Numerical investigation of internal erosion mechanisms regarding stratigraphy: Agly dike case study

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Zezhi Deng , Nadia Benahmed , Laurence Girolami , Pierre Philippe , Stéphane Bonelli , Gang Wang
{"title":"Numerical investigation of internal erosion mechanisms regarding stratigraphy: Agly dike case study","authors":"Zezhi Deng ,&nbsp;Nadia Benahmed ,&nbsp;Laurence Girolami ,&nbsp;Pierre Philippe ,&nbsp;Stéphane Bonelli ,&nbsp;Gang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Internal erosion poses a significant threat to the safety of the water-retaining structures. Due to its subterranean nature, the process of internal erosion is difficult to observe directly and evaluate properly, even when typical erosion signatures are captured at the surface. Therefore, predicting internal erosion or elucidating the underlying mechanisms of superficial erosion indicators remain considerable challenges in geotechnical engineering. In this study, a numerical investigation was conducted to explore the mechanism responsible for the numerous erosion signatures (sinkholes, sand-boils, and leaks) observed at the Agly dike, in France, through a cooperated geophysical-numerical approach. Simulated configurations were mapped according to the actual stratigraphic structures identified by geophysical results (EMI and ERT). A multispecies transport finite element method was employed to examine the seepage and suffusion dynamics under periodic flooding conditions. Systematic comparative analysis demonstrated that the unique stratigraphic structures and geometries played a governing role in the occurrence of erosion signatures in situ. Specifically, the paleo-channel throat promotes sinkhole formation via suffusion and contact erosion, while confined pore pressure acting on the low-permeable surface layer induced the emergence of sand-boil and leak. Our findings underscore the crucial role of stratigraphic features on internal erosion processes and demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating geophysical investigations with numerical modeling for assessing internal erosion risks in engineering applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 108118"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795225002145","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internal erosion poses a significant threat to the safety of the water-retaining structures. Due to its subterranean nature, the process of internal erosion is difficult to observe directly and evaluate properly, even when typical erosion signatures are captured at the surface. Therefore, predicting internal erosion or elucidating the underlying mechanisms of superficial erosion indicators remain considerable challenges in geotechnical engineering. In this study, a numerical investigation was conducted to explore the mechanism responsible for the numerous erosion signatures (sinkholes, sand-boils, and leaks) observed at the Agly dike, in France, through a cooperated geophysical-numerical approach. Simulated configurations were mapped according to the actual stratigraphic structures identified by geophysical results (EMI and ERT). A multispecies transport finite element method was employed to examine the seepage and suffusion dynamics under periodic flooding conditions. Systematic comparative analysis demonstrated that the unique stratigraphic structures and geometries played a governing role in the occurrence of erosion signatures in situ. Specifically, the paleo-channel throat promotes sinkhole formation via suffusion and contact erosion, while confined pore pressure acting on the low-permeable surface layer induced the emergence of sand-boil and leak. Our findings underscore the crucial role of stratigraphic features on internal erosion processes and demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating geophysical investigations with numerical modeling for assessing internal erosion risks in engineering applications.
关于地层学的内部侵蚀机制的数值研究:Agly堤防案例研究
内部侵蚀对挡水结构的安全构成重大威胁。由于其地下性质,即使在地表捕获了典型的侵蚀特征,也难以直接观察和正确评估内部侵蚀过程。因此,预测内部侵蚀或阐明表面侵蚀指标的潜在机制仍然是岩土工程中相当大的挑战。在这项研究中,通过地球物理-数值方法的合作,进行了数值调查,以探索在法国Agly堤防观测到的众多侵蚀特征(天坑、沙沸腾和泄漏)的机制。根据地球物理结果(电磁干扰和ERT)识别的实际地层结构,绘制了模拟构造图。采用多物种输运有限元法研究了周期性洪水条件下的渗流和渗流动力学。系统的对比分析表明,独特的地层构造和几何形状对原位侵蚀特征的发生起着支配作用。具体而言,古通道喉部通过渗透和接触侵蚀促进了天坑的形成,而作用于低渗透表面层的封闭孔隙压力则诱发了砂沸和泄漏的发生。我们的研究结果强调了地层特征在内部侵蚀过程中的关键作用,并证明了将地球物理调查与数值模拟相结合以评估工程应用中内部侵蚀风险的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Geology
Engineering Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
12.20%
发文量
327
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信