Actual evapotranspiration and variable crop coefficients for scheduling turfgrass irrigation

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Bernd Leinauer, Dawn M. VanLeeuwen, Rossana Sallenave, Tatiana Kardashina, Dan Smeal
{"title":"Actual evapotranspiration and variable crop coefficients for scheduling turfgrass irrigation","authors":"Bernd Leinauer,&nbsp;Dawn M. VanLeeuwen,&nbsp;Rossana Sallenave,&nbsp;Tatiana Kardashina,&nbsp;Dan Smeal","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Turfgrass irrigation based on evaporative requirements strengthens water conservation efforts. A study was conducted from 1998 to 2000 to determine actual evapotranspiration (ET<sub>a</sub>) of warm and cool-season turfgrasses and to develop crop coefficient (<i>K</i><sub>C</sub>) values normalized for growing degree days. Predicted values of maximum ET<sub>a</sub> and <i>K</i><sub>C</sub> were calculated, and data from a second study were used to validate the fitted polynomial functions. Estimated ET<sub>a</sub> differed in 1998 and 1999 and ranged from 5.42 mm day<sup>−1</sup> (<i>Poa pratensis</i> L. ‘Adelphi’ in 1998) to 6.69 mm day<sup>−1</sup> (<i>Lolium perenne</i> L. ‘Seville’ in 1999) for cool-season turfgrasses (CS) and from 4.54 mm day<sup>−1</sup> [<i>Buchloe dactyloides</i> (Nutt.) Engelm. ‘Bison’ in 1999] to 5.15 mm day<sup>−1</sup> [<i>Cynodon dactylon</i> (L.) Pers. ‘Guymon’ in 1998] for warm-season turfgrasses (WS). For CS, between-year variation was greater than differences within years, but for WS, within-year differences were greater than between years. A quadratic function was used to model the trend in <i>K</i><sub>C</sub>. For CS, <i>K</i><sub>C</sub> differed among years, with similar trends in 1998 and 1999. Generally, values for CS ranged from 0.76 to 0.95 and for WS from 0.68 to 0.76. We were unable to establish a clear trend that would group both CS and WS into high water use versus low water use. If a variable <i>K</i><sub>C</sub> based on our models had been applied during the 3-year period, irrigation amounts would have been reduced by approximately 10% for CS and by 15% for WS when compared to a constant <i>K</i><sub>C</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Turfgrass irrigation based on evaporative requirements strengthens water conservation efforts. A study was conducted from 1998 to 2000 to determine actual evapotranspiration (ETa) of warm and cool-season turfgrasses and to develop crop coefficient (KC) values normalized for growing degree days. Predicted values of maximum ETa and KC were calculated, and data from a second study were used to validate the fitted polynomial functions. Estimated ETa differed in 1998 and 1999 and ranged from 5.42 mm day−1 (Poa pratensis L. ‘Adelphi’ in 1998) to 6.69 mm day−1 (Lolium perenne L. ‘Seville’ in 1999) for cool-season turfgrasses (CS) and from 4.54 mm day−1 [Buchloe dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm. ‘Bison’ in 1999] to 5.15 mm day−1 [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. ‘Guymon’ in 1998] for warm-season turfgrasses (WS). For CS, between-year variation was greater than differences within years, but for WS, within-year differences were greater than between years. A quadratic function was used to model the trend in KC. For CS, KC differed among years, with similar trends in 1998 and 1999. Generally, values for CS ranged from 0.76 to 0.95 and for WS from 0.68 to 0.76. We were unable to establish a clear trend that would group both CS and WS into high water use versus low water use. If a variable KC based on our models had been applied during the 3-year period, irrigation amounts would have been reduced by approximately 10% for CS and by 15% for WS when compared to a constant KC.

实际蒸散量和可变作物系数用于安排草坪草灌溉
基于蒸发需求的草坪草灌溉加强了节水工作。1998 ~ 2000年对暖季和冷季草坪草的实际蒸散量(ETa)进行了测定,并对作物系数(KC)进行了标准化处理。计算最大ETa和KC的预测值,并使用第二项研究的数据验证拟合的多项式函数。估计ETa在1998年和1999年不同,范围从5.42 mm day - 1(1998年的Poa pratensis L. ' Adelphi ‘)到6.69 mm day - 1(1999年的Lolium perenne L. ’ Seville '),以及4.54 mm day - 1 [Buchloe dactyloides (Nutt.)]。Engelm。“野牛”在1999年]至5.15毫米天−1[长齿鲨(L.)]珀耳斯。‘ Guymon ’(1998年)用于暖季草坪草。CS的年间差异大于年内差异,WS的年内差异大于年间差异。利用二次函数对KC的变化趋势进行了建模,KC在1998年和1999年具有相似的变化趋势。一般来说,CS的值在0.76到0.95之间,WS在0.68到0.76之间。我们无法建立一个明确的趋势,将CS和WS分为高用水量和低用水量。如果在3年期间采用基于我们模型的可变KC,与恒定KC相比,CS的灌溉量将减少约10%,WS的灌溉量将减少15%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信