.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Warren J Wexelman, Nicole Ciffone, Nishant P Shah
{"title":"Shared Decision-Making for Restoring Trust in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the Post-pandemic Era.","authors":"Warren J Wexelman, Nicole Ciffone, Nishant P Shah","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03182-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Real-world data indicate that the management of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is suboptimal in clinical practice and that many patients fail to reach guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. This may be due in part to physician inertia with regard to prescribing appropriate lipid-lowering therapies or poor adherence to such therapies in real-world practice. Shared decision-making is a collaborative process in which patients and healthcare professionals work together to develop treatment plans and management strategies that consider an individual's values and preferences, as well as clinical evidence. In this commentary, two preventive cardiologists and a nurse practitioner working in US practice discuss their real-world experiences of shared decision-making as well as key benefits such as helping to tackle the negative impacts of medical misinformation to restore patients' trust in healthcare professionals. Other potential benefits of shared decision-making include increased adherence to therapy and greater trust between patients and healthcare professionals. Finally, the authors discuss proposed solutions for potential barriers to the implementation of shared decision-making, including the support of a multidisciplinary team, the provision of learning materials from trustworthy sources, and tailoring of discussions to the individual patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03182-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Real-world data indicate that the management of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is suboptimal in clinical practice and that many patients fail to reach guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. This may be due in part to physician inertia with regard to prescribing appropriate lipid-lowering therapies or poor adherence to such therapies in real-world practice. Shared decision-making is a collaborative process in which patients and healthcare professionals work together to develop treatment plans and management strategies that consider an individual's values and preferences, as well as clinical evidence. In this commentary, two preventive cardiologists and a nurse practitioner working in US practice discuss their real-world experiences of shared decision-making as well as key benefits such as helping to tackle the negative impacts of medical misinformation to restore patients' trust in healthcare professionals. Other potential benefits of shared decision-making include increased adherence to therapy and greater trust between patients and healthcare professionals. Finally, the authors discuss proposed solutions for potential barriers to the implementation of shared decision-making, including the support of a multidisciplinary team, the provision of learning materials from trustworthy sources, and tailoring of discussions to the individual patient.

大流行后时代动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病管理中重建信任的共同决策
实际数据表明,在临床实践中,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的管理并不理想,许多患者未能达到指南推荐的LDL-C目标。这可能部分是由于医生在处方适当的降脂疗法方面的惯性或在实际实践中对此类疗法的依从性差。共同决策是一个协作过程,患者和医疗保健专业人员共同制定治疗计划和管理策略,考虑到个人的价值观和偏好,以及临床证据。在这篇评论中,两位预防心脏病专家和一位在美国工作的执业护士讨论了他们共同决策的真实世界经验,以及帮助解决医疗错误信息的负面影响以恢复患者对医疗保健专业人员的信任等关键益处。共同决策的其他潜在好处包括增加对治疗的依从性,增强患者和医疗保健专业人员之间的信任。最后,作者讨论了实施共同决策的潜在障碍的建议解决方案,包括多学科团队的支持,从可靠来源提供学习材料,以及针对个体患者的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信