Communication as an Unequal Game: Insights Into Language Barriers and Missed Opportunities From the Perspectives of Nurses, Doctors, and Professional Interpreters

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lisbeth Birkelund, Karin Brochstedt Dieperink, Morten Sodemann, Johanna Falby Lindell, Karina Dahl Steffensen, Dorthe Susanne Nielsen
{"title":"Communication as an Unequal Game: Insights Into Language Barriers and Missed Opportunities From the Perspectives of Nurses, Doctors, and Professional Interpreters","authors":"Lisbeth Birkelund,&nbsp;Karin Brochstedt Dieperink,&nbsp;Morten Sodemann,&nbsp;Johanna Falby Lindell,&nbsp;Karina Dahl Steffensen,&nbsp;Dorthe Susanne Nielsen","doi":"10.1155/ecc/8873921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Objective:</b> In the context of serious illnesses, such as cancer, effective communication is vital. This study explores how registered nurses (RNs), medical doctors (MDs), and professional interpreters (PIs) experience communication in cancer care with patients who have limited proficiency in the dominant language.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A phenomenological-hermeneutic approach was employed using focus group interviews. A total of 23 informants participated and were divided into six groups: three groups of nurses, two groups of doctors, and one group of interpreters. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, with Paul Ricoeur’s critical hermeneutics serving as the theoretical framework for analysis and interpretation.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The overarching theme identified was <i>Communication as an Unequal Game</i>, with three subthemes: (1) <i>Communicating on unequal terms</i>, (2) <i>Lack of agreed roles and shared rules</i>, and (3) <i>Missing opportunities as an invisible consequence</i>. The findings reveal an experience across professions of being at a disadvantage from the start due to strict time constraints and lack of access to essential knowledge. Differing views on the roles of interpreters, including whether they should act as robots or engage as human beings, further complicate communication. Without clearly agreed-upon roles and shared rules, decisions about briefing or booking interpreters come to rely on individual perceptions, leading to inconsistent practices and communication inequalities among professional groups. The findings highlight the less visible consequences of language barriers in healthcare encounters, including lack of treatment options being presented to patients and the mental and physical withdrawal of nurses when no interpreters are available to facilitate verbal communication.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> While it is necessary to embrace the inherent complexity of language-discordant communication, it is equally important to establish a more level and stable “playing field,” including targeted interprofessional collaboration. In the current unequal game of communication, language barriers not only impede effective communication but also make choices—and care—disappear.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/8873921","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/8873921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In the context of serious illnesses, such as cancer, effective communication is vital. This study explores how registered nurses (RNs), medical doctors (MDs), and professional interpreters (PIs) experience communication in cancer care with patients who have limited proficiency in the dominant language.

Methods: A phenomenological-hermeneutic approach was employed using focus group interviews. A total of 23 informants participated and were divided into six groups: three groups of nurses, two groups of doctors, and one group of interpreters. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, with Paul Ricoeur’s critical hermeneutics serving as the theoretical framework for analysis and interpretation.

Results: The overarching theme identified was Communication as an Unequal Game, with three subthemes: (1) Communicating on unequal terms, (2) Lack of agreed roles and shared rules, and (3) Missing opportunities as an invisible consequence. The findings reveal an experience across professions of being at a disadvantage from the start due to strict time constraints and lack of access to essential knowledge. Differing views on the roles of interpreters, including whether they should act as robots or engage as human beings, further complicate communication. Without clearly agreed-upon roles and shared rules, decisions about briefing or booking interpreters come to rely on individual perceptions, leading to inconsistent practices and communication inequalities among professional groups. The findings highlight the less visible consequences of language barriers in healthcare encounters, including lack of treatment options being presented to patients and the mental and physical withdrawal of nurses when no interpreters are available to facilitate verbal communication.

Conclusion: While it is necessary to embrace the inherent complexity of language-discordant communication, it is equally important to establish a more level and stable “playing field,” including targeted interprofessional collaboration. In the current unequal game of communication, language barriers not only impede effective communication but also make choices—and care—disappear.

沟通是一个不平等的游戏:从护士、医生和专业口译员的角度看语言障碍和错失的机会
目的:在严重疾病的情况下,如癌症,有效的沟通是至关重要的。本研究探讨注册护士(RNs)、医生(md)和专业口译员(pi)在癌症护理中如何与语言能力有限的患者进行沟通。方法:采用焦点小组访谈的现象学-解释学方法。共有23名被调查者被分为6组:3组护士、2组医生和1组口译员。所有访谈都被录音并逐字转录,保罗·利科的批判解释学作为分析和解释的理论框架。结果:确定的总体主题是“沟通是一种不平等的游戏”,包含三个子主题:(1)不平等条件下的沟通;(2)缺乏一致的角色和共享的规则;(3)作为无形后果的错失机会。调查结果显示,由于严格的时间限制和缺乏获得基本知识的途径,各行各业从一开始就处于不利地位。对口译员角色的不同看法,包括他们是应该像机器人一样工作还是像人类一样参与,进一步使沟通复杂化。没有明确商定的角色和共同的规则,关于简报或预订口译员的决定取决于个人的看法,导致专业团体之间的做法不一致和沟通不平等。研究结果强调了在医疗接触中语言障碍的不太明显的后果,包括缺乏向患者提供的治疗方案,以及在没有口译员帮助口头交流时护士的精神和身体退缩。结论:虽然有必要接受语言不和谐沟通的固有复杂性,但建立一个更公平、更稳定的“竞争环境”也同样重要,包括有针对性的跨专业合作。在当今不平等的交际游戏中,语言障碍不仅阻碍了有效的交际,而且使选择和关心消失了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer Care
European Journal of Cancer Care 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of: - Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients - Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care - Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients - Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care - Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members - International perspectives on cancer care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信