Liane Wagner, Martin Kaufmann, Frank Lange, André Dallmann, Meike Bergmann
{"title":"Differentiation of pork (Sus scrofa domesticus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa) meat using 1H NMR spectroscopy and MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry","authors":"Liane Wagner, Martin Kaufmann, Frank Lange, André Dallmann, Meike Bergmann","doi":"10.1007/s00217-025-04665-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The term ‘wild’ is a premium descriptor for food, often leading consumers to accept higher prices. This financial allure can encourage fraudsters to mislabel or substitute game meat with cheaper domestic pork. This study aimed to use a non-targeted <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectroscopy and/or MALDI-ToF–MS analysis, coupled with multivariate statistics, to distinguish between wild boar (<i>Sus scrofa</i>) and pork (<i>Sus scrofa domesticus</i>) meat. To accomplish this, we collected meat of wild boar, pork, and their processed versions for the analyses of <sup>1</sup>H NMR-based metabolomics (polar and apolar phases; 72 samples) and MALDI-ToF–MS-based proteomics (122 samples). Multivariate data analyses (PCA and OPLS-DA) revealed that pork meat showed higher levels of triglycerides and higher concentrations of certain metabolites such as carnosine, creatine and lactate. Conversely, wild boar meat contained higher levels of n-3 fatty acids (FA), polyunsaturated FA and exhibited higher concentrations of specific amino acids like glutamine and alanine. Additionally, we identified fumaric acid and malic acid as distinctive markers for wild boar meat. Our MALDI-ToF–MS analyses also enabled us to differentiate between wild boar and pork meat. However, when it comes to processed meat, the distinctions became blurred, making it impossible to clearly separate wild boar and pork processed meat. Furthermore, data fusion of <sup>1</sup>H NMR and MALDI-ToF–MS was applied to provide more accurate knowledge about the differentiation of wild boar and pork meat.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":549,"journal":{"name":"European Food Research and Technology","volume":"251 5","pages":"747 - 766"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Food Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00217-025-04665-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The term ‘wild’ is a premium descriptor for food, often leading consumers to accept higher prices. This financial allure can encourage fraudsters to mislabel or substitute game meat with cheaper domestic pork. This study aimed to use a non-targeted 1H NMR spectroscopy and/or MALDI-ToF–MS analysis, coupled with multivariate statistics, to distinguish between wild boar (Sus scrofa) and pork (Sus scrofa domesticus) meat. To accomplish this, we collected meat of wild boar, pork, and their processed versions for the analyses of 1H NMR-based metabolomics (polar and apolar phases; 72 samples) and MALDI-ToF–MS-based proteomics (122 samples). Multivariate data analyses (PCA and OPLS-DA) revealed that pork meat showed higher levels of triglycerides and higher concentrations of certain metabolites such as carnosine, creatine and lactate. Conversely, wild boar meat contained higher levels of n-3 fatty acids (FA), polyunsaturated FA and exhibited higher concentrations of specific amino acids like glutamine and alanine. Additionally, we identified fumaric acid and malic acid as distinctive markers for wild boar meat. Our MALDI-ToF–MS analyses also enabled us to differentiate between wild boar and pork meat. However, when it comes to processed meat, the distinctions became blurred, making it impossible to clearly separate wild boar and pork processed meat. Furthermore, data fusion of 1H NMR and MALDI-ToF–MS was applied to provide more accurate knowledge about the differentiation of wild boar and pork meat.
期刊介绍:
The journal European Food Research and Technology publishes state-of-the-art research papers and review articles on fundamental and applied food research. The journal''s mission is the fast publication of high quality papers on front-line research, newest techniques and on developing trends in the following sections:
-chemistry and biochemistry-
technology and molecular biotechnology-
nutritional chemistry and toxicology-
analytical and sensory methodologies-
food physics.
Out of the scope of the journal are:
- contributions which are not of international interest or do not have a substantial impact on food sciences,
- submissions which comprise merely data collections, based on the use of routine analytical or bacteriological methods,
- contributions reporting biological or functional effects without profound chemical and/or physical structure characterization of the compound(s) under research.