Sakir Gıca, Aysenur Arslan, Sinan Cakır, Mehmet Sinan Iyısoy, Zeynep Karaman, Emine Nur Sen, Yasin Hasan Balcıoglu
{"title":"Development of the National Adult Reading Test-Türkiye (NART-TR) for practical assessment of mental capacity.","authors":"Sakir Gıca, Aysenur Arslan, Sinan Cakır, Mehmet Sinan Iyısoy, Zeynep Karaman, Emine Nur Sen, Yasin Hasan Balcıoglu","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2508478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To develop the National Adult Reading Test-Türkiye (NART-TR), a reading-based mental capacity assessment tool tailored to the Turkish language. Its utility was evaluated through reliability and validity testing, with a focus on its accuracy in predicting IQ scores. <b>Methods:</b> The study sample comprised of 148 native Turkish-speaking participants, including 23 indivuduals with Extremely Low IQ (EL,FSIQ:50-69), 25 individuals with Borderline/Low Average IQ (BLA,FSIQ:70-89), and 100 healthy controls (HC) with Average/High Average/Superior IQ (AHS, FSIQ > 90). Each participant completed a sociodemographic form, the WAIS-R, the NART-TR. <b>Results:</b> The mean age of participants was 24.9 years (SD = 6.07), with 74(50%) females and 107(72.3%) holding a university degree. A large inverse correlation was observed between the total number of NART-TR errors and WAIS-R total (r = -0.75, <i>p</i> < 0.001), performance (r = -0.66, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and verbal subscale scores (r = -0.81, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Segmented regression analysis was used to estimate WAIS-R total, verbal, performance IQ scores based on NART-TR error counts. The ICCs between the estimated and actual WAIS-R total, verbal, and performance IQ scores were found to be high (0.965 [CI: 0.952, 0.975], 0.927[CI: 0.900, 0.947], and 0.833 [CI: 0.776, 0.876], respectively). Additionally, error scores could effectively distinguish between the three groups, with cutoff points of 12 for AHS-IQ vs. BLA-IQ and 20 for BLA-IQ vs. EL-IQ (Respectively, AUC = 0.988 and 0.942). <b>Conclusion:</b> The NART-TR demonstrated robust reliability and validity as a quick and efficient tool for estimating the WAIS-R scores, supporting its use in detailed cognitive research and as a practical tool for the assessment of intellectual functioning in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1505-1520"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2508478","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To develop the National Adult Reading Test-Türkiye (NART-TR), a reading-based mental capacity assessment tool tailored to the Turkish language. Its utility was evaluated through reliability and validity testing, with a focus on its accuracy in predicting IQ scores. Methods: The study sample comprised of 148 native Turkish-speaking participants, including 23 indivuduals with Extremely Low IQ (EL,FSIQ:50-69), 25 individuals with Borderline/Low Average IQ (BLA,FSIQ:70-89), and 100 healthy controls (HC) with Average/High Average/Superior IQ (AHS, FSIQ > 90). Each participant completed a sociodemographic form, the WAIS-R, the NART-TR. Results: The mean age of participants was 24.9 years (SD = 6.07), with 74(50%) females and 107(72.3%) holding a university degree. A large inverse correlation was observed between the total number of NART-TR errors and WAIS-R total (r = -0.75, p < 0.001), performance (r = -0.66, p < 0.001), and verbal subscale scores (r = -0.81, p < 0.001). Segmented regression analysis was used to estimate WAIS-R total, verbal, performance IQ scores based on NART-TR error counts. The ICCs between the estimated and actual WAIS-R total, verbal, and performance IQ scores were found to be high (0.965 [CI: 0.952, 0.975], 0.927[CI: 0.900, 0.947], and 0.833 [CI: 0.776, 0.876], respectively). Additionally, error scores could effectively distinguish between the three groups, with cutoff points of 12 for AHS-IQ vs. BLA-IQ and 20 for BLA-IQ vs. EL-IQ (Respectively, AUC = 0.988 and 0.942). Conclusion: The NART-TR demonstrated robust reliability and validity as a quick and efficient tool for estimating the WAIS-R scores, supporting its use in detailed cognitive research and as a practical tool for the assessment of intellectual functioning in clinical settings.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.