Filipe Virgilio Ribeiro , Marcelo Porto Sousa , Marcio Yuri Ferreira , Filipi Fim Andreão , Lucca B. Palavani , Luis F. Fabrini Paleare , Gabriel Simoni , Eduardo Corrêa , Christian Ken Fukunaga , Lucas Pari Mitre , Rafaela Hamada Jucá , Rudolfh Batista Arend , Bruno Zilli Peroni , Alex Roman , Raphael Bertani , Herika Negri Brito , Allan Dias Polverini
{"title":"“Salvage surgery for vestibular schwannomas after failed stereotactic radiosurgery or radiation: A systematic review and meta-analysis”","authors":"Filipe Virgilio Ribeiro , Marcelo Porto Sousa , Marcio Yuri Ferreira , Filipi Fim Andreão , Lucca B. Palavani , Luis F. Fabrini Paleare , Gabriel Simoni , Eduardo Corrêa , Christian Ken Fukunaga , Lucas Pari Mitre , Rafaela Hamada Jucá , Rudolfh Batista Arend , Bruno Zilli Peroni , Alex Roman , Raphael Bertani , Herika Negri Brito , Allan Dias Polverini","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Stereotactic radiosurgery effectively controls vestibular schwannoma (VS). However, in certain cases, microsurgical resection may be necessary for tumor progression after radiosurgery or, after failure of the latter. The results on the safety and efficacy of salvage surgery for VS are still unclear, with scarce literature on the subject.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of salvage surgery on the resection of vestibular schwannomas that have been previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. We used single proportion analysis with 95 % confidence intervals under a random-effects model, I<sup>2</sup> to assess heterogeneity, and Baujat and sensitivity analysis to address high heterogeneity. Eligible studies included those with ≥ 4 patients treated with salvage surgery to resection of vestibular schwannomas after failure of stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 1841 initially identified studies, 18 were selected, involving 455 patients, with a median follow-up of 33 months. The combined analysis showed a 69 % (CI: 58 % − 79 %) rate of good clinical outcomes. Regarding partial resection, the pooled analysis confirmed a 48 % rate (CI: 33 % to 63 %) and a 52 % complete resection rate (CI: 37 % to 67 %). The pooled analysis confirmed a 95 % hearing preservation rate in patients undergoing the retrosigmoid approach (CI: 90 % to 100 %) and a 78 % facial nerve preservation rate (CI: 72 % to 84 %). Regarding complications, the pooled analysis confirmed a 20 % complication rate (CI: 14 % to 28 %). There were no deaths related to the procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Based on the results, our <em>meta</em>-analysis identified that rescue surgery has been shown to be safe and effective for resection of vestibular schwannomas after failure of stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy, based on good facial nerve preservation rate and total lesion resection rate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 111330"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825003029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Stereotactic radiosurgery effectively controls vestibular schwannoma (VS). However, in certain cases, microsurgical resection may be necessary for tumor progression after radiosurgery or, after failure of the latter. The results on the safety and efficacy of salvage surgery for VS are still unclear, with scarce literature on the subject.
Objective
The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of salvage surgery on the resection of vestibular schwannomas that have been previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy.
Methods
Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. We used single proportion analysis with 95 % confidence intervals under a random-effects model, I2 to assess heterogeneity, and Baujat and sensitivity analysis to address high heterogeneity. Eligible studies included those with ≥ 4 patients treated with salvage surgery to resection of vestibular schwannomas after failure of stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy.
Results
Of the 1841 initially identified studies, 18 were selected, involving 455 patients, with a median follow-up of 33 months. The combined analysis showed a 69 % (CI: 58 % − 79 %) rate of good clinical outcomes. Regarding partial resection, the pooled analysis confirmed a 48 % rate (CI: 33 % to 63 %) and a 52 % complete resection rate (CI: 37 % to 67 %). The pooled analysis confirmed a 95 % hearing preservation rate in patients undergoing the retrosigmoid approach (CI: 90 % to 100 %) and a 78 % facial nerve preservation rate (CI: 72 % to 84 %). Regarding complications, the pooled analysis confirmed a 20 % complication rate (CI: 14 % to 28 %). There were no deaths related to the procedure.
Conclusion
Based on the results, our meta-analysis identified that rescue surgery has been shown to be safe and effective for resection of vestibular schwannomas after failure of stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy, based on good facial nerve preservation rate and total lesion resection rate.
期刊介绍:
This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology.
The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.