Xia Yu , Linfeng Tang , Ruiqi Yan , Jiaxi Wang , Wentao Zhao , Shuguang Lyu , Qian Sui
{"title":"Quantifying PFAS contamination and environmental risk in municipal solid waste landfill refuse: Implications for landfill reuse","authors":"Xia Yu , Linfeng Tang , Ruiqi Yan , Jiaxi Wang , Wentao Zhao , Shuguang Lyu , Qian Sui","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are frequently detected at elevated levels in municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill leachate, which is recognized as an important source of environmental PFAS contamination. Yet, PFAS presence in MSW landfill refuse remains largely unexplored, despite the growing interest in landfill refuse utilization and the potential for subsequent PFAS emissions into the environment. This study aimed to quantify PFAS contamination in landfill refuse collected from a closed, typical MSW landfill, by analyzing 24 PFAS (including 18 perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) and 6 PFAA precursors) through target analysis and further capturing unknown precursors using a direct total oxidizable precursor (d-TOP) assay. Our findings revealed that perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) was the dominant PFAS in landfill refuse, with a median concentration exceeding 10 μg/kg. The comparison of PFAS in refuse and leachate based on detection and mass level clearly reflected that large amount of PFAS, particularly long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs) and PFAA precursors, was still retained in refuse compared to leachate even after more than ten years’ leaching. Moreover, significant levels of unknown precursors were identified through the d-TOP assay, highlight that neglecting these unknown precursors could lead to an underestimation of PFAS contamination by a factor of 4 to 18. A probabilistic risk assessment indicated a 25 % likelihood that PFAS in landfill refuse pose moderate to high environmental risk, if excavated refuse is sieved and used as greening soil. To our knowledge, this study marks the first report on PFAS distribution between landfill refuse and leachate, as well as the contribution of unknown precursors in refuse, which underscores the need to consider potential PFAS emission when MSW landfill refuse faces utilization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"283 ","pages":"Article 123881"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135425007894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are frequently detected at elevated levels in municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill leachate, which is recognized as an important source of environmental PFAS contamination. Yet, PFAS presence in MSW landfill refuse remains largely unexplored, despite the growing interest in landfill refuse utilization and the potential for subsequent PFAS emissions into the environment. This study aimed to quantify PFAS contamination in landfill refuse collected from a closed, typical MSW landfill, by analyzing 24 PFAS (including 18 perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) and 6 PFAA precursors) through target analysis and further capturing unknown precursors using a direct total oxidizable precursor (d-TOP) assay. Our findings revealed that perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) was the dominant PFAS in landfill refuse, with a median concentration exceeding 10 μg/kg. The comparison of PFAS in refuse and leachate based on detection and mass level clearly reflected that large amount of PFAS, particularly long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs) and PFAA precursors, was still retained in refuse compared to leachate even after more than ten years’ leaching. Moreover, significant levels of unknown precursors were identified through the d-TOP assay, highlight that neglecting these unknown precursors could lead to an underestimation of PFAS contamination by a factor of 4 to 18. A probabilistic risk assessment indicated a 25 % likelihood that PFAS in landfill refuse pose moderate to high environmental risk, if excavated refuse is sieved and used as greening soil. To our knowledge, this study marks the first report on PFAS distribution between landfill refuse and leachate, as well as the contribution of unknown precursors in refuse, which underscores the need to consider potential PFAS emission when MSW landfill refuse faces utilization.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.