Virtual Reality for Pain Management and Patient Satisfaction During Outpatient Hysteroscopy: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Alejandro Olloqui, Alvaro Tejerizo‐Garcia, Carmen Guillen, Concha Perez‐Sagaseta, Cristina Gonzalez‐Macho, Ana Belen Bolívar‐Miguel, Ana Villalba‐Gutierrez, Blanca Gil‐Ibañez
{"title":"Virtual Reality for Pain Management and Patient Satisfaction During Outpatient Hysteroscopy: A Randomised Controlled Trial","authors":"Alejandro Olloqui, Alvaro Tejerizo‐Garcia, Carmen Guillen, Concha Perez‐Sagaseta, Cristina Gonzalez‐Macho, Ana Belen Bolívar‐Miguel, Ana Villalba‐Gutierrez, Blanca Gil‐Ibañez","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo evaluate virtual reality (VR) as a distraction technique to diminish pain perception and improve satisfaction in patients who underwent an outpatient hysteroscopy (OH).DesignA prospective, parallel group, 1:1 randomised controlled trial.SettingSpanish University Hospital.SampleA total of 120 patients between 18 and 70 years old underwent an OH.MethodA total of 120 patients were randomly allocated to undergo an OH either with standard treatment with vocal‐local support (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 60) or with the use of a VR device (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 60) between January and June 2022.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome was worst and average patient‐reported pain score (0–10) during the procedure. The secondary outcome was patient satisfaction (1–5) with the OH and with the use of VR.ResultsMean duration of the procedure (4.57 vs. 5.63 min, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.11) and procedure performed did not differ among groups. There were no statistically significant differences in worst pain perception (VAS score 4.83 vs. 4.84, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.95) or average pain perception (VAS score 2.91 vs. 3.21, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.41) between the standard care and the VR group. There were no statistically significant differences in patient satisfaction between both groups.ConclusionsThe use of VR was as effective as the standard care with vocal‐local support to improve pain perception and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing OH.Trial Registration<jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" xlink:href=\"http://clinicaltrials.gov\">ClinicalTrials.gov</jats:ext-link>: NCT06463210","PeriodicalId":8984,"journal":{"name":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":"135 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.18228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate virtual reality (VR) as a distraction technique to diminish pain perception and improve satisfaction in patients who underwent an outpatient hysteroscopy (OH).DesignA prospective, parallel group, 1:1 randomised controlled trial.SettingSpanish University Hospital.SampleA total of 120 patients between 18 and 70 years old underwent an OH.MethodA total of 120 patients were randomly allocated to undergo an OH either with standard treatment with vocal‐local support (n = 60) or with the use of a VR device (n = 60) between January and June 2022.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome was worst and average patient‐reported pain score (0–10) during the procedure. The secondary outcome was patient satisfaction (1–5) with the OH and with the use of VR.ResultsMean duration of the procedure (4.57 vs. 5.63 min, p = 0.11) and procedure performed did not differ among groups. There were no statistically significant differences in worst pain perception (VAS score 4.83 vs. 4.84, p = 0.95) or average pain perception (VAS score 2.91 vs. 3.21, p = 0.41) between the standard care and the VR group. There were no statistically significant differences in patient satisfaction between both groups.ConclusionsThe use of VR was as effective as the standard care with vocal‐local support to improve pain perception and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing OH.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06463210
虚拟现实在门诊宫腔镜疼痛管理和患者满意度:一项随机对照试验
目的评价虚拟现实(VR)作为一种分散注意力的技术,在门诊宫腔镜(OH)患者中减少疼痛感,提高满意度。设计前瞻性、平行组、1:1随机对照试验。西班牙大学医院。共有120名年龄在18至70岁之间的患者接受了OH。方法在2022年1月至6月期间,共有120名患者被随机分配接受标准治疗,包括声音-局部支持(n = 60)或使用VR设备(n = 60)。主要结局指标:主要结局为手术期间最差和患者报告的平均疼痛评分(0-10)。次要结果是患者对OH和VR使用的满意度(1-5)。结果手术的平均持续时间(4.57 vs. 5.63 min, p = 0.11)和手术过程在组间无差异。标准治疗组和VR组在最严重疼痛感觉(VAS评分4.83比4.84,p = 0.95)和平均疼痛感觉(VAS评分2.91比3.21,p = 0.41)方面无统计学差异。两组患者满意度差异无统计学意义。结论在改善OH患者的疼痛感知和患者满意度方面,VR的使用与声音局部支持的标准治疗同样有效。临床试验注册网站:NCT06463210
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信