Economic assessment and the impact of policy instruments on electric two-wheelers in Vietnam

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Nguyen Thanh Trung , Yeliz Simsek , Dinh Van Hiep , Tania Urmee
{"title":"Economic assessment and the impact of policy instruments on electric two-wheelers in Vietnam","authors":"Nguyen Thanh Trung ,&nbsp;Yeliz Simsek ,&nbsp;Dinh Van Hiep ,&nbsp;Tania Urmee","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study analyzes the total cost of ownership (TCO) of electric two-wheelers (E2Ws) versus internal combustion engine two-wheelers (ICE-2Ws) in Vietnam, assessing their economic viability and adoption factors. It examines the impact of policy instruments like subsidies on affordability and market competitiveness while evaluating E2Ws' practicality in supporting Vietnam's clean energy transition. This study indicates that while E-Motorcycle has the highest TCO, followed by ICE-A motorcycles, E-Bikes have the lowest TCO. The E-motorcycle's high TCO indicates that premium electric models still face financial challenges in terms of overall affordability. Reduction in sticker price emerges as the most effective incentive, offering the largest decrease in TCO. Lower cost electric two-wheelers, such as E-Bikes, which have lower performance, are currently less expensive than two-wheelers running on internal combustion engines. Mid-range electric two-wheelers, such as E-Mopeds, which offer moderate performance, are priced similarly to manual motorbikes, the most popular model in Vietnam. Within the same segment, E2Ws offer better economic performance for owners compared to their ICE counterparts over time due to its lower fuel and maintenance costs accumulate and offset the battery replacement expenses. The analysis in this study indicates that while E2Ws are cost-effective for short-range travel, their economic viability diminishes with increasing travel distance due to lower fuel and maintenance costs accumulate and offset the battery replacement expenses. This underscores the need for targeted incentives and technological advancements to make E2Ws more competitive for broader use cases. Moreover, higher battery capacity helps reduce operating costs, significantly impacting the reduction of their TCO.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 101742"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625000924","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzes the total cost of ownership (TCO) of electric two-wheelers (E2Ws) versus internal combustion engine two-wheelers (ICE-2Ws) in Vietnam, assessing their economic viability and adoption factors. It examines the impact of policy instruments like subsidies on affordability and market competitiveness while evaluating E2Ws' practicality in supporting Vietnam's clean energy transition. This study indicates that while E-Motorcycle has the highest TCO, followed by ICE-A motorcycles, E-Bikes have the lowest TCO. The E-motorcycle's high TCO indicates that premium electric models still face financial challenges in terms of overall affordability. Reduction in sticker price emerges as the most effective incentive, offering the largest decrease in TCO. Lower cost electric two-wheelers, such as E-Bikes, which have lower performance, are currently less expensive than two-wheelers running on internal combustion engines. Mid-range electric two-wheelers, such as E-Mopeds, which offer moderate performance, are priced similarly to manual motorbikes, the most popular model in Vietnam. Within the same segment, E2Ws offer better economic performance for owners compared to their ICE counterparts over time due to its lower fuel and maintenance costs accumulate and offset the battery replacement expenses. The analysis in this study indicates that while E2Ws are cost-effective for short-range travel, their economic viability diminishes with increasing travel distance due to lower fuel and maintenance costs accumulate and offset the battery replacement expenses. This underscores the need for targeted incentives and technological advancements to make E2Ws more competitive for broader use cases. Moreover, higher battery capacity helps reduce operating costs, significantly impacting the reduction of their TCO.
经济评估和政策工具对越南电动两轮车的影响
本研究分析了越南电动两轮车(E2Ws)与内燃机两轮车(ICE-2Ws)的总拥有成本(TCO),评估了它们的经济可行性和采用因素。该报告考察了补贴等政策工具对可负担性和市场竞争力的影响,同时评估了E2Ws在支持越南清洁能源转型方面的实用性。本研究表明,E-Motorcycle的TCO最高,ICE-A摩托车次之,E-Bikes的TCO最低。电动摩托车的高TCO表明,高档电动车型在整体负担能力方面仍面临财务挑战。降低标价成为最有效的激励措施,使TCO下降幅度最大。低成本的电动两轮车,如电动自行车,虽然性能较低,但目前比使用内燃机的两轮车便宜。中档电动两轮车,如E-Mopeds,性能适中,价格与越南最受欢迎的手动摩托车相似。在同一细分市场中,随着时间的推移,E2Ws为车主提供了更好的经济性能,因为它的燃料和维护成本更低,积累起来可以抵消电池更换费用。本研究的分析表明,尽管E2Ws在短途旅行中具有成本效益,但随着行驶距离的增加,其经济可行性会随着燃料和维护成本的降低而降低,并会抵消电池更换费用。这强调了有针对性的激励措施和技术进步的必要性,以使E2Ws在更广泛的用例中更具竞争力。此外,更高的电池容量有助于降低运营成本,显著影响其TCO的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信