Optimization of Cu/Zn/Al2O3 and Cu-Ga/Zn/Al2O3 catalysts using response surface methodology for methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production

IF 5.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Punampriya Borgohain , Pankaj Tiwari , Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay
{"title":"Optimization of Cu/Zn/Al2O3 and Cu-Ga/Zn/Al2O3 catalysts using response surface methodology for methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production","authors":"Punampriya Borgohain ,&nbsp;Pankaj Tiwari ,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay","doi":"10.1016/j.joei.2025.102155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Methanol steam reforming (MSR) is a highly efficient method for hydrogen production that offers a high hydrogen yield at relatively low operating temperatures. However, enhancing catalyst performance is essential to improve efficiency and reduce byproduct formation. This study utilized response surface methodology (RSM) with the Box-Behnken design (BBD) to systematically optimize the key factors affecting catalyst efficiency. CuZnAl<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (CZA) and CuGaZnAl<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (CGZA) catalysts were synthesized and tested for their activity, selectivity, and stability under different reaction conditions, including temperature, steam-to-methanol ratio (S/C), and gas hourly space velocity (GHSV). The statistical model developed using BBD provided valuable insights into the interaction between these variables, allowing for the identification of optimal conditions. The highest hydrogen yield of 2.28 mol was achieved while keeping carbon monoxide formation at a minimal 0.12 % under the optimized conditions of 275 °C, a S/C ratio of 2, and a GHSV of 14,500 hr<sup>−1</sup> for CGZA catalyst. The developed model was validated through experimental trials, demonstrating strong agreement between predicted and observed values. Additionally, catalyst characterization using techniques such as XRD, BET, Raman, SEM-EDX, TEM, TGA, and XPS confirmed structural and surface modifications contributing to catalytic performance. The study highlighted the effectiveness of RSM-BBD in catalyst optimization, offering a systematic and cost-effective approach to advancing hydrogen production technologies. Moreover, the Ga-modified Cu-based catalysts showed highly promising results for efficient and stable hydrogen production via MSR, with improved resistance to coke formation and deactivation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Energy Institute","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 102155"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Energy Institute","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743967125001837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methanol steam reforming (MSR) is a highly efficient method for hydrogen production that offers a high hydrogen yield at relatively low operating temperatures. However, enhancing catalyst performance is essential to improve efficiency and reduce byproduct formation. This study utilized response surface methodology (RSM) with the Box-Behnken design (BBD) to systematically optimize the key factors affecting catalyst efficiency. CuZnAl2O3 (CZA) and CuGaZnAl2O3 (CGZA) catalysts were synthesized and tested for their activity, selectivity, and stability under different reaction conditions, including temperature, steam-to-methanol ratio (S/C), and gas hourly space velocity (GHSV). The statistical model developed using BBD provided valuable insights into the interaction between these variables, allowing for the identification of optimal conditions. The highest hydrogen yield of 2.28 mol was achieved while keeping carbon monoxide formation at a minimal 0.12 % under the optimized conditions of 275 °C, a S/C ratio of 2, and a GHSV of 14,500 hr−1 for CGZA catalyst. The developed model was validated through experimental trials, demonstrating strong agreement between predicted and observed values. Additionally, catalyst characterization using techniques such as XRD, BET, Raman, SEM-EDX, TEM, TGA, and XPS confirmed structural and surface modifications contributing to catalytic performance. The study highlighted the effectiveness of RSM-BBD in catalyst optimization, offering a systematic and cost-effective approach to advancing hydrogen production technologies. Moreover, the Ga-modified Cu-based catalysts showed highly promising results for efficient and stable hydrogen production via MSR, with improved resistance to coke formation and deactivation.
响应面法优化Cu/Zn/Al2O3和Cu- ga /Zn/Al2O3催化剂用于甲醇蒸汽重整制氢
甲醇蒸汽重整(MSR)是一种高效的制氢方法,在相对较低的操作温度下提供高的氢气产量。然而,提高催化剂的性能对于提高效率和减少副产物的形成至关重要。本研究采用响应面法(RSM)和Box-Behnken设计(BBD)对影响催化剂效率的关键因素进行了系统优化。合成了CuZnAl2O3 (CZA)和CuGaZnAl2O3 (CGZA)催化剂,并在不同反应温度、蒸汽甲醇比(S/C)和气体时空速(GHSV)等条件下对其活性、选择性和稳定性进行了测试。利用BBD开发的统计模型为这些变量之间的相互作用提供了有价值的见解,从而可以确定最佳条件。在275℃、S/C比为2、GHSV为14500 hr−1的优化条件下,CGZA催化剂的产氢率最高,为2.28 mol,一氧化碳生成率最低,为0.12%。通过实验验证了所建立的模型,表明预测值与实测值之间具有很强的一致性。此外,使用XRD、BET、Raman、SEM-EDX、TEM、TGA和XPS等技术对催化剂进行了表征,证实了结构和表面改性对催化性能的影响。该研究强调了RSM-BBD在催化剂优化方面的有效性,为推进制氢技术提供了一种系统且具有成本效益的方法。此外,ga修饰的cu基催化剂在MSR高效稳定制氢方面表现出了良好的效果,并且具有更好的抗结焦性和抗失活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The Energy Institute
Journal of The Energy Institute 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
166
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Energy Institute provides peer reviewed coverage of original high quality research on energy, engineering and technology.The coverage is broad and the main areas of interest include: Combustion engineering and associated technologies; process heating; power generation; engines and propulsion; emissions and environmental pollution control; clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies Emissions and environmental pollution control; safety and hazards; Clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies, including carbon capture and storage, CCS; Petroleum engineering and fuel quality, including storage and transport Alternative energy sources; biomass utilisation and biomass conversion technologies; energy from waste, incineration and recycling Energy conversion, energy recovery and energy efficiency; space heating, fuel cells, heat pumps and cooling systems Energy storage The journal''s coverage reflects changes in energy technology that result from the transition to more efficient energy production and end use together with reduced carbon emission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信