Exploring acute cellular rejection in lung transplantation: insights from donor-derived cell-free DNA analysis.

IF 0.7
Andrea Zajacova, Majd Alkhouri, Miray Guney, Goncalo Ferrao, David Rezac, Kristyna Vyskocilova, Tereza Kotowski, Alzbeta Dutkova, Eliska Dvorackova, Robert Lischke, Libor Fila, Jan Havlin
{"title":"Exploring acute cellular rejection in lung transplantation: insights from donor-derived cell-free DNA analysis.","authors":"Andrea Zajacova, Majd Alkhouri, Miray Guney, Goncalo Ferrao, David Rezac, Kristyna Vyskocilova, Tereza Kotowski, Alzbeta Dutkova, Eliska Dvorackova, Robert Lischke, Libor Fila, Jan Havlin","doi":"10.5507/bp.2025.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a frequent complication following lung transplantation, yet standardized guidelines for ACR screening remain lacking. This study aimed to compare the current gold standard for ACR evaluation - histological assessment of transbronchial biopsies - with a novel biomarker for allograft monitoring: donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA). Specifically, we investigated whether total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and both the absolute and percentage values of dd-cfDNA (dd-cfDNA and dd-cfDNA%) could provide valuable insights into detecting ACR and assessing allograft health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients after bilateral lung transplantation between May 2021 and March 2024 were included. Clinically significant ACR cases (ACR+) were defined as samples with histological ACR grade ≥A2 or ACR grade A1 in patients who have received antirejection therapy due to symptoms, CT findings, or lung function decline. Samples with A0 or A1 rejection in clinically stable, untreated patients were classified as controls. Measurements of dd-cfDNA%, dd-cfDNA (cp/mL) and total cfDNA (cp/mL) were obtained at the time of biopsy and compared between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median dd-cfDNA concentration was significantly higher in the ACR+ group (61.2 cp/mL, IQR: 38.7-114.1) compared to controls (25.8 cp/mL, IQR: 10.7-65.7; P=0.04). However, no significant differences were observed for dd-cfDNA% and cfDNA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dd-cfDNA shows promise as a valuable tool for ruling out ACR; however, further research is necessary in order to validate its clinical utility and optimize its implementation. Its negative predictive value supports dd-cfDNA as an effective screening tool for allograft health, nevertheless, further investigation is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":520569,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia","volume":" ","pages":"33-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2025.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a frequent complication following lung transplantation, yet standardized guidelines for ACR screening remain lacking. This study aimed to compare the current gold standard for ACR evaluation - histological assessment of transbronchial biopsies - with a novel biomarker for allograft monitoring: donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA). Specifically, we investigated whether total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and both the absolute and percentage values of dd-cfDNA (dd-cfDNA and dd-cfDNA%) could provide valuable insights into detecting ACR and assessing allograft health.

Methods: Patients after bilateral lung transplantation between May 2021 and March 2024 were included. Clinically significant ACR cases (ACR+) were defined as samples with histological ACR grade ≥A2 or ACR grade A1 in patients who have received antirejection therapy due to symptoms, CT findings, or lung function decline. Samples with A0 or A1 rejection in clinically stable, untreated patients were classified as controls. Measurements of dd-cfDNA%, dd-cfDNA (cp/mL) and total cfDNA (cp/mL) were obtained at the time of biopsy and compared between cohorts.

Results: The median dd-cfDNA concentration was significantly higher in the ACR+ group (61.2 cp/mL, IQR: 38.7-114.1) compared to controls (25.8 cp/mL, IQR: 10.7-65.7; P=0.04). However, no significant differences were observed for dd-cfDNA% and cfDNA.

Conclusion: Dd-cfDNA shows promise as a valuable tool for ruling out ACR; however, further research is necessary in order to validate its clinical utility and optimize its implementation. Its negative predictive value supports dd-cfDNA as an effective screening tool for allograft health, nevertheless, further investigation is required.

探索肺移植急性细胞排斥反应:来自供体来源的无细胞DNA分析的见解。
背景:急性细胞排斥反应(ACR)是肺移植术后常见的并发症,但ACR筛查的标准化指南仍然缺乏。本研究旨在比较目前ACR评估的金标准——经支气管活检的组织学评估——与异体移植物监测的一种新的生物标志物:供体来源的无细胞DNA (dd-cfDNA)。具体来说,我们研究了总游离DNA (cfDNA)和dd-cfDNA的绝对值和百分比值(dd-cfDNA和dd-cfDNA%)是否可以为检测ACR和评估同种异体移植健康提供有价值的见解。方法:纳入2021年5月至2024年3月双侧肺移植患者。临床显著ACR病例(ACR+)定义为在因症状、CT表现或肺功能下降而接受抗排斥治疗的患者中,组织学ACR等级≥A2或ACR等级A1的样本。临床稳定且未经治疗的患者中出现A0或A1排斥反应的样本作为对照组。在活检时测量dd-cfDNA%、dd-cfDNA (cp/mL)和总cfDNA (cp/mL),并在队列之间进行比较。结果:ACR+组dd-cfDNA中位浓度(61.2 cp/mL, IQR: 38.7-114.1)显著高于对照组(25.8 cp/mL, IQR: 10.7-65.7;P = 0.04)。然而,dd-cfDNA%和cfDNA没有显著差异。结论:Dd-cfDNA有望成为排除ACR的有效工具;然而,为了验证其临床应用和优化其实施,还需要进一步的研究。其阴性预测值支持dd-cfDNA作为同种异体移植健康的有效筛选工具,然而,需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书