Low-frequency pitch sensitivity and speech perception performance in adult cochlear implant users fitted with fine structure strategies.

IF 2.2
Patrizia Mancini, Yılmaz Odabaşı, Ginevra Portanova, Francesca Yoshie Russo, Giannicola Iannella, Hilal Dincer D'Alessandro
{"title":"Low-frequency pitch sensitivity and speech perception performance in adult cochlear implant users fitted with fine structure strategies.","authors":"Patrizia Mancini, Yılmaz Odabaşı, Ginevra Portanova, Francesca Yoshie Russo, Giannicola Iannella, Hilal Dincer D'Alessandro","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09449-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cochlear implant (CI) users may perceive pitch changes via repetition rate (RP) and place-of-stimulation (PP) coding mechanisms. This study investigated whether CI users fitted with fine structure (FS) strategies can discriminate low-frequency (LF) pitch changes via RP and whether RP performers show better speech recognition than PP performers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty postlingually deafened adult CI users (15 unilateral, 15 bilateral) participated in this study. LF pitch discrimination linked to temporal fine structure (TFS) sensitivity was assessed with the Disharmonic Intonation test (A§E psychoacoustic test suite), while speech perception was evaluated with phonetically balanced words and everyday sentences (both in quiet and noise), and the Italian Matrix test (in adaptive mode).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Just noticeable differences (JNDs) in RP performers were significantly better compared to PP JNDs (p < 0.001, r = 0.80). No significant differences were found between unilateral and bilateral CI users for LF pitch perception (p > 0.05). Within-group comparisons (better ear versus bilateral listening) revealed that better ear JNDs were not significantly different from the bilateral performance (p > 0.05), whereas significant bilateral benefit was observed for word recognition score (WRS) + 10 (p = 0.016, r = 1.00), WRS + 5 (p = 0.021, r = 1.00), and Matrix performance (p = 0.033, r = 0.80). Speech recognition in noise was significantly better in RP performers compared to PP performers across multiple tests, including WRS + 10 (p = 0.002, r = 0.90), WRS + 5 (p = 0.001, r = 0.90), and the Matrix test (p = 0.03, r = 0.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the advantages of FS coding strategies in improving TFS sensitivity and speech perception in complex listening environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":520614,"journal":{"name":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09449-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Cochlear implant (CI) users may perceive pitch changes via repetition rate (RP) and place-of-stimulation (PP) coding mechanisms. This study investigated whether CI users fitted with fine structure (FS) strategies can discriminate low-frequency (LF) pitch changes via RP and whether RP performers show better speech recognition than PP performers.

Methods: Thirty postlingually deafened adult CI users (15 unilateral, 15 bilateral) participated in this study. LF pitch discrimination linked to temporal fine structure (TFS) sensitivity was assessed with the Disharmonic Intonation test (A§E psychoacoustic test suite), while speech perception was evaluated with phonetically balanced words and everyday sentences (both in quiet and noise), and the Italian Matrix test (in adaptive mode).

Results: Just noticeable differences (JNDs) in RP performers were significantly better compared to PP JNDs (p < 0.001, r = 0.80). No significant differences were found between unilateral and bilateral CI users for LF pitch perception (p > 0.05). Within-group comparisons (better ear versus bilateral listening) revealed that better ear JNDs were not significantly different from the bilateral performance (p > 0.05), whereas significant bilateral benefit was observed for word recognition score (WRS) + 10 (p = 0.016, r = 1.00), WRS + 5 (p = 0.021, r = 1.00), and Matrix performance (p = 0.033, r = 0.80). Speech recognition in noise was significantly better in RP performers compared to PP performers across multiple tests, including WRS + 10 (p = 0.002, r = 0.90), WRS + 5 (p = 0.001, r = 0.90), and the Matrix test (p = 0.03, r = 0.60).

Conclusion: These findings highlight the advantages of FS coding strategies in improving TFS sensitivity and speech perception in complex listening environments.

精细结构策略对成人人工耳蜗使用者低频音高敏感度及语音感知表现的影响。
目的:人工耳蜗(CI)使用者可能通过重复率(RP)和刺激位置(PP)编码机制感知音高变化。本研究考察了采用精细结构(FS)策略的CI使用者是否能够通过RP识别低频(LF)音高变化,以及RP者是否比PP者表现出更好的语音识别能力。方法:30例语后耳聋成人CI使用者(单侧15例,双侧15例)参与本研究。使用非调和语调测试(A§E心理声学测试套)评估与颞精细结构(TFS)敏感性相关的低频音高辨别,而使用语音平衡词和日常句子(安静和噪音)以及意大利语矩阵测试(自适应模式)评估语音感知。结果:RP患者的JNDs明显优于PP患者(p < 0.05)。组内比较(耳朵听力较好与双侧听力较好)显示,双侧听力较好与双侧听力无显著差异(p < 0.05),而双侧词汇识别评分(WRS) + 10分(p = 0.016, r = 1.00)、WRS + 5分(p = 0.021, r = 1.00)和矩阵表现(p = 0.033, r = 0.80)显著改善。在WRS + 10 (p = 0.002, r = 0.90)、WRS + 5 (p = 0.001, r = 0.90)和Matrix测试(p = 0.03, r = 0.60)等多个测试中,RP测试者在噪声下的语音识别明显优于PP测试者。结论:这些发现突出了语音编码策略在提高复杂听力环境下语音感知和TFS敏感性方面的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信