Dimensional accuracy and resolution assessment of the formlabs form 3B 3D printer for medical applications

Q3 Medicine
Vera Lagerburg , Anne Vrancken , Sietske Bergsma , Janita Dekker , Wouter Diemer , Judith Waldner-Troost , Maaike Koenrades
{"title":"Dimensional accuracy and resolution assessment of the formlabs form 3B 3D printer for medical applications","authors":"Vera Lagerburg ,&nbsp;Anne Vrancken ,&nbsp;Sietske Bergsma ,&nbsp;Janita Dekker ,&nbsp;Wouter Diemer ,&nbsp;Judith Waldner-Troost ,&nbsp;Maaike Koenrades","doi":"10.1016/j.stlm.2025.100204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>For quality management of in-hospital 3D printing, it is essential to have detailed knowledge on the accuracy and reproducibility of the 3D printing process. In this study, the influence of several printing and post-processing parameters on dimensional accuracy and resolution were evaluated in three different hospitals to provide a reference for printer performance for medical applications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A custom phantom was designed comprising features to assess accuracy and resolution of the Form 3B printer (Formlabs, Somerville, MA, USA). Specific features common for surgical guides were included, such as slits, flanges, and cylinders. The phantoms were 3D printed using a medical grade resin (Formlabs Biomed Clear resin) and evaluated after postprocessing and sterilization. Dimensional accuracy was defined as the deviation between the actual measurement and the known feature dimension and evaluated in x-, y- and z-direction. Resolution was defined as the smallest complete feature.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The accuracy of the prints in the x-direction varied between -0.1 mm and 0.1 mm, in the y-direction between -0.25 mm and 0.4 mm and in the z-direction between -0.2 mm and 0.4 mm. The influence of sterilization on the accuracy was negligible. The smallest slit that was always open when printing in the x-direction was 0.3 mm and in the y-direction 0.4 mm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study provides hospitals with a reference for the printing accuracy and resolution for a medical grade resin. The phantom designed can be used in every hospital to determine their own printing accuracy and tolerances thereby optimizing product design for the intended clinical application.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72210,"journal":{"name":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964125000190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

For quality management of in-hospital 3D printing, it is essential to have detailed knowledge on the accuracy and reproducibility of the 3D printing process. In this study, the influence of several printing and post-processing parameters on dimensional accuracy and resolution were evaluated in three different hospitals to provide a reference for printer performance for medical applications.

Methods

A custom phantom was designed comprising features to assess accuracy and resolution of the Form 3B printer (Formlabs, Somerville, MA, USA). Specific features common for surgical guides were included, such as slits, flanges, and cylinders. The phantoms were 3D printed using a medical grade resin (Formlabs Biomed Clear resin) and evaluated after postprocessing and sterilization. Dimensional accuracy was defined as the deviation between the actual measurement and the known feature dimension and evaluated in x-, y- and z-direction. Resolution was defined as the smallest complete feature.

Results

The accuracy of the prints in the x-direction varied between -0.1 mm and 0.1 mm, in the y-direction between -0.25 mm and 0.4 mm and in the z-direction between -0.2 mm and 0.4 mm. The influence of sterilization on the accuracy was negligible. The smallest slit that was always open when printing in the x-direction was 0.3 mm and in the y-direction 0.4 mm.

Conclusion

This study provides hospitals with a reference for the printing accuracy and resolution for a medical grade resin. The phantom designed can be used in every hospital to determine their own printing accuracy and tolerances thereby optimizing product design for the intended clinical application.
用于医疗应用的formlabs form 3B 3D打印机的尺寸精度和分辨率评估
对于医院内3D打印的质量管理,对3D打印过程的准确性和可重复性有详细的了解是必不可少的。本研究通过对三家不同医院的打印和后处理参数对尺寸精度和分辨率的影响进行评估,为医疗应用中的打印机性能提供参考。方法设计一个定制模型,包括评估Form 3B打印机的精度和分辨率的特征(Formlabs, Somerville, MA, USA)。包括手术指南常见的特定特征,如狭缝、法兰和圆柱体。这些模型使用医用级树脂(Formlabs Biomed Clear树脂)进行3D打印,并在后处理和灭菌后进行评估。尺寸精度定义为实际测量值与已知特征尺寸之间的偏差,并在x, y和z方向上进行评估。分辨率被定义为最小的完整特征。结果x -0.1 mm ~ 0.1 mm、y -0.25 mm ~ 0.4 mm、z -0.2 mm ~ 0.4 mm之间的指纹图谱精度均有显著差异。灭菌对准确性的影响可以忽略不计。x方向和y方向的最小开缝分别为0.3 mm和0.4 mm。结论为医用级树脂的打印精度和分辨率提供了参考。所设计的模体可用于各医院,以确定各自的打印精度和公差,从而优化产品设计,以达到预期的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of 3D printed medicine
Annals of 3D printed medicine Medicine and Dentistry (General), Materials Science (General)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
131 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信