Margins in major salivary gland surgery: clinical and pathological criteria for defining margins and their implications on the choice of multimodal therapies. A systematic review.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Marco de Vincentiis, Giulio Pagliuca, Valerio Margani, Vanessa Di Stefano, Giovanni Succo, Erika Crosetti, Cesare Piazza, Federica Zoccali, Diletta Angeletti, Andrea Gallo
{"title":"Margins in major salivary gland surgery: clinical and pathological criteria for defining margins and their implications on the choice of multimodal therapies. A systematic review.","authors":"Marco de Vincentiis, Giulio Pagliuca, Valerio Margani, Vanessa Di Stefano, Giovanni Succo, Erika Crosetti, Cesare Piazza, Federica Zoccali, Diletta Angeletti, Andrea Gallo","doi":"10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Major salivary gland malignancies (MSGM) are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumours accounting for 1-5% of all head and neck cancers. When feasible, surgical removal with negative margins is the preferred treatment, reserving adjuvant radiotherapy for adverse clinicopathological features such as high-grade, advanced-stage, extranodal extension, lympho-vascular invasion, perineural invasion, and positive margins. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current literature on the definition of negative and close margins for MSGM, their impact on loco-regional recurrence (LRR), disease-free (DFS), and overall survival (OS), and their implications in the choice of multimodal therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online search of articles published between 2004 and 2024 was carried out using PubMed via a PICO search strategy for qualitative questions and written following the PRISMA statement guidelines. The following parameters were evaluated: definition of free and close margins, and their impact on local control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search yielded 158 articles. Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 30 full-text publications were reviewed. All studies were retrospective. A total of 15,985 patients who underwent surgery were considered. Margin involvement ranged widely among the studies from 14.3% to 65.4%. Five out of 30 studies reported no data about association between margins and LRR, DFS, and OS. Twenty of 25 studies reported a significant correlation between positive margins and oncological outcomes regardless of the histological types, while 5 focused on high-stage cancers or more aggressive histotypes and described no association between margin status and oncological outcomes. Nine of 30 studies described close margins in the absence of a univocal definition of threshold for close vs. negative margins. Most studies did not report a significant correlation between close margins and oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical resection achieving negative margins is recommended for MSGM. Positive margin is widely considered an adverse clinicopathological feature and performing adjuvant radiotherapy has documented survival benefits. A consensus involving a definition of close margin is missing, although further treatment is not recommended, preferring a watch-and-wait approach in presence of close margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":6890,"journal":{"name":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","volume":"45 Suppl. 1","pages":"S109-S120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Major salivary gland malignancies (MSGM) are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumours accounting for 1-5% of all head and neck cancers. When feasible, surgical removal with negative margins is the preferred treatment, reserving adjuvant radiotherapy for adverse clinicopathological features such as high-grade, advanced-stage, extranodal extension, lympho-vascular invasion, perineural invasion, and positive margins. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current literature on the definition of negative and close margins for MSGM, their impact on loco-regional recurrence (LRR), disease-free (DFS), and overall survival (OS), and their implications in the choice of multimodal therapies.

Methods: An online search of articles published between 2004 and 2024 was carried out using PubMed via a PICO search strategy for qualitative questions and written following the PRISMA statement guidelines. The following parameters were evaluated: definition of free and close margins, and their impact on local control.

Results: The initial search yielded 158 articles. Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 30 full-text publications were reviewed. All studies were retrospective. A total of 15,985 patients who underwent surgery were considered. Margin involvement ranged widely among the studies from 14.3% to 65.4%. Five out of 30 studies reported no data about association between margins and LRR, DFS, and OS. Twenty of 25 studies reported a significant correlation between positive margins and oncological outcomes regardless of the histological types, while 5 focused on high-stage cancers or more aggressive histotypes and described no association between margin status and oncological outcomes. Nine of 30 studies described close margins in the absence of a univocal definition of threshold for close vs. negative margins. Most studies did not report a significant correlation between close margins and oncological outcomes.

Conclusions: Surgical resection achieving negative margins is recommended for MSGM. Positive margin is widely considered an adverse clinicopathological feature and performing adjuvant radiotherapy has documented survival benefits. A consensus involving a definition of close margin is missing, although further treatment is not recommended, preferring a watch-and-wait approach in presence of close margins.

大唾液腺手术的边缘:定义边缘的临床和病理标准及其对多模式治疗选择的影响。系统回顾。
目的:大涎腺恶性肿瘤(MSGM)是一种罕见且异质性的肿瘤,占所有头颈部肿瘤的1-5%。在可行的情况下,手术切除阴性切缘是首选的治疗方法,对于不良的临床病理特征,如高度、晚期、结外延伸、淋巴血管浸润、神经周围浸润和阳性切缘,保留辅助放疗。本系统综述旨在评估目前关于MSGM阴性和闭合切缘定义的文献,它们对局部-区域复发(LRR)、无病(DFS)和总生存(OS)的影响,以及它们对多模式治疗选择的影响。方法:使用PubMed对2004年至2024年间发表的文章进行在线搜索,采用PICO搜索策略对定性问题进行搜索,并按照PRISMA声明指南编写。评估了以下参数:自由和封闭边际的定义,以及它们对局部控制的影响。结果:最初的搜索产生了158篇文章。在采用纳入和排除标准之后,审查了30份全文出版物。所有研究均为回顾性研究。总共有15985名患者接受了手术。在研究中,切缘涉及的范围从14.3%到65.4%不等。30项研究中有5项报告没有关于切缘与LRR、DFS和OS之间关联的数据。25项研究中有20项报告了阳性切缘与肿瘤结果之间的显著相关性,而与组织学类型无关,而5项研究侧重于晚期癌症或更具侵袭性的组织类型,并没有描述切缘状态与肿瘤结果之间的关联。30项研究中有9项描述了闭合边缘,但没有明确定义闭合边缘与负边缘的阈值。大多数研究没有报道近切缘与肿瘤预后之间的显著相关性。结论:手术切除达到阴性边缘推荐MSGM。切缘阳性被广泛认为是一种不良的临床病理特征,进行辅助放疗对生存有好处。虽然不建议进一步治疗,但缺乏关于近切缘定义的共识,更倾向于观察和等待近切缘存在的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica first appeared as “Annali di Laringologia Otologia e Faringologia” and was founded in 1901 by Giulio Masini. It is the official publication of the Italian Hospital Otology Association (A.O.O.I.) and, since 1976, also of the Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale (S.I.O.Ch.C.-F.). The journal publishes original articles (clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional surveys, and diagnostic test assessments) of interest in the field of otorhinolaryngology as well as clinical techniques and technology (a short report of unique or original methods for surgical techniques, medical management or new devices or technology), editorials (including editorial guests – special contribution) and letters to the Editor-in-Chief. Articles concerning science investigations and well prepared systematic reviews (including meta-analyses) on themes related to basic science, clinical otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery have high priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信