Andreia Nobre Anciuti , Julia Gonçalves Rodrigues , Mariana Costa-Santos , Lucas Moraes Schaidt-Lopes , Isabella de Moura Folhadella Pires , Marcos de Lucca Moreira Gomes , Janaína Barcelos Porto Ferreira
{"title":"Less invasive sperm collection alternatives and implications for reproduction and conservation: A review","authors":"Andreia Nobre Anciuti , Julia Gonçalves Rodrigues , Mariana Costa-Santos , Lucas Moraes Schaidt-Lopes , Isabella de Moura Folhadella Pires , Marcos de Lucca Moreira Gomes , Janaína Barcelos Porto Ferreira","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Semen collection from laboratory and wild animals is essential for biomedical research, assisted reproduction programs, and conservation strategies for endangered species. This article presents a critical and comparative review of the main methods available, categorizing them into invasive techniques, traditional <em>in vivo</em> techniques, and less invasive alternatives. In addition to describing the procedures, the study evaluates the efficiency, applicability by species, level of invasiveness, cost, and ethical suitability of each approach. The analysis also integrates the principles of the 3Rs (Reduction, Refinement, and Replacement), highlighting methods that promote animal welfare. Based on recent data, this work provides an updated view on trends and innovations in sperm collection, encouraging the rational and ethical use of these practices in different scientific contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 105707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003452882500181X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Semen collection from laboratory and wild animals is essential for biomedical research, assisted reproduction programs, and conservation strategies for endangered species. This article presents a critical and comparative review of the main methods available, categorizing them into invasive techniques, traditional in vivo techniques, and less invasive alternatives. In addition to describing the procedures, the study evaluates the efficiency, applicability by species, level of invasiveness, cost, and ethical suitability of each approach. The analysis also integrates the principles of the 3Rs (Reduction, Refinement, and Replacement), highlighting methods that promote animal welfare. Based on recent data, this work provides an updated view on trends and innovations in sperm collection, encouraging the rational and ethical use of these practices in different scientific contexts.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.