Wilton Batista de Santana Júnior, Marcelo M Pinto Filho, Sandhi Maria Barreto, Murilo Foppa, Luana Giatti, Rohan Khera, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro
{"title":"Use of Artificial Intelligence Applied to Electrocardiogram for Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.","authors":"Wilton Batista de Santana Júnior, Marcelo M Pinto Filho, Sandhi Maria Barreto, Murilo Foppa, Luana Giatti, Rohan Khera, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro","doi":"10.36660/abc.20240740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is a disease associated with an important type of morbidity and mortality. The electrocardiogram (ECG), one of the tests used to evaluate HF, is low-cost and widely available.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm applied to ECG to detect HF and compare it with the predictive power of major electrocardiographic alterations (MEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This work is a diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study. All participants were from the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (Estudo Longitudinal da Saúde do Adulto - ELSA-Brasil) and presented a valid ECG and echocardiogram (ECHO). The algorithm estimated probability values for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). The assessed endpoint was left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% in the ECHO. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were determined for both the algorithm and the MEA. The area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) for the algorithm was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the analytical sample of 2,567 individuals, the prevalence of LVEF <40% was 1.13% (29 individuals). The values obtained for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR+, LR-, and DOR for the algorithm were 0.690, 0.976, 0.244, 0.996, 27.6, 0.32, and 88.74, respectively. For the MEA, the values were 0.172, 0.837, 0.012, 0.989, 1.09, 0.990, and 1.07, respectively. The AUC-ROC of the algorithm to predict the LVEF <40% was 0.947 (95% CI: 0.913 - 0.981).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI algorithm performed well in detecting LVSD and can be used as a screening tool for LVSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"122 4","pages":"e20240740"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a disease associated with an important type of morbidity and mortality. The electrocardiogram (ECG), one of the tests used to evaluate HF, is low-cost and widely available.
Objective: To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm applied to ECG to detect HF and compare it with the predictive power of major electrocardiographic alterations (MEA).
Methods: This work is a diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study. All participants were from the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (Estudo Longitudinal da Saúde do Adulto - ELSA-Brasil) and presented a valid ECG and echocardiogram (ECHO). The algorithm estimated probability values for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). The assessed endpoint was left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% in the ECHO. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were determined for both the algorithm and the MEA. The area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) for the algorithm was calculated.
Results: In the analytical sample of 2,567 individuals, the prevalence of LVEF <40% was 1.13% (29 individuals). The values obtained for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR+, LR-, and DOR for the algorithm were 0.690, 0.976, 0.244, 0.996, 27.6, 0.32, and 88.74, respectively. For the MEA, the values were 0.172, 0.837, 0.012, 0.989, 1.09, 0.990, and 1.07, respectively. The AUC-ROC of the algorithm to predict the LVEF <40% was 0.947 (95% CI: 0.913 - 0.981).
Conclusion: The AI algorithm performed well in detecting LVSD and can be used as a screening tool for LVSD.
背景:心力衰竭是一种与发病率和死亡率相关的重要疾病。心电图(ECG)是一种用于评估心衰的检测方法,成本低且可广泛使用。目的:评价人工智能(AI)算法用于心电检测HF的性能,并将其与主要心电图改变(MEA)的预测能力进行比较。方法:本研究为诊断准确性横断面研究。所有参与者均来自成人健康纵向研究(Estudo Longitudinal da Saúde do Adulto - ELSA-Brasil),并提供有效的心电图和超声心动图(ECHO)。该算法估计左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)的概率值。评估终点为左室射血分数(LVEF)结果:在2567例分析样本中,LVEF的患病率。结论:人工智能算法对LVSD的检测效果良好,可作为LVSD的筛查工具。