Reilly X. Cox , Lalantha Senevirathna , Sean Mulligan , Stefan Felder
{"title":"Particle tracking to assess safe fish transport through closed conduit components","authors":"Reilly X. Cox , Lalantha Senevirathna , Sean Mulligan , Stefan Felder","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fish travelling through closed conduit systems experience a range of hydrodynamic effects which can influence fish wellbeing and consequently ecological restoration and conservation outcomes. Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) models are a promising tool for assessing such effects to improve fish safety. In this study, Lagrangian sensors were used in a physical model, systematically testing hydrodynamic conditions in pipe components in conjunction with live fish tests of Australian silver perch (<em>Bidyanus bidyanus</em>) to determine safe fish transport thresholds and fish travel paths. CFD models of pipe components were validated using the Lagrangian sensor data and Discrete Phase Model (DPM) particles with good agreement of pressure and acceleration data. The implementation of a simple active particle function to represent fish movement greatly improved the particle paths in the model, matching trajectories of live fish transported through the pipe components. Utilising active paths, the CFD models identified additional hydrodynamic threshold values to prevent fish injury. CFD modelling of larger pipes suggested that closed conduit fish passage through full-scale pipes present similar risk to laboratory-scale tests. These findings show that CFD models will assist the sustainable design of closed conduit fishways, which can improve river connectivity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 107677"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742500165X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fish travelling through closed conduit systems experience a range of hydrodynamic effects which can influence fish wellbeing and consequently ecological restoration and conservation outcomes. Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) models are a promising tool for assessing such effects to improve fish safety. In this study, Lagrangian sensors were used in a physical model, systematically testing hydrodynamic conditions in pipe components in conjunction with live fish tests of Australian silver perch (Bidyanus bidyanus) to determine safe fish transport thresholds and fish travel paths. CFD models of pipe components were validated using the Lagrangian sensor data and Discrete Phase Model (DPM) particles with good agreement of pressure and acceleration data. The implementation of a simple active particle function to represent fish movement greatly improved the particle paths in the model, matching trajectories of live fish transported through the pipe components. Utilising active paths, the CFD models identified additional hydrodynamic threshold values to prevent fish injury. CFD modelling of larger pipes suggested that closed conduit fish passage through full-scale pipes present similar risk to laboratory-scale tests. These findings show that CFD models will assist the sustainable design of closed conduit fishways, which can improve river connectivity.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.