{"title":"Infection dynamics of endosymbionts that manipulate arthropod reproduction.","authors":"Franziska A Brenninger, Roman Zug, Hanna Kokko","doi":"10.1111/brv.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A large proportion of arthropod species are infected with endosymbionts, some of which selfishly alter host reproduction. The currently known forms of parasitic reproductive manipulations are male-killing, feminization, cytoplasmic incompatibility, parthenogenesis induction and distortion of sex allocation. While all of these phenomena represent adaptations that enhance parasite spread, they differ in the mechanisms involved and the consequent infection dynamics. We focus here on the latter aspect, summarizing existing theoretical literature on infection dynamics of all known reproductive manipulation types, and completing the remaining knowledge gaps where dynamics have not been modelled yet. Our unified framework includes the minimal model components required to describe the effects of each manipulation. We establish invasion criteria for all potential combinations of manipulative endosymbionts, yielding predictions for an endosymbiont's increase from rarity within a host population that is initially either uninfected or infected with a different symbiont strain. We consider diplodiploid and haplodiploid hosts, as the mechanisms as well as the infection dynamics of reproductive manipulations can differ between them. Our framework reveals that endosymbionts that a priori have the best invasion prospects are not necessarily the most commonly found ones in nature; priority effects play a role too, and cytoplasmic incompatibility excels in this regard. As a whole, considerations of the ease with which a symbiont spreads have to be complemented with knowledge of how easy it is to achieve a particular manipulation, and with factors influencing the probability that interspecific host switching occurs and succeeds.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A large proportion of arthropod species are infected with endosymbionts, some of which selfishly alter host reproduction. The currently known forms of parasitic reproductive manipulations are male-killing, feminization, cytoplasmic incompatibility, parthenogenesis induction and distortion of sex allocation. While all of these phenomena represent adaptations that enhance parasite spread, they differ in the mechanisms involved and the consequent infection dynamics. We focus here on the latter aspect, summarizing existing theoretical literature on infection dynamics of all known reproductive manipulation types, and completing the remaining knowledge gaps where dynamics have not been modelled yet. Our unified framework includes the minimal model components required to describe the effects of each manipulation. We establish invasion criteria for all potential combinations of manipulative endosymbionts, yielding predictions for an endosymbiont's increase from rarity within a host population that is initially either uninfected or infected with a different symbiont strain. We consider diplodiploid and haplodiploid hosts, as the mechanisms as well as the infection dynamics of reproductive manipulations can differ between them. Our framework reveals that endosymbionts that a priori have the best invasion prospects are not necessarily the most commonly found ones in nature; priority effects play a role too, and cytoplasmic incompatibility excels in this regard. As a whole, considerations of the ease with which a symbiont spreads have to be complemented with knowledge of how easy it is to achieve a particular manipulation, and with factors influencing the probability that interspecific host switching occurs and succeeds.
期刊介绍:
Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly.
The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions.
The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field.
Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.