Alejandro Olloqui, Alvaro Tejerizo-Garcia, Carmen Guillen, Concha Perez-Sagaseta, Cristina Gonzalez-Macho, Ana Belen Bolívar-Miguel, Ana Villalba-Gutierrez, Blanca Gil-Ibañez
{"title":"Virtual Reality for Pain Management and Patient Satisfaction During Outpatient Hysteroscopy: A Randomised Controlled Trial","authors":"Alejandro Olloqui, Alvaro Tejerizo-Garcia, Carmen Guillen, Concha Perez-Sagaseta, Cristina Gonzalez-Macho, Ana Belen Bolívar-Miguel, Ana Villalba-Gutierrez, Blanca Gil-Ibañez","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate virtual reality (VR) as a distraction technique to diminish pain perception and improve satisfaction in patients who underwent an outpatient hysteroscopy (OH).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective, parallel group, 1:1 randomised controlled trial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Spanish University Hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Sample</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 120 patients between 18 and 70 years old underwent an OH.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 120 patients were randomly allocated to undergo an OH either with standard treatment with vocal-local support (<i>n</i> = 60) or with the use of a VR device (<i>n</i> = 60) between January and June 2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>The primary outcome was worst and average patient-reported pain score (0–10) during the procedure. The secondary outcome was patient satisfaction (1–5) with the OH and with the use of VR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Mean duration of the procedure (4.57 vs. 5.63 min, <i>p</i> = 0.11) and procedure performed did not differ among groups. There were no statistically significant differences in worst pain perception (VAS score 4.83 vs. 4.84, <i>p</i> = 0.95) or average pain perception (VAS score 2.91 vs. 3.21, <i>p</i> = 0.41) between the standard care and the VR group. There were no statistically significant differences in patient satisfaction between both groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The use of VR was as effective as the standard care with vocal-local support to improve pain perception and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing OH.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06463210</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 10","pages":"1416-1425"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18228","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate virtual reality (VR) as a distraction technique to diminish pain perception and improve satisfaction in patients who underwent an outpatient hysteroscopy (OH).
Design
A prospective, parallel group, 1:1 randomised controlled trial.
Setting
Spanish University Hospital.
Sample
A total of 120 patients between 18 and 70 years old underwent an OH.
Method
A total of 120 patients were randomly allocated to undergo an OH either with standard treatment with vocal-local support (n = 60) or with the use of a VR device (n = 60) between January and June 2022.
Main Outcome Measures
The primary outcome was worst and average patient-reported pain score (0–10) during the procedure. The secondary outcome was patient satisfaction (1–5) with the OH and with the use of VR.
Results
Mean duration of the procedure (4.57 vs. 5.63 min, p = 0.11) and procedure performed did not differ among groups. There were no statistically significant differences in worst pain perception (VAS score 4.83 vs. 4.84, p = 0.95) or average pain perception (VAS score 2.91 vs. 3.21, p = 0.41) between the standard care and the VR group. There were no statistically significant differences in patient satisfaction between both groups.
Conclusions
The use of VR was as effective as the standard care with vocal-local support to improve pain perception and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing OH.
期刊介绍:
BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.