{"title":"Rethinking local thermal sensation prediction: The role of heat flux over skin temperature in personalized models","authors":"Jaafar Younes, Dolaana Khovalyg","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As personal environmental control systems (PECS) gain prominence over conventional whole-space conditioning, accurately predicting personalized and localized thermal sensation (TS) becomes increasingly important. This study systematically evaluates the relative performance of two physiological predictors—local skin temperature and local heat flux (rate of heat dissipation from body)— in data-driven models of localized TS. Drawing on data from two human subject experiments that captured both physiological signals and subjective thermal responses, we address key research questions concerning <strong>(i)</strong> the predictive accuracy of skin temperature versus heat flux, <strong>(ii)</strong> regional variations in model performance across 16 body segments, <strong>(iii)</strong> the influence of different modelling strategies (i.e., separate models per subject/body part versus a unified model with individual-specific features), and <strong>(iv)</strong> model robustness when applied to an independent dataset.</div><div>Results indicate that incorporating personalized and localized modelling strategies can reduce prediction error relative to non-personalized/localized approaches. Most body regions exhibited comparable performance between skin temperature- and heat flux-based models, while skin temperature-based models outperformed in extremities, such as the hand (error of 0.42 versus 0.56). We hypothesize that this performance difference can arise from the complex relationship between heat flux and TS in extremities due to the influence of vasomotor thermoregulation. Conversely, when testing model robustness on an independent dataset, heat flux-based models exhibit a lower error for the hand (0.36 versus 0.49). Findings establish heat flux as a viable alternative to skin temperature in predicting local TS. These advancements are crucial in optimizing the design and control of next-generation PECS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"281 ","pages":"Article 113195"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325006754","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As personal environmental control systems (PECS) gain prominence over conventional whole-space conditioning, accurately predicting personalized and localized thermal sensation (TS) becomes increasingly important. This study systematically evaluates the relative performance of two physiological predictors—local skin temperature and local heat flux (rate of heat dissipation from body)— in data-driven models of localized TS. Drawing on data from two human subject experiments that captured both physiological signals and subjective thermal responses, we address key research questions concerning (i) the predictive accuracy of skin temperature versus heat flux, (ii) regional variations in model performance across 16 body segments, (iii) the influence of different modelling strategies (i.e., separate models per subject/body part versus a unified model with individual-specific features), and (iv) model robustness when applied to an independent dataset.
Results indicate that incorporating personalized and localized modelling strategies can reduce prediction error relative to non-personalized/localized approaches. Most body regions exhibited comparable performance between skin temperature- and heat flux-based models, while skin temperature-based models outperformed in extremities, such as the hand (error of 0.42 versus 0.56). We hypothesize that this performance difference can arise from the complex relationship between heat flux and TS in extremities due to the influence of vasomotor thermoregulation. Conversely, when testing model robustness on an independent dataset, heat flux-based models exhibit a lower error for the hand (0.36 versus 0.49). Findings establish heat flux as a viable alternative to skin temperature in predicting local TS. These advancements are crucial in optimizing the design and control of next-generation PECS.
随着个人环境控制系统(PECS)逐渐取代传统的全空间调节系统,准确预测个性化和局部热感觉(TS)变得越来越重要。本研究系统地评估了数据驱动的局部TS模型中两种生理预测指标——局部皮肤温度和局部热流密度(身体散热率)的相对性能。利用两个人体受试者实验的数据,捕获了生理信号和主观热反应,我们解决了以下关键研究问题:(1)皮肤温度与热流密度的预测准确性;(二)跨16个身体部位的模型性能的区域差异,(三)不同建模策略的影响(即每个受试者/身体部位的单独模型与具有个体特定特征的统一模型),以及(四)应用于独立数据集时的模型稳健性。结果表明,与非个性化/本地化方法相比,结合个性化和本地化建模策略可以减少预测误差。大多数身体区域在基于皮肤温度和热流的模型之间表现出相当的性能,而基于皮肤温度的模型在四肢(如手)上表现更好(误差为0.42对0.56)。我们假设,由于血管舒缩性体温调节的影响,这种性能差异可能是由热通量和四肢TS之间的复杂关系引起的。相反,当在独立数据集上测试模型稳健性时,基于热通量的模型显示出较低的手部误差(0.36 vs 0.49)。研究结果表明,热通量可以替代皮肤温度预测局部TS,这些进展对优化下一代PECS的设计和控制至关重要。
期刊介绍:
Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.